• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Iraqi terrorists

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
i requested a few times that he further explain his post, but he doesn't even acknowledge my requests. either i'm invisible or he's just being an idiot and looking for a fight
 
Originally posted by: element
You're right it's like peeing into the wind talking to a bunch of 13 year old weenies with no comprehension skills whatsoever.

A. stfu.
B. piss off.
C go f_ yourself in bed with a friggin dirty old sock around your 2" trouser buddy.
Click to expand...

Suggesting some of that stuff to a 13 year old could be grounds for some serious charges being leveled against you. Are you prepared to face those consequences?
 
Originally posted by: kogase
Originally posted by: element
You're right it's like peeing into the wind talking to a bunch of 13 year old weenies with no comprehension skills whatsoever.

A. stfu.
B. piss off.
C go f_ yourself in bed with a friggin dirty old sock around your 2" trouser buddy.
Click to expand...

Suggesting some of that stuff to a 13 year old could be grounds for some serious charges being leveled against you. Are you prepared to face those consequences?
Click to expand...


what did I suggest? Are you sure you have enough brain matter to figure it out? I am prepared for anything much less the likes of you. What does f___ stand for? Go find yourself? what is a trouser buddy but your hello kitty keychain?
 
Originally posted by: sierrita
Originally posted by: element
Originally posted by: sierrita
Originally posted by: element
Originally posted by: kogase
Guy makes preposterous argument. People point this out. Guy goes a little crazy. Hilarity ensues.
Click to expand...

If it is so preposterous, why can't you talk about why it is so? Calling it preposterous serves no more purpose than me calling you a bufoon. how about some reasoning as to why you think so?
Click to expand...




You seem to really like peeing into the wind tonight...rough day?


A. Hot bath.

B. Heavy meds.

C. Go to bed.
Click to expand...

You're right it's like peeing into the wind talking to a bunch of 13 year old weenies with no comprehension skills whatsoever.

A. stfu.
B. piss off.
C go f_ yourself in bed with a friggin dirty old sock around your 2" trouser buddy.
Click to expand...





I'm a girl, you creep.
Click to expand...

You're probably a middle aged male cretin pedofile for all I know. Creep away creep.
 
Originally posted by: KidViciou$
i requested a few times that he further explain his post, but he doesn't even acknowledge my requests. either i'm invisible or he's just being an idiot and looking for a fight
Click to expand...




Yes, he seems to be in it for the insults...


Sets up a flame-bait thread and sits back and makes enemies of all.


Fairly common syndrome.
 
Originally posted by: KidViciou$
i requested a few times that he further explain his post, but he doesn't even acknowledge my requests. either i'm invisible or he's just being an idiot and looking for a fight
Click to expand...

If you don't get it, there is no sense in trying to explain it to you. You won't be able to add anything to the discussion.
 
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: KidViciou$
i requested a few times that he further explain his post, but he doesn't even acknowledge my requests. either i'm invisible or he's just being an idiot and looking for a fight
Click to expand...




Yes, he seems to be in it for the insults...


Sets up a flame-bait thread and sits back and makes enemies of all.


Fairly common syndrome.
Click to expand...

It wasn't a flame bait thread until you flaming tards turned it into a flamefest from lack of proper social skills. Figures.
 
Originally posted by: element
Originally posted by: KidViciou$
i requested a few times that he further explain his post, but he doesn't even acknowledge my requests. either i'm invisible or he's just being an idiot and looking for a fight
Click to expand...

If you don't get it, there is no sense in trying to explain it to you. You won't be able to add anything to the discussion.
Click to expand...

what do u have to lose by trying?


edit: you know what? i gave you too much credit, i see now that was your entire thought and i have to tell you, no, youre wrong
 
Originally posted by: element
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: KidViciou$
i requested a few times that he further explain his post, but he doesn't even acknowledge my requests. either i'm invisible or he's just being an idiot and looking for a fight
Click to expand...




Yes, he seems to be in it for the insults...


Sets up a flame-bait thread and sits back and makes enemies of all.


Fairly common syndrome.
Click to expand...

It wasn't a flame bait thread until you flaming tards turned it into a flamefest from lack of proper social skills. Figures.
Click to expand...





It's always someone else's fault, isn't it?
 
btw, if the attacks in other countries were because of iraq solely, why wasn't the US hit? the reason why is because it's not just about iraq. the terrorists see it as an attack on islam. the reason we weren't hit is because it takes much more planning to hit us than other countries


and condoleeza rice even said that there was no link between al-qaeda and sadaam hussein. instead of attempting to think you should listen to the news every once in a whiel
 
Originally posted by: KidViciou$
btw, if the attacks in other countries were because of iraq solely, why wasn't the US hit? the reason why is because it's not just about iraq. the terrorists see it as an attack on islam. the reason we weren't hit is because it takes much more planning to hit us than other countries


and condoleeza rice even said that there was no link between al-qaeda and sadaam hussein. instead of attempting to think you should listen to the news every once in a whiel
Click to expand...









I'm hearing crickets in here.


