BonzaiDuck
Lifer
I was just looking at the specs on this new Turbo Cool 510 (SLI version). You would think if they marketed it for "SLI" it would have a higher Amperage capacity on the 12V rail than the ordinary Turbo Cool -- but no -- 34 Amps. Same as the other versions.
I even have questions as to whether OCZ's PowerStream has "less effective" voltage regulation than the Turbo Cool. The Tech Report review of the PowerStream, Neo Power and several other makes and models showed a near absence of AC ripple voltage and rock-solid rail-voltages on the OCZ, and it came out on top based on rigorous testing and quantitative results. PC P&C declined to participate in that review, but they were willing to participate with Maximum PC, with whom they had a big advertising account (and always have had one). One of the sloppiest review jobs I've ever seen -- they inconsistently applied review criteria -- ignoring performance for a criterion with one PSU and then using it to boost the rating of another. The shell-game-shuffle apparently allowed them to give two "Kick-Ass" awards -- one to the Antec NeoPower, and the other to the Turbo Cool, which won "2nd place".
The other issue was "Active" vs "Passive" PFC. The difference is not significant for performance, and mostly means a few pennies (literally) in the home-user's electric bill.
Ignoring price, PCP&C may be the "best" you can get. I still don't like the idea that they have one model for EPS12 and PCI-E compatibility, and another for conventiional ATX -- and now a third model for "SLI". But I cannot see how earlier versions that have the 24-pin connector are not "SLI" compatible, since the 12V rail provides the same maximum power level. So the marketing on the "SLI" version seems like hype, as does the price.
If you factor price into the equation, I might be able to say the PCP&C is "as good as" some other makes and models, but not "better than".
I even have questions as to whether OCZ's PowerStream has "less effective" voltage regulation than the Turbo Cool. The Tech Report review of the PowerStream, Neo Power and several other makes and models showed a near absence of AC ripple voltage and rock-solid rail-voltages on the OCZ, and it came out on top based on rigorous testing and quantitative results. PC P&C declined to participate in that review, but they were willing to participate with Maximum PC, with whom they had a big advertising account (and always have had one). One of the sloppiest review jobs I've ever seen -- they inconsistently applied review criteria -- ignoring performance for a criterion with one PSU and then using it to boost the rating of another. The shell-game-shuffle apparently allowed them to give two "Kick-Ass" awards -- one to the Antec NeoPower, and the other to the Turbo Cool, which won "2nd place".
The other issue was "Active" vs "Passive" PFC. The difference is not significant for performance, and mostly means a few pennies (literally) in the home-user's electric bill.
Ignoring price, PCP&C may be the "best" you can get. I still don't like the idea that they have one model for EPS12 and PCI-E compatibility, and another for conventiional ATX -- and now a third model for "SLI". But I cannot see how earlier versions that have the 24-pin connector are not "SLI" compatible, since the 12V rail provides the same maximum power level. So the marketing on the "SLI" version seems like hype, as does the price.
If you factor price into the equation, I might be able to say the PCP&C is "as good as" some other makes and models, but not "better than".