Originally posted by: shader
65nm and 65 watts are two completly different things. 65 nm refers to the photolithographic process to create the chips. if you are looking for energy efficiency, go for the chip with the lowest watt rating.
(side note - i was going to say that the fabrication process does not in any way relate to the amount of energy, however given my limited understanding of electrical engineering, that may be misleading - i'm comp sci.)
Well, a smaller fabrication process almost always means lower power consumption, with chips of the same architecture. A 65nm X2 will generate less power than a 90nm chip. There are 90nm chips that draw less power than the 65nm chips, but these are special models with fairly low clockspeeds and reduced voltage, which makes them use less power.
65nm does not, however, mean 65 watts. 90nm does not mean 90 watts. They are completely different things. Intel's QX6800 is 65nm, for example, and draws 125W. AMD's extreme low power chips (not sure if they even sell them anymore) are 90nm and draw 35W.