Steorn is making three claims for its technology:
1. The technology has a coefficient of performance greater than 100%.
2. The operation of the technology (i.e. the creation of energy) is not derived from the degradation of its component parts.
3. There is no identifiable environmental source of the energy (as might be witnessed by a cooling of ambient air temperature).
Originally posted by: NoMoMoney
Looks like a great way to collect e-mail addresses. Already have 2000 people signed up to get results. The only result they will get is spam.
Originally posted by: lokiju
Originally posted by: NoMoMoney
Looks like a great way to collect e-mail addresses. Already have 2000 people signed up to get results. The only result they will get is spam.
I was thinking the same thing.
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: lokiju
Originally posted by: NoMoMoney
Looks like a great way to collect e-mail addresses. Already have 2000 people signed up to get results. The only result they will get is spam.
I was thinking the same thing.
until a credible news agency runs this story shenny shen shens and a bottle of shens
Originally posted by: loup garou
It runs on whiskey...
Steorn?s technology appears to violate the ?Principle of the Conservation of Energy?, considered by many to be the most fundamental principle in our current understanding of the universe. This principle is stated simply as ?energy can neither be created nor destroyed, it can only change form?.
Steorn is making three claims for its technology:
1. The technology has a coefficient of performance greater than 100%.
2. The operation of the technology (i.e. the creation of energy) is not derived from the degradation of its component parts.
3. There is no identifiable environmental source of the energy (as might be witnessed by a cooling of ambient air temperature).
The sum of these claims is that our technology creates free energy.
Originally posted by: uhohs
Originally posted by: loup garou
It runs on whiskey...
haha, beat me to the alcohol joke. 🙁
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: lokiju
Originally posted by: NoMoMoney
Looks like a great way to collect e-mail addresses. Already have 2000 people signed up to get results. The only result they will get is spam.
I was thinking the same thing.
until a credible news agency runs this story shenny shen shens and a bottle of shens
Originally posted by: Jeff7
From the site:
"The technology has a coefficient of performance greater than 100%."
Right. I'm quite sure it does.
"There is no identifiable environmental source of the energy (as might be witnessed by a cooling of ambient air temperature)."
So the energy just comes out of nowhere? Did they recreate the source of the Big Bang, right in the lab?
They don't really say anywhere what the technology actually is. The closest I could find is this:
"Steorn?s technology is based on the interaction of magnetic fields and allows the production of clean, free and constant energy."
They didn't even use the words "quantum" or "nanotechnology" or "spacetime" anywhere in there. Who are they fooling?
Their press release video features cartoonish animations of oil mining, and the impact on wildlife. That's the first 45 seconds.
The next 30 seconds talk about needing to replace traditional energy sources, and then they begin to talk about the techgnology that "can change everyone's life." And then they name a bunch of devices that happen to use energy - cars, phones, etc. Then there's an animation of a little green donut going round and round between 3 horseshoe magnets. One person likens it to being able to walk up a hill, and come back down, and wind up with more energy than when you started.
Apparently, it is so controversial an idea, that they need to validate it behind closed doors.😕 Would it not make more sense to just let magazines try it out and review it, to show it to the world all the sooner, and not sound so shady about it? Oh that's right, it's complete BS, so they wouldn't want to do that.
Nowhere in the video do they really say what the "technology" is, other than that little green donut animation. Gee, I wonder why no one is taking them seriously?
Originally posted by: Heisenberg
/runs BS flag up the pole