1) The OP stated that he could do the rest of the work with the angle.Originally posted by: mugs
I agree that it's possible, but why would you need/want to know the angle of the plane? Isn't the acceleration all you need to solve the problem?
Originally posted by: RGUN
Why would you waste time figuring out the angle? Just avoid that and setup your axis so that the ball travels parallel to x, therefore the angle is 0 in your local coordinate system. Now its just a matter of finding out the acceleration and then carrying that through for 27s
Originally posted by: dullard
It isn't like we are talking hours here. We are talking seconds worth of work.Originally posted by: mugs
I agree that it's possible, but why would you need/want to know the angle of the plane? Isn't the acceleration all you need to solve the problem?
Originally posted by: scorpmatt
Originally posted by: dullard
It isn't like we are talking hours here. We are talking seconds worth of work.Originally posted by: mugs
I agree that it's possible, but why would you need/want to know the angle of the plane? Isn't the acceleration all you need to solve the problem?
27 seconds to be exact.![]()
Originally posted by: TheCanuck
Go here for some simple formulas in velocity: Velocity
Angle, friction, and gravity are irrelevant. Resistance is futile.
Solve for v, then a, then figure out vf, then calc your final distance -- less than 20 more than 12![]()
Originally posted by: Savij
Originally posted by: TheCanuck
Go here for some simple formulas in velocity: Velocity
Angle, friction, and gravity are irrelevant. Resistance is futile.
Solve for v, then a, then figure out vf, then calc your final distance -- less than 20 more than 12![]()
I'm runing through my numbers and getting something higher than that...
Originally posted by: cRazYdood
Originally posted by: Savij
Originally posted by: TheCanuck
Go here for some simple formulas in velocity: Velocity
Angle, friction, and gravity are irrelevant. Resistance is futile.
Solve for v, then a, then figure out vf, then calc your final distance -- less than 20 more than 12![]()
I'm runing through my numbers and getting something higher than that...
Me too, much higher.
Although I am very rusty and could have done something dumb.
Originally posted by: cRazYdood
Originally posted by: Savij
Originally posted by: TheCanuck
Go here for some simple formulas in velocity: Velocity
Angle, friction, and gravity are irrelevant. Resistance is futile.
Solve for v, then a, then figure out vf, then calc your final distance -- less than 20 more than 12![]()
I'm runing through my numbers and getting something higher than that...
Me too, much higher.
Although I am very rusty and could have done something dumb.
Originally posted by: 2Xtreme21
Originally posted by: cRazYdood
Originally posted by: Savij
Originally posted by: TheCanuck
Go here for some simple formulas in velocity: Velocity
Angle, friction, and gravity are irrelevant. Resistance is futile.
Solve for v, then a, then figure out vf, then calc your final distance -- less than 20 more than 12![]()
I'm runing through my numbers and getting something higher than that...
Me too, much higher.
Although I am very rusty and could have done something dumb.
Guys, I appreciate all the help muchly. Came up with 36 on my first try and it's the correct answer.Thank you thank you thank you!
Close. 36 m is correct. But 36 isn't. I know, I'm picky.Originally posted by: 2Xtreme21
Guys, I appreciate all the help muchly. Came up with 36 on my first try and it's the correct answer.Thank you thank you thank you!
Originally posted by: dullard
Close. 36 m is correct. But 36 isn't. I know, I'm picky.Originally posted by: 2Xtreme21
Guys, I appreciate all the help muchly. Came up with 36 on my first try and it's the correct answer.Thank you thank you thank you!
Originally posted by: Savij
Originally posted by: scorpmatt
Originally posted by: dullard
It isn't like we are talking hours here. We are talking seconds worth of work.Originally posted by: mugs
I agree that it's possible, but why would you need/want to know the angle of the plane? Isn't the acceleration all you need to solve the problem?
27 seconds to be exact.![]()
How do you know the work without the mass of the ball?
Originally posted by: dullard
That's what she said?Originally posted by: scorpmatt
27 seconds to be exact.![]()
Originally posted by: scorpmatt
Originally posted by: Savij
Originally posted by: scorpmatt
Originally posted by: dullard
It isn't like we are talking hours here. We are talking seconds worth of work.Originally posted by: mugs
I agree that it's possible, but why would you need/want to know the angle of the plane? Isn't the acceleration all you need to solve the problem?
27 seconds to be exact.![]()
How do you know the work without the mass of the ball?
27 seconds is already given
Originally posted by: Schmide
To solve such a problem you need 2 of the following
Forces, Scale/Positions/Displacement, Time
The only thing given in that problem is time. No solution.
Some may say the the force of gravity is given, but you can't determine how it is applied to the sphere without knowing the angle of the ramp. So no you don't have the force.