Is Crucial Registerred DDR slower than Unbuffered DDR?

JmanSanDiego

Junior Member
Nov 15, 2001
18
0
0
This is a scary thought for me.. I just purchased 512mb of Crucial PC2100 DDR Registered ECC memory for my Abit-KG-7 mobo which supports this format of memoy and now I've read that this memory type is SLOWER than it's cheaper unbuffered type...

Tell me this isn't true..

Jon
 

John

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
33,944
4
81
If it is slower, it is only going to be seen while running a benchmark. Unless you are running a mission critical server you do not need ECC memory.
 

JmanSanDiego

Junior Member
Nov 15, 2001
18
0
0
Well, my motherboard states that if you plan to use all four DIMM slots you must use Registered ECC type of memory.. I only bought two sticks but figured I may want to buy two more down the line so I went ahead and bought the "good stuff" now...

But I guess that MAYBE was a mistake.... Although from what you are telling me, it is a VERY small difference...
 

Noriaki

Lifer
Jun 3, 2000
13,640
1
71
Registered and ECC are two separate things....

Registered (also called Buffered) vs Unbuffered, is for using large amounts of RAM in a single board.

Your board may require Registered modules to populate all the slots.

The speed difference should be negligable, if any.



ECC vs non-ECC.
ECC has better error correcting and checking, so it lowers the chance of a corruption, though the chances are quite small anyways.
ECC is both more expensive, and slower. But the slower is also very small.

Personally I go non-ECC since it's a bit cheaper, but ECC is not going to be significantly slower enough that you'll notice it. And it will be more stable, though probably not enough of a difference that you'll notice it.