Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: hagbard
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: hagbard
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: SnapIT
Originally posted by: etech
You didn't become eurotrash until you started whining like one.
That's a pretty idiotic statement to make that the ENTIRE world thinks the US was wrong for ending the war with Japan as quickly as possible and with fewer causalities then the alternative. But hey, it's your statement. PROVE IT.
Actually, YOU think it is an idiotic statement, 5 billion of people think not...
You are stupid, did you know the alternative, it was firbombing, and it would have taken half the cost, and about 10% of the ones who have been hurt...
Of course, you did not know that... you just follow what you are told, just like any nice little puppy...
I bet that is what annoys you puppies, that we are bigger, stronger, faster, and that we actually find the truth while you are still yappin...
I guess you dont know how many lives were lost in Dresden do you? Firebombing killed as many if not more than the nukes did.
Not even close.
This is like shooting fish in a barrel. You really should bone up on your history.
Nagasaki/hiroshima ~230,000 dead within a year.
linkage
Dresden ~135,000 killed in firebombing feb 13, 1945
Tokyo ~124,000 killed in firebombing march 9, 1945
linkage
looks like a close race, with firebombing in the lead.
You said Dresden then firebombing....hence you meant Dresden. And the numbers I've been able to come up for that city is under 50,000.
Feel free to share your links.
Link 1
Link 2
Here is one that I just found that gives a figure greater than yours:
Link 3