Is 12 phase VRM worth $60 over 6 phase VRM?

ensign_lee

Senior member
Feb 9, 2011
401
0
0
So I was looking at two boards, the main difference that I can see being 12 phase VRM vs 6 phase VRM (other improvements I doubt I'm going to use).

Does a 12 phase VRM allow for better overclocking? And if so, enough to the point where it's worth about a $60 premium?
 

Athadeus

Senior member
Feb 29, 2004
587
0
71
Only if you're putting $600+ worth of CPU(s) in it imo. All other thing being equal quality wise, 12 phase would be better for overclocking.
 

Hogan773

Senior member
Nov 2, 2010
599
0
0
Is this SandyBridge? I'm not sure that a super-duper power phase is necessary for overclocking SB chips.
 

bryanl

Golden Member
Oct 15, 2006
1,157
8
81
All other factors being equal, 12-phase subjects the components of each phase to half the current of 6-phase, which may be desirable since many CPU voltage regulators are now run at close to maximum capacity, as demonstrated by overclocking-related explosions of capacitors. However I would put more weight on the maximum CPU power rating of each motherboard.
 

ensign_lee

Senior member
Feb 9, 2011
401
0
0
To answer your question, yes, this is Sandy Bridge. Sorry for leaving that out.

Will be overclocking an i5-2500k. Essentially would love to achieve the same overclock that I have now with a lower voltage if that was an effect of doubling the phase VRM.
 

Concillian

Diamond Member
May 26, 2004
3,751
8
81
It results in slightly more stable voltage, and technically "better" overclocking. A $60 premium worth? Not unless you're very serious about overclocking and need the absolute max. An on-air overclock will not be a problem for a 6-phase. You might lose 100 MHz due to 6 phase vs. 12 phase. You might end up at exactly the same. It's not something major unless you're going for records.

I wouldn't spend $60 for that feature alone. But that's just me.
 
Last edited:

xd_1771

Member
Sep 19, 2010
72
0
0
www.youtube.com
Actually now that I think of it... $60. He's right. I normally suggest 8+2 boards vs 4+1 boards (on AMD platforms) when they're the same price, and they usually are, but that's it.
 

ensign_lee

Senior member
Feb 9, 2011
401
0
0
Gigabyte P67 UD3 vs ASUS P8P67 Pro (or for that matter the Gig P67 UD4)

Yeah, the second two boards offer x8 x8 SLI / Crossfire, but I really only ever plan on using 1 GPU, so...
 

BoozeCompany

Member
Jan 6, 2011
39
0
0
Both are good.

ASUS offers DIGI+ vrm, it's the pros of a digital vrm combined with the pros of a analog vrm. So that is different than the Gigabyte board. Dont know if it really is better.
 

wwswimming

Banned
Jan 21, 2006
3,702
1
0
So I was looking at two boards, the main difference that I can see being 12 phase VRM vs 6 phase VRM (other improvements I doubt I'm going to use).

Does a 12 phase VRM allow for better overclocking? And if so, enough to the point where it's worth about a $60 premium?

not necessarily. # of phases alone is not what enables OC'ing.

remember the DFI Ultra-D, the Monster OC'er from about 2005-2006 for Socket 939 ?

i don't think that one had 12 phases.