Is 3DM2003 the new video benchmarking standard? What's your score?

[MichaelD]

Some interesting results. At least we've established that 3DMark2003 relies almost completely on Hardware DX9 support to run...almost at all! Thanks for the replies! 🙂

 

[DAPUNISHER]

Originally posted by: MichaelD
Some interesting results. At least we've established that 3DMark2003 relies almost completely on Hardware DX9 support to run...almost at all! Thanks for the replies! 🙂

Worst part is that some will feel the need to upgrade because of it believing they won't be able to play the latest titles without the hardware support for DX9. How many games even use DX8 now that are worthwhile? NEways....

2.4B@3ghz,167fsb,DDR418,G3 ti200@235/540 for test=1280

 

[Megatomic]

Rig in sig scored 1876 3DMarks. And why does this crappy program, new as it is, even try to detect what hardware and clockspeed I have if it is not going to get it right at all?

 

[microAmp]

I ran it when it first came out with a 1600+ o/c @1.75 GHz and 9700 Pro, got about 4800 or so.


Edit: 1600+ not 1400+

 

[XBoxLPU]

5018

See sig

 

[Dark4ng3l]

You guys realise that new nvidia driver cheat on 3dmark right?

 

[teckmaster]

its the standard as long as you have a Radeon Graphics card

 

[JediJorgie]

Originally posted by: EdipisReks

Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire

Originally posted by: EdipisReks
well, i get 5000 or so in 3dmark2003, so my epen0s is about a mile long.

Your mother must be proud, Oedipus.

*da da dum ching*

- M4H

yuckity yuck. i wonder what kinda movie they could make with Oedipus Rex and company and Elektra and company. *rubs chin thoughtfully*

thats pretty sick chubs.

i also have a question. i have a GF4 Ti4400 now, since it doesnt support DX9, will games that require DX9, e.g. Star Wars Galaxies (which is finally coming out next week) look really crappy?

 

[joeryu]

my highest score is around ~6500. compare link is in my sig.

my rig:

p4 2.6c @ 255 fsb = 3315 mhz
abit ic7 w/1GB xms@ ddr 408
radeon 9800 pro @ 425/380

 

[Ronin]

9800 Pro 3dMark2k3 - 6339
5800 Ultra 3dMark2k3 - 5841
9700 Pro 3dMark2k3 - 4772
5800 Ultra 3dMark2k1 - 17032
9800 Pro 3dMark2k1 - 17672
9700 Pro 3dMark2k1 - 15298

 

[Ronin]

Originally posted by: jOjO316
my highest score is around ~6500. compare link is in my sig.

my rig:

p4 2.6c @ 255 fsb = 3315 mhz
abit ic7 w/1GB xms@ ddr 408
radeon 9800 pro @ 425/380

Your link doesn't work 🙂

 

[MistaTastyCakes]

2.4B @ 2.76, Ti4400.. 1682! L337!

As long as it runs Raven Shield and Generals I don't care 😛

You guys realise that new nvidia driver cheat on 3dmark right?

NO WAY!! WHAT? There have been NO threads posted on these boards about that!! This is NEWS!

 

[Ronin]

Odd how he didn't mention ATi was caught doing the same thing.

And that Futuremark stated it wasn't a cheat, but rather it was considered an optimization.

 

[m1ke101]

Originally posted by: RoninCS
Odd how he didn't mention ATi was caught doing the same thing. And that Futuremark stated it wasn't a cheat, but rather it was considered an optimization.

hahahaha "optimization". You backing that bs?

 

[squidman]

Yo foos! 4500 at all-around stock! Powercolor rulezzzzz!

 

[Ryan]

Originally posted by: SgtZulu
my epen0s is this big: 8==================D

Bwahahahahaha - best post evAr!!!! 😉

 

[Gravija]

HOW DO YOU GUYS GET 4000+
im getting 3750 avg on my 9500 pro (stock, if i use diff BIOS, goes down to about 2750 @ 300/300)
NF7-S 2.0 200x11 1700+ t-bred

 

[vetteguy]

5460 last time I ran it.

 

[mikable]

Yet another useless mess of unrealistic numbers, from a benchmarking program that gets way to much notice for the good (or bad) it does.