Is burnproof necessary today?

Muerto

Golden Member
Dec 26, 1999
1,937
0
0
I'm looking to buy a CDRW and I can't decide between these two:

Creative Labs 12x10x32x w/ burnproof. Also comes with software.
Yamaha 16x/10/40x w/o burnproof. I'm not sure if it comes with software or not but I don't think it does.

I've got a pretty decent system so I'm wondering if I should go with burnproof or not. They're both the same price, $200 CDN. I already have Nero 5.0 so it doesn't matter weather it comes with software or not (5.5 is the most recent version right?). So what do you think? Thanks.
 

stso

Platinum Member
Nov 17, 2000
2,528
0
0
Yes it is necessory in my opinion.
By the way, I think it is better to get Lite-On 24x cdrw, it's only $150 USD right now!!
 

crt1530

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2001
3,194
0
0


<< YAMMY MA MAN!! >>


I have absolutely NO idea WTF that is supposed to mean. I guess I could make a huge stretch and guess Yamaha.

Here's an idea for you, viper: say what you type outloud before you post it. If it doesn't make sense when you say it, it won't make sense when people read it.
 

Tseng

Senior member
Oct 9, 1999
551
0
0
I got the YAMAHA SCSI version a few months ago. With SCSI interface, I figured that burnproof or similar technologies are not necessary. And I was right, my YAMAHA never gives me any problems.

If you are going to get E-IDE version, burnproof is still necessay.
 

LXi

Diamond Member
Apr 18, 2000
7,987
0
0
<<I have absolutely NO idea WTF that is supposed to mean. I guess I could make a huge stretch and guess Yamaha.>>

Well, Yammy is Yamaha's nickname so that made sense to me, and apparently it made sense to you too 'cause you made the right guess.
 

TechMaster

Senior member
Mar 17, 2000
523
0
0
burnproof is nice - i would like to have this in my burner (Plextor 8x4x32)

But I never needed it since I NEVER had "Buffer Underrun" error before - and my burner is EIDE...

I would reccomend you getting a Plextor Drive - with or without BP tech.

 

ST4RCUTTER

Platinum Member
Feb 13, 2001
2,841
0
0
Since upgrading my system I too have not needed Burnproof, but I will not get another CD-RW without this kind of protection. You never know when you might need it, and I have enough coasters (the cup kind).

 

Speedo

Senior member
Jan 12, 2000
492
0
0
I wouldn't buy a burner w/o BURN-Proof, especially now when they are getting faster and faster. Even though you have a fast system, you will not be able to do a lot of other things while burning at 24x, without the risk of a buffer underrun. I've also had a lot of "use" for Burn Proof when copying CD's "on the fly" from my CDROM.

bwt, TweakMax will soon have a review of the Plextor 24/10/40A with BURN-Proof and PoweRec-II.
 

m2super

Senior member
Jul 10, 2001
323
0
0
"I've got a pretty decent system so I'm wondering if I should go with burnproof or not. "
If you want a coaster collection get one without burnproof! It has nothing to do with you machine speed or amount of memory!
I would look into the plextor drives! The best in my and many others opinion! Just read some reviews! I would stay away from the creative burner let them make soundcards! The yamaha would be my choice between the 2 you have listed.
 

Wizkid

Platinum Member
Oct 11, 1999
2,728
0
0
How about this one instead?

<A href="http://www.ncix.com/Canada/productdetail.cfm?sku=6367">http://www.ncix.com/Canada/productdetail.cfm?sku=6367</A>

16x with burnproof for $153.68 CAD, and if you are not in BC then there is no PST. I have a few of the 12x versions of this drive and they work really well.
 

thephew

Senior member
Jun 19, 2001
219
0
71
I had a 6X Creative burner, and it had about a 50% coaster rate at 6X, about 25% at 4X, regardless of what media I gave it, even if I was doing nothing else in the background. I wouldn't trust any burner from them for the life of me. Go Lite-on man. Although that monster buffer on the Yammy is as good as burnproof from what I hear.
 

nightowl

Golden Member
Oct 12, 2000
1,935
0
0
I would say that burnproof is a necessity for an IDE system, but for a SCSI system it does not really mean that much. The only time that burnproof might come in handy on a SCSI system is if you are pushing your system to its limit of processing and IO. I would buy a SCSI burner if it did not have burnproof since I have both SCSI and IDE drives.
 

ShadyBob

Member
Aug 16, 2001
66
0
0
my burner is 2 years old, its a hp 8100i 4x2x12... i've had no problems with it, but i usually leave my comp alone while burning... ;) i dont plan on buying a new one till this breaks down
 

Guilty

Senior member
Nov 25, 2000
427
0
0
Most of the manufacturers have basically cloned burn-proof to "JustLink" or "SMART-burn" so they dont have to pay as much royalties to Sanyo. I think it will and should become standard, theres just no reason not to use it, the added cost isn't significant.
 

wfbberzerker

Lifer
Apr 12, 2001
10,423
0
0
burn-proof (or some other form of anti-buffer underrun software) is pretty much a necessity now, and is really the best method of protecting the disks. of course, you could buy a burner with a huge buffer, but its much more expensive and probably is still not as safe as burn-proof
 

LordUnum

Golden Member
Jul 3, 2001
1,153
0
0
I've been multi-tasking with my Yamaha 4416S (SCSI-2) ever since I purchased it almost 2-1/2 years ago. I have yet to burn a coaster that is the fault of my multi-tasking, or otherwise taxing the computer during the burning process (yes I've burned my share of coasters---the result of faulty CD images, copy-protected CD's, and overall, not knowing what I was doing with the software). :D :)