Iraq Operation Lightning: The Results

[TastesLikeChicken]

Originally posted by: umbrella39

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: conjur
That article didn't say the other 95 had been charged. They could very well end up being released, too.

You can always hope. Keep your fingers crossed and say your prayers to Allah and just maybe....

Fvck off

Agree TLC, fvck off. You are a false patriot and an asshole when you say crap like that. Grow up little eSoldier. What possible pleasure do you derive from calling anti Iraq war Americans, Allah worshipers?

It's no different than calling someone a Bush apologist or claiming their nose is stuck up Bush's ass. So deal with it. If you and others like you are going to dish it out that kind of garbage constantly then you better damn well be ready to take the same kind of BS back.

Or don't you recognize your own style of hyperbole?

 

[umbrella39]

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: umbrella39

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: conjur
That article didn't say the other 95 had been charged. They could very well end up being released, too.

You can always hope. Keep your fingers crossed and say your prayers to Allah and just maybe....

Fvck off

Agree TLC, fvck off. You are a false patriot and an asshole when you say crap like that. Grow up little eSoldier. What possible pleasure do you derive from calling anti Iraq war Americans, Allah worshipers?

It's no different than calling someone a Bush apologist or claiming their nose is stuck up Bush's ass. So deal with it. If you and others like you are going to dish it out that kind of garbage constantly then you better damn well be ready to take the same kind of BS back.

Or don't you recognize your own style of hyperbole?

Not even close but I expect crap to come out of your hole since you are so full of it to begin with. Congrats, you are batting 1.000 today.

Thanks for admitting to the class that you worship and pray to GWB. Since you are comparing him to Allah now. :roll:

 

[TastesLikeChicken]

Originally posted by: umbrella39

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: umbrella39

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: conjur
That article didn't say the other 95 had been charged. They could very well end up being released, too.

You can always hope. Keep your fingers crossed and say your prayers to Allah and just maybe....

Fvck off

Agree TLC, fvck off. You are a false patriot and an asshole when you say crap like that. Grow up little eSoldier. What possible pleasure do you derive from calling anti Iraq war Americans, Allah worshipers?

It's no different than calling someone a Bush apologist or claiming their nose is stuck up Bush's ass. So deal with it. If you and others like you are going to dish it out that kind of garbage constantly then you better damn well be ready to take the same kind of BS back.

Or don't you recognize your own style of hyperbole?

Not even close but I expect crap to come out of your hole since you are so full of it to begin with. Congrats, you are batting 1.000 today.

Thanks for admitting to the class that you worship and pray to GWB. Since you are comparing him to Allah now. :roll:

LOL!

What a sad little dreg of humanity you are.

 

[umbrella39]

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: umbrella39

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: umbrella39

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: conjur
That article didn't say the other 95 had been charged. They could very well end up being released, too.

You can always hope. Keep your fingers crossed and say your prayers to Allah and just maybe....

Fvck off

Agree TLC, fvck off. You are a false patriot and an asshole when you say crap like that. Grow up little eSoldier. What possible pleasure do you derive from calling anti Iraq war Americans, Allah worshipers?

It's no different than calling someone a Bush apologist or claiming their nose is stuck up Bush's ass. So deal with it. If you and others like you are going to dish it out that kind of garbage constantly then you better damn well be ready to take the same kind of BS back.

Or don't you recognize your own style of hyperbole?

Not even close but I expect crap to come out of your hole since you are so full of it to begin with. Congrats, you are batting 1.000 today.

Thanks for admitting to the class that you worship and pray to GWB. Since you are comparing him to Allah now. :roll:

LOL!

What a sad little dreg of humanity you are.

What a waste of human flesh you are. Don't forget to pray tonight.

 

[umbrella39]

If you want to get the last one in, go ahead. I am tired and it seems that I may have already won $10 Million dollars. So I have to sleep and figure out how I am going to spend all that money.

