<<
<<
<< 1) Whether black and white should count as colors is a philosophical question more than a physical question. >>
Really, white is a mixture of all reflected colors, it is all colors. Black is no colors. So really neither of them are a singular "color"... >>
By this logic, any object that does not reflect precisely one wavelength does not have a true color. This does not make sense to me, and is why I claim it is a philosophical question.
-jothaxe >>
I have to agree with Jothaxe on this one.
I guess if you consider colours a discrete set, Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue, Indigo, Violet, etc....then in a way an object that is one of those colours is only reflecting one colour....but that's not really true. Any "colour" is made up of several waves with different wavelengths in the EM spectrum. White just happens to be more waves than say red....
So humans are making a distiction/definition based on what we percieve. All "colours" including black and white are just a collection of EM radition waves. Black happens to be fewer waves than most, white happens to be more. But from a scientific viewpoint that distiction is really not that important.
Thus is becomes a philisophical question (not to say that philisophical questions are unimportant, various philosophers are some of the most important figures in huamn history).