• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Is a single molecule of water wet?

No. An object is wet if it contains (some particular amount of) water. For an object to contain something there must be a clear boundary between the object and its contents. Water alone can't contain itself.
 
Is he a dot, or is he a speck?
When he's underwater does he get wet?
Or does the water get him instead?
Nobody knows, Particle man
 
'Wetness' as a quality is more of a sensation restricted to neurological interpretation than a chemical property of any form of matter or energy.
 
A single molecule of water is hydrogen,hydro=water gen=birth ,it is the stuff that "gives birth" to water but is not water itself so it's not wet either.
 
'Wetness' as a quality is more of a sensation restricted to neurological interpretation than a chemical property of any form of matter or energy.
It is one of the aggregate states so it is very much definable,but you need a lot of molecules to measure it not just one.
 
Yup,partially,still a single molecule of H2O is gas, at best, and not liquid.


Sorry, you are wrong again. Discussing somethings physical state is specifically describing the interraction between the different molecules. By definition one molecule of anything is neither solid lliquid or gas.
 
No. An object is wet if it contains (some particular amount of) water. For an object to contain something there must be a clear boundary between the object and its contents. Water alone can't contain itself.

Prepare to have your mind blown.

OP's question is meaningless, because wetness isn't a valid attribute at the scale of molecules. We might as well ask what color protons are.
 
Last edited:
The point of common soap (surfactants) is to break the surface tension of water, allowing the water to become more "wet" as it is now free to stick to the pollutants and wash them away.

If that is true, then isn't the smallest quantity of water the most "wet"?
 
If we're going to call things "wet" just because there are a few molecules of water on their surface, then we might as well think everything on the surface of the Earth is wet.
 
Back
Top