Originally posted by: flavio
A "liberate" them whether they like it or not approach eh?
Originally posted by: MachFive
Flavio, the question is f*cking irrelevant.
His people WANT him out of there. Period.
The reason they haven't been gushing with support is because the UN made us screw them over once already. Not only that, but the Fedayeen blends in with the rest of them, threatening to execute them and their loved ones if they speak out against him. This isn't theory, it's fact.
They're even afraid to tell their relatives calling from America why they can't leave Baghdad. It's because if they do, they'll be shot in the back by the Fedayeen. They live in constant fear that their phone conversations, their homes, their places of work, that all of them are being constantly monitored.
These people are waiting until we PROVE to them that we're here for good, that they'll no longer be living under the thumb of a meglomaniacal tyrant, and THEN we'll have their full support. Already, cities that are nearly secure are beginning to show signs of supporting the troops.
The majority want freedom. Period. And they f*cking deserve it.
Originally posted by: Staley8
But on the other hand (which is where I lean towards) even if there are say 30% of the civilians that want freedom from Saddam don't you think those innocent peopel are worth fighting for?
You're wasting your breath. Some people just refuse to see the thousands celebrating the Americans in Najaf as proof that the Iraqi people are desperate to be rid of Saddam.Originally posted by: MachFive
Flavio, the question is f*cking irrelevant.
His people WANT him out of there. Period.
The reason they haven't been gushing with support is because the UN made us screw them over once already. Not only that, but the Fedayeen blends in with the rest of them, threatening to execute them and their loved ones if they speak out against him. This isn't theory, it's fact.
They're even afraid to tell their relatives calling from America why they can't leave Baghdad. It's because if they do, they'll be shot in the back by the Fedayeen. They live in constant fear that their phone conversations, their homes, their places of work, that all of them are being constantly monitored.
These people are waiting until we PROVE to them that we're here for good, that they'll no longer be living under the thumb of a meglomaniacal tyrant, and THEN we'll have their full support. Already, cities that are nearly secure are beginning to show signs of supporting the troops.
The majority want freedom. Period. And they f*cking deserve it.
Originally posted by: flavio
Here's some more good reading on the subject.
Lots of generalizations and name-calling going on there. You are proving yourself to be a bit of a troll and someone who just will not listen to any type of rebuttal.Originally posted by: Pers
wow... a bunch of neo-conservative rednecks are unfamiliar with the idea of a person having an Iraqi father (emigrate to Iran) and marry an Iranian Mother.
I guess since most of you seem to be the type to marry your cousins and whatnot -- this idea must be foreign -- disturbing eh?
anyway... what i meant with Iraqis supporting Saddam is -- THey rather see Saddam in power -- than another puppet regime...
The news papers may be asking a bunch of - liquor store - owning Arab/Iraqi-Chaldeans who know about as much about politics
to get away with tax fraud. Other than that -- their support for America means nothing. Anyone that knows sh!t about
your track record - by that - i mean your eagerness to carry out the White MANS' Burdern --"arrogant nation" -- knows that you seek to
do nothing but place a Karzai regime, as you did in Afghanistan. How much more liberated is Afghanistan today than it was under
the taliban? I would like first hand accounts, and not CNN postings please.
And that's a valid point. I've posted before that many Iraqis express concern and some even a fear of what America's intentions are. That's I hope that Bush hands over control to a UN/Iraqi collaboration once things stabilize after Baghdad falls. I don't want the U.S. leading anything to govern Iraq.Originally posted by: flavio
The question isn't whether they love Hussein, but whether they prefer America's control.
Too bad overthrowing Hitler came at the cost of millions of dead Russians and the installation of oppressive regimes throughout Eastern Europe.The question wasn't directed at me, but I'll answer it. YES, b/c Saddam's views & actions, just like Hitler's views and actions were pure evil and were intended to cause fear, suffering, and death. I support the overthrow of that regardless of how many followers he has