• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Is a 5 foot 5 165 pound chick fat?

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
During competition he was 2-3% body fat and probably no more than 8% at 260lbs.

8% is still extremely extremely good shape. 240-250 at 12-13% may not be all muscle but I'd still consider them in shape and they would certainly appear jacked in comparison to most.

Also, 2% body fat is super low and unhealthy. Your body needs fat to absorb toxins that enter your body. A man at 2% body fat is less resistant to disease, allergens, and poisons than a man at 8% oddly enough. Though obviously too high increases risk or heart disease and liver issues. Happy medium is the goal. 8-10% is a good goal for most men who want to be in very good shape. Noted from Wikipedia "5% is generally considered a physiological minimum for human males"

It seems that from using a scale estimated based on my BMI, I'm around a 28-29% body fat, which is on the lower ends of overweight (but I knew I was overweight) with 26% being considered acceptable. Who knows how accurate this is, but it's probably not a too bad of approximation. Also according to that if I get down to 200 I'd be in the upper end of fitness. None of this seems to account for muscularity, so I think if I aim for 200 lbs and keep the muscle I have then I'll be pretty ripped. I was actually down to 207 about 3 years ago, but started working out and gained muscle then stopped working out and gained fat too. Time to get back to the gym.
 
I love how all of the fat and macho guys are saying that 6'1" and 160lbs is skin-and-bones and underweight. LOL, whatever you guys need to tell yourselves...

If you enjoy possessing the physical strength of a child then by all means keep your body in a physically retarded state.
 
Also, 2% body fat is super low and unhealthy. Your body needs fat to absorb toxins that enter your body. A man at 2% body fat is less resistant to disease, allergens, and poisons than a man at 8% oddly enough. Though obviously too high increases risk or heart disease and liver issues. Happy medium is the goal. 8-10% is a good goal for most men who want to be in very good shape. Noted from Wikipedia "5% is generally considered a physiological minimum for human males"

It seems that from using a scale estimated based on my BMI, I'm around a 28-29% body fat, which is on the lower ends of overweight (but I knew I was overweight) with 26% being considered acceptable. Who knows how accurate this is, but it's probably not a too bad of approximation. Also according to that if I get down to 200 I'd be in the upper end of fitness. None of this seems to account for muscularity, so I think if I aim for 200 lbs and keep the muscle I have then I'll be pretty ripped. I was actually down to 207 about 3 years ago, but started working out and gained muscle then stopped working out and gained fat too. Time to get back to the gym.

yes competition weight is only kept briefly for competition for the reasons you stated.

Also I am refering to Body fat not bmi. bmi is meaningless.
 
If you enjoy possessing the physical strength of a child then by all means keep your body in a physically retarded state.
6'1 160 lbs means a BMI of 21, so in the normal range. 6'1 290 lbs gives you a BMI of 38.

"I'm not fat, everybody else are abnormally skinny wah wah".
 
6'1 160 lbs means a BMI of 21, so in the normal range. 6'1 290 lbs gives you a BMI of 38.

"I'm not fat, everybody else are abnormally skinny wah wah".

I'm obese, never said I wasn't. But I weighed 160 in 7th grade and by no means would I consider my body frame at that time to be "normal". I didn't get beefy until I hit thirty but most of my 20's I was 240 or 250 and I nobody referred to me as fat.
 
I love how all of the fat and macho guys are saying that 6'1" and 160lbs is skin-and-bones and underweight. LOL, whatever you guys need to tell yourselves...

Because it is skin and bones and underweight.

More like, whatever you need to tell yourself to make yourself feel better.

I was there for a long time, stuck at 160. It was gross.
 
you guys are all so stupid.
NO, it all depends on your body complexion. I'm 5'5 and wight 162 pounds and I never get called fat but fit.
however, if you feel insecure about your body image, exercise and a low calorie intake diet would help you boost your self-esteem.
 
you guys are all so stupid.
NO, it all depends on your body complexion. I'm 5'5 and wight 162 pounds and I never get called fat but fit.
however, if you feel insecure about your body image, exercise and a low calorie intake diet would help you boost your self-esteem.
TTIWWP:colbert:



free ipads, too.
 
you guys are all so stupid.
NO, it all depends on your body complexion. I'm 5'5 and wight 162 pounds and I never get called fat but fit.
however, if you feel insecure about your body image, exercise and a low calorie intake diet would help you boost your self-esteem.

You are stupid for necroing a 3 year old thread.
Also free iPad please.
 
Definitely fat. That's essentially what I weigh (I'm at 168 last I checked) but I am 6'1" tall!

KT
 
you guys are all so stupid.
NO, it all depends on your body complexion. I'm 5'5 and wight 162 pounds and I never get called fat but fit.
however, if you feel insecure about your body image, exercise and a low calorie intake diet would help you boost your self-esteem.
Are you a girl? Pics?
 
Back
Top