- Jan 29, 2002
- 342
- 0
- 0
Here is the setup of both.
Rig 1
P4 3.0ghz w/800 fsb HT
1 GB Kingston HyperX PC4000
Intel 865 chipset
Rig 2
AMD 2500 XP+
512MB Corsair XMS PC2700
Nforce 2 chipset
Now I know that the P4 has a better overall rig, but is a P4 that much better overall in video work then an AMD?
Here's what I'm doing. I'm using DVDShrink to backup the DVDs that I purchase (I buy 4-5 DVDs a week and have a small niece and nephew to worry about).
Analysis Speed
P4 - 6,500 KB/s and 290 frames/sec
AMD- 2,500 KB/s and 110 frames/sec
For encoding I get
P4 - 7,800 KB/s and 53MB buffered
AMD- 2,600 KB/s and 49MB buffered
So basically I can analyze, encode, and burn a entire DVD with the P4 in the time it takes the AMD to just analyze. Does this seem right?
Rig 1
P4 3.0ghz w/800 fsb HT
1 GB Kingston HyperX PC4000
Intel 865 chipset
Rig 2
AMD 2500 XP+
512MB Corsair XMS PC2700
Nforce 2 chipset
Now I know that the P4 has a better overall rig, but is a P4 that much better overall in video work then an AMD?
Here's what I'm doing. I'm using DVDShrink to backup the DVDs that I purchase (I buy 4-5 DVDs a week and have a small niece and nephew to worry about).
Analysis Speed
P4 - 6,500 KB/s and 290 frames/sec
AMD- 2,500 KB/s and 110 frames/sec
For encoding I get
P4 - 7,800 KB/s and 53MB buffered
AMD- 2,600 KB/s and 49MB buffered
So basically I can analyze, encode, and burn a entire DVD with the P4 in the time it takes the AMD to just analyze. Does this seem right?