😉
 
Originally posted by: KidViciou$
btw, if the attacks in other countries were because of iraq solely, why wasn't the US hit? the reason why is because it's not just about iraq. the terrorists see it as an attack on islam. the reason we weren't hit is because it takes much more planning to hit us than other countries


and condoleeza rice even said that there was no link between al-qaeda and sadaam hussein. instead of attempting to think you should listen to the news every once in a whiel
Click to expand...


well at least you gave it a try. I give you props for that. So you finally did get it, what I was saying? Now that wasn't so hard was it? You might actually get some respect now. Go figure.

I will answer like this: You should not only listen to the news every once in a while, but think for yourself as well. At no point in time did I mention anything about Saddam Hussein. He is out of the picture now. My statement was trying to back up a link between the terrorists and Iraq. By that I mean The Iraqi people. People who reside or did once reside in Iraq.

As for why we weren't hit. I don't presume to know why the terrorists choose the targets they choose, and when they choose them. Perhaps as you said because security in the U.S. is tighter now since 911. Besides the terrorists did lop off the heads of some U.S. citizens abroad, so in part, your statement of why we weren't terrorized post 911 isn't true. We were.
 
Originally posted by: element
Originally posted by: KidViciou$
btw, if the attacks in other countries were because of iraq solely, why wasn't the US hit? the reason why is because it's not just about iraq. the terrorists see it as an attack on islam. the reason we weren't hit is because it takes much more planning to hit us than other countries


and condoleeza rice even said that there was no link between al-qaeda and sadaam hussein. instead of attempting to think you should listen to the news every once in a whiel
Click to expand...


well at least you gave it a try. I give you props for that. So you finally did get it, what I was saying? Now that wasn't so hard was it? You might actually get some respect now. Go figure.

I will answer like this: You should not only listen to the news every once in a while, but think for yourself as well. At no point in time did I mention anything about Saddam Hussein. He is out of the picture now. My statement was trying to back up a link between the terrorists and Iraq. By that I mean The Iraqi people. People who reside or did once reside in Iraq.

As for why we weren't hit. I don't presume to know why the terrorists choose the targets they choose, and when they choose them. Perhaps as you said because security in the U.S. is tighter now since 911. Besides the terrorists did lop off the heads of some U.S. citizens abroad, so in part, your statement of why we weren't terrorized post 911 isn't true. We were.
Click to expand...





Pretzel-Logic.


I think he's drunk.
 
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: element
Originally posted by: KidViciou$
btw, if the attacks in other countries were because of iraq solely, why wasn't the US hit? the reason why is because it's not just about iraq. the terrorists see it as an attack on islam. the reason we weren't hit is because it takes much more planning to hit us than other countries


and condoleeza rice even said that there was no link between al-qaeda and sadaam hussein. instead of attempting to think you should listen to the news every once in a whiel
Click to expand...


well at least you gave it a try. I give you props for that. So you finally did get it, what I was saying? Now that wasn't so hard was it? You might actually get some respect now. Go figure.

I will answer like this: You should not only listen to the news every once in a while, but think for yourself as well. At no point in time did I mention anything about Saddam Hussein. He is out of the picture now. My statement was trying to back up a link between the terrorists and Iraq. By that I mean The Iraqi people. People who reside or did once reside in Iraq.

As for why we weren't hit. I don't presume to know why the terrorists choose the targets they choose, and when they choose them. Perhaps as you said because security in the U.S. is tighter now since 911. Besides the terrorists did lop off the heads of some U.S. citizens abroad, so in part, your statement of why we weren't terrorized post 911 isn't true. We were.
Click to expand...





Pretzel-Logic.


I think he's drunk.
Click to expand...

You're an ass. A stupid one at that if your miniscule brain got twisted like a pretzel from such simple logic.
 
how could the iraqi people be in cohoots with the terrorists? they would need a "point man"

and like i said, the terrorists are "fighting" for the iraqis, whether they like it or not


i understood that as your original argument, but like i said originally, your reasoning was disjoint
 
Originally posted by: KidViciou$
how could the iraqi people be in cohoots with the terrorists? they would need a "point man"

and like i said, the terrorists are "fighting" for the iraqis, whether they like it or not...t
Click to expand...

Exactly. the terrorists are fighting for the Iraqis. Why would they do that if there were no ties between them? That is all I was trying to say.

 
Originally posted by: element
Originally posted by: KidViciou$
how could the iraqi people be in cohoots with the terrorists? they would need a "point man"

and like i said, the terrorists are "fighting" for the iraqis, whether they like it or not...t
Click to expand...

Exactly. the terrorists are fighting for the Iraqis. Why would they do that if there were no ties between them? That is all I was trying to say.
Click to expand...

that's still wrong, i said they are fighting in the name of the iraqis whether they like it or not. and the only tie between them is that they are muslim
 
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: conjur
This thread needs to be locked just for sheer stupidity.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/asia_pacific/2002/bali/default.stm
BBC News Online collects news, analysis and features from the terror attack in Bali on 12 October, 2002
Click to expand...
When did the US invade Iraq? Hmm???
Click to expand...




What? Haven't you been following this?

It is WE who are stupid and cannot follow the simple indisputable logic of element.

We All should be banned...NOT HIM!
Click to expand...


All you've done is thread crap. Contributed nothing to the discussion. You SHOULD be banned. If you disagree with me that's fine, but you don't have to be a thread crapping ass about it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top