JEDIYoda
Lifer
- Jul 13, 2005
- 33,986
- 3,321
- 126
It's as if you didn't read the details of the law that just passed.
for once i have to agree with Flavio....Drebo did not read the details....
It's as if you didn't read the details of the law that just passed.
http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.p...Two_Primaries_Act_(June_2010)#Ballot_languageBallot title and label: "Elections. Increases Right to Participate in Primary Elections." Reforms the primary election process for congressional, statewide, and legislative races. Allows all voters to choose any candidate regardless of the candidate’s or voter’s political party preference. Ensures that the two candidates receiving the greatest number of votes will appear on the general election ballot regardless of party preference.
(Note: This ballot title was written by a California Superior Court judge on March 12, 2010 in response to a ballot title lawsuit. The previous ballot title said, "Primary election process reform. Greater participation in elections.")
Official summary: Encourages increased participation in elections for congressional, legislative, and statewide offices by reforming the procedure by which candidates are selected in primary elections. Gives voters increased options in the primary by allowing all voters to choose any candidate regardless of the candidate’s or voter’s political party preference. Provides that candidates may choose not to have a political party preference indicated on the primary ballot. Provides that only the two candidates receiving the greatest number of votes in the primary will appear on the general election ballot regardless of party preference. Does not change primary elections for President, party committee offices and nonpartisan offices.