is 1.7v too high for s754 newcastle

CKXP

Senior member
Nov 20, 2005
926
0
0
right now my 3200 newcastle is running @2640 240x11, but i need 1.7v to keep it stable. is that too high or still within safe limits?
 

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
22,901
12,967
136
That's pretty damn high, but Newcastles can take more volts than 90nm parts. How high can you get it at 1.6 or 1.65v?
 

zizo

Member
May 9, 2005
189
0
0
1.65v might be ok if you can keep it cool, but I can't keep my newcastle below 55C after 1.625V on air. I bet you have to use an extra .075V just for that last 40mhz.
 

CKXP

Senior member
Nov 20, 2005
926
0
0
Originally posted by: DrMrLordX
That's pretty damn high, but Newcastles can take more volts than 90nm parts. How high can you get it at 1.6 or 1.65v?

@1.6-1.65v it will do 2550mhz

edit: right now it idles at 39c, (thermalright xp-90)

 

KBTuning

Senior member
Mar 22, 2005
357
0
0
1.7 is a TON... keep it below 1.65 and more like 1.6 if you can... that is unless you change CPU's like your underwear....
 

aka1nas

Diamond Member
Aug 30, 2001
4,335
1
0
Originally posted by: KBTuning
1.7 is a TON... keep it below 1.65 and more like 1.6 if you can... that is unless you change CPU's like your underwear....

This is a newcastle, a .13 micron chip. The rule of thumb was to definately keep it below 1.8v. Personally, 1.65v is more reasonable on air cooling.

.09micron chips can't handle nor do they need as much voltage as they are manufactured on a smaller process.
 

Leper Messiah

Banned
Dec 13, 2004
7,973
8
0
I ran 1.9vcore through a clawhammer for about a month, and it was okay...I'd say 1.7 is fine. .13 process is the same as bartons and they were okay up to 2.0vcore...
 

CKXP

Senior member
Nov 20, 2005
926
0
0
Originally posted by: Leper Messiah
I ran 1.9vcore through a clawhammer for about a month, and it was okay...I'd say 1.7 is fine. .13 process is the same as bartons and they were okay up to 2.0vcore...

thanks, Leper Messiah that's what i needed to hear, but i'm gonna drop it back down to 2550mhz 1.6v, and thanks for everybody's input, i'm sure 1.7 isn't going to kill it overnite, but better safe than sorry(i need it til next Dec)



 

Zap

Elite Member
Oct 13, 1999
22,377
7
81
Originally posted by: CKXP
i'm gonna drop it back down to 2550mhz 1.6v, and thanks for everybody's input, i'm sure 1.7 isn't going to kill it overnite, but better safe than sorry(i need it til next Dec)

That's what I say. Seems like oftentimes a CPU will clock to so high on default voltage, then a bit higher with a slight bump, but then to get even more starts taking bigger jumps in voltage. What I do is to stay ahead of that curve.