 

[Votingisanillusion]

Originally posted by: yllus
This just in: The Pentagon has killed more people than Mao's China and Stalin's Russia combined! Experts now vainly searching for the birth and deathplace of each of these poor victims to backup wild claims made by some guy on an Internet forum.

Stalin died more than 50 years ago, in 1953.
Mao was responsible for the death of his own people.
The Pentagon and the CIA killed millions of innocent people all over the World, and put into power countless dictators who themselves had millions of people killed (Saddam, the Shah of Iran,...). From a global perspective, they are the worst scums on Earth of the past 50 years.

 

[TastesLikeChicken]

Originally posted by: Votingisanillusion

Originally posted by: yllus
This just in: The Pentagon has killed more people than Mao's China and Stalin's Russia combined! Experts now vainly searching for the birth and deathplace of each of these poor victims to backup wild claims made by some guy on an Internet forum.

Stalin died more than 50 years ago, in 1953.
Mao was responsible for the death of his own people.
The Pentagon and the CIA killed millions of innocent people all over the World, and put into power countless dictators who themselves had millions of people killed (Saddam, the Shah of Iran,...). From a global perspective, they are the worst scums on Earth of the past 50 years.

You can't even get your history right. Despite the ravings of the loonie left, the US did not put Hussein or the Shah into power.

I doubt you're seriously interested in any sort of facts though, so it was probably useless to tell you this since you'll just claim it's all some big cover-up or conspiracy.

 

[Steeplerot]

:roll: more revisionist rantings from someone too drunk on kool aid to remember a ounce of his own country's history...

Let's see your burden of of disproof of the commonly accepted fact worldwide that the cia backed the coups of 63 and 68 in iraq then.

The cia was paying saddams freaking rent in egypt and training him after the coup of 63 failed, before he headed back out to iraq for the succesful 68 coup supplied with us arms...

or is this just another one of your either foxnews, limbaugh, freeper type iran contra bald face lie/denials? once again dredging up more fantasyland right wing crap trying to whitewash history...

 

[TastesLikeChicken]

Originally posted by: Steeplerot
:roll: more revisionist rantings from someone too drunk on kool aid to remember a ounce of his own country's history...

Let's see your burden of of disproof of the commonly accepted fact worldwide that the cia backed the coups of 63 and 68 in iraq then.

"Commonly accepted fact?"

LOL.

This so called "commonly accepted fact" is a regurgitation of the claims of one single man (Roger Morris) who didn't actually ever see the supposed CIA involvement, but was told this was the case. So because one guy makes the claim, the left takes off running with it as absolute truth.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/042203B.shtml

The cia was paying saddams freaking rent in egypt and training him after the coup of 63 failed, before he headed back out to iraq for the succesful 68 coup supplied with us arms...

Proof?

or is this just another one of your either foxnews, limbaugh, freeper type iran contra bald face lie/denials? once again dredging up more fantasyland right wing crap trying to whitewash history...

Is this another of your commondreams, democratic underground, loonie left claims?

See how easy that kind of childish bullsh!t is?

Grow the fvck up, asswipe.

---

More like that, and you will have pleny of time to wipe your ass elsewhere. This is your ONE warning.

AnandTech Moderator

 

[Steeplerot]

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: Votingisanillusion
US corporate media are merely parrots for the Pentagon. The Pentagon has killed more millions of people around the World in the past 50 years than any other group of armed killers on Earth.
The Iraqi Resistance kills those bastards, the worst bastards since the Nazis.
Posting from uruknet is very different than posting fascist propaganda from the Pentagon's parrots.

:roll:

You are seriously fvcked up in the head.

And you seriously need to start using yours.

 

[Steeplerot]

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: Steeplerot
:roll: more revisionist rantings from someone too drunk on kool aid to remember a ounce of his own country's history...

Let's see your burden of of disproof of the commonly accepted fact worldwide that the cia backed the coups of 63 and 68 in iraq then.

