• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Is 5900 or so in 3dMark05 normal for my system?

Ricemarine

Lifer
Sep 10, 2004
10,507
0
0
Durr. yeap.
Although at 2.7 GHz I reached 6408 with the same video card and 1 GB of ram.
 

JBT

Lifer
Nov 28, 2001
12,094
1
81
I havn't run it in a LONG time but I think my system was in the 6000-6100 range. So I'd say your spot on, the only differences in our set up might be drivers which can easily make up the 100-200 difference.
 

SophalotJack

Banned
Jan 6, 2006
1,252
0
0
yes, for the OP's specs... I would say that his scores are spot on.

my highest score was ~8200 when I had my card OC'd. It got knocked down to 7400 range when I put it back to stock.

 

Dman877

Platinum Member
Jan 15, 2004
2,707
0
0
I get 6150 with my proc at 2.4 and gpu at 520/540. You might wanna oc your gpu a bit.
 

jlbenedict

Banned
Jul 10, 2005
3,724
0
0
Looks about right.

My X800GTO @ XT speeds pushes the 6000 mark... If I really push it, I'm well over 6000
 

chocoruacal

Golden Member
Nov 12, 2002
1,197
0
0
Doesn't 3DMark have a nifty function that allows you to compare your system with similar systems via their online database?
 

jlbenedict

Banned
Jul 10, 2005
3,724
0
0
Originally posted by: chocoruacal
Doesn't 3DMark have a nifty function that allows you to compare your system with similar systems via their online database?

I don't believe the free/trial version does
 

RollWave

Diamond Member
May 20, 2003
4,201
3
81
my X800XT PE doesnt have any headroom for OCing I think. It artifacted quite easily when I used the ATITool OC tool.
 

Crescent13

Diamond Member
Jan 12, 2005
4,793
1
0
Originally posted by: rnp614
I even put on a Zalman VF700!!! Still nothing!!!


Some people just get unlucky. I know. I got a Opty 165 stepping that was so good it was supposed to get to 2.6GHz easily, and I had a Zalman CNPS9500 and everything, I got to 2.2GHz before it started crashing.