TerryMathews
Lifer
- Oct 9, 1999
- 11,464
- 2
- 0
So were they beaten into submission after 500+ posts or are they thinking it is what it looks like?Funny how all the Obamabots turned tail and ran.
Funny how all the Obamabots turned tail and ran.
Prior to the eruption of the IRS controversy last spring, the IRS had a policy of backing up the data on its email server (which runs Microsoft Outlook) every day. It kept a backup of the records for six months on digital tape, according to a letter sent from the IRS to Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Orrin Hatch (R-Utah). After six months, the IRS would reuse those tapes for newer backups.
The IRS also had two other policies that complicated things. The first was a limit on how big its employees' email inboxes could be. At the IRS, employees could keep 500 megabytes of data on the email server. If the mailbox got too big, email would need to be deleted or moved to a local folder on the user's computer.
Emails considered an "official record" of the IRS couldn't be deleted and, in fact, needed to also have a hard copy filed.
Funny how all the Obamabots turned tail and ran.
Nope just waiting for this to be a scandal that links Obama.
So what you're saying is that you're not the least bit offended that your intelligence is being insulted by excuses that are both extraordinarily unlikely and violations of the law?
Odd, I thought you were totally righteous when there were "issues" getting Karl Rove's emails. I guess partisans will be partisans.
you and your type dont need answers to get riled up and support your team so all the republicans
What's my type, who's my team, and why are you calling me a republican?
What's my type, who's my team, and why are you calling me a republican?
Why in the world would you offer Lerner immunity when it's becoming onsite l obvious she broke the law?It's an issue caused directly by congress by forcing an entity to do something it shouldn't be doing (ie judging whether an entities "primary" focus is political or not).
The "investigation" itself can be blown wide open by offering Lerner immunity (she offered to testify before without immunity but was denied), if there is wrong doing above and beyond the IRS then this should be the next logical step. It's not moving forward because it doesn't need to, you and your type dont need answers to get riled up and support your team so all the republicans have to do is drag this out because you lemmings will follow them.
It's funny that you talk about your intelligence being insulted and yet that's exactly what's been happening since this "scandal" started.
Let me know when something goes to court![]()
Nope just waiting for this to be a scandal that links Obama. Mean while we are enjoying you guys chomp at the latest bit of red meat thrown your way. I guess your masters figured you'd need a bone.
Why in the world would you offer Lerner immunity when it's becoming onsite l obvious she broke the law?
house cuts irs budget 15% hahahahahahaha
It's an issue caused directly by congress by forcing an entity to do something it shouldn't be doing (ie judging whether an entities "primary" focus is political or not).
The "investigation" itself can be blown wide open by offering Lerner immunity (she offered to testify before without immunity but was denied), if there is wrong doing above and beyond the IRS then this should be the next logical step. It's not moving forward because it doesn't need to, you and your type dont need answers to get riled up and support your team so all the republicans have to do is drag this out because you lemmings will follow them.
It's funny that you talk about your intelligence being insulted and yet that's exactly what's been happening since this "scandal" started.
Let me know when something goes to court![]()
Why in the world would you offer Lerner immunity when it's becoming onsite l obvious she broke the law?
Sheep!!!
"Snipe hunt"? How many thousands of emails are missing at this point?It happens all the time in serious & honest criminal investigations. It's not obvious that she broke the law, either, other than to True Believers like yourself.
Repubs never find the truth when conspiracy theory better serves their purposes. They're quite adept at perpetual political snipe hunts.