"Commonly accepted fact?"

LOL.

This so called "commonly accepted fact" is a regurgitation of the claims of one single man (Roger Morris) who didn't actually ever see the supposed CIA involvement, but was told this was the case. So because one guy makes the claim, the left takes off running with it as absolute truth.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/042203B.shtml

The cia was paying saddams freaking rent in egypt and training him after the coup of 63 failed, before he headed back out to iraq for the succesful 68 coup supplied with us arms...

Proof?

or is this just another one of your either foxnews, limbaugh, freeper type iran contra bald face lie/denials? once again dredging up more fantasyland right wing crap trying to whitewash history...

Is this another of your commondreams, democratic underground, loonie left claims?

See how easy that kind of childish bullsh!t is?

Grow the fvck up, asswipe.

piss off you unamerican dickhead.....you can go sieg heil your ass off a cliff TLC, with the rest of your brainwashed dittohead mental "missing link" buddies.....

---

You, too. Cool down, or find another place to vent. Please do not force us to help you with that decision.

AnandTech Moderator

 

[TastesLikeChicken]

Originally posted by: Steeplerot

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: Steeplerot
:roll: more revisionist rantings from someone too drunk on kool aid to remember a ounce of his own country's history...

Let's see your burden of of disproof of the commonly accepted fact worldwide that the cia backed the coups of 63 and 68 in iraq then.

"Commonly accepted fact?"

LOL.

This so called "commonly accepted fact" is a regurgitation of the claims of one single man (Roger Morris) who didn't actually ever see the supposed CIA involvement, but was told this was the case. So because one guy makes the claim, the left takes off running with it as absolute truth.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/042203B.shtml

The cia was paying saddams freaking rent in egypt and training him after the coup of 63 failed, before he headed back out to iraq for the succesful 68 coup supplied with us arms...

Proof?

or is this just another one of your either foxnews, limbaugh, freeper type iran contra bald face lie/denials? once again dredging up more fantasyland right wing crap trying to whitewash history...

Is this another of your commondreams, democratic underground, loonie left claims?

See how easy that kind of childish bullsh!t is?

Grow the fvck up, asswipe.

piss off you unamerican dickhead.....you can go sieg heil your ass off a cliff TLC, with the rest of your brainwashed dittohead mental "missing link" buddies.....

Looks like our resident Punkie boy couldn't come up with anything to back up his arm-waving claims. No surprise. I knew it was BS anyway.

 

[Steeplerot]

you are not worth debating with, It's like talking to a fundie....a exercise in futility.

I am not going to waste my time, you get corrected and come right back with the same lie in a few days after you get bold listening to whatever kool-aid you get this crap from.

Just another sh1t-stirring troll. Do you even believe the crap you spew? or just another lonley old man seeking attention being pissed about everything like some right-wing drama queen.

Do us all a favor and stick to bingo TLC.

 

[TastesLikeChicken]

iow, you still got nothing in the way of proof for your claims?

Thought so.

 

[Steeplerot]

go get a new perscription on your reading glasses (minus the rush limbaugh bias bifocals lens) and read a history book dude.

 

[yllus]

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
iow, you still got nothing in the way of proof for your claims?

Are you serious? Steeplerot back up any of his conspiracy theories? Hell, forget Iraq - I'd like to see a smidgen of proof of any of the things he said in this thread for starters.

 

[Steeplerot]

yeah, let me go look up covert cia actions on the factbook website...:roll:

get a grip...I provide the most unbiased souces I have the time to look up for ones who ignore and attack the source anyway.

You people ignore the stuff from your own corporate media anyway...what is the point..like I said it's like talking to fundies...you people are cult-like in your goebbels-like distractions and spin.

Now if it was someone genuinely interested, sure.

 

[TastesLikeChicken]

Originally posted by: yllus

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
iow, you still got nothing in the way of proof for your claims?

Are you serious? Steeplerot back up any of his conspiracy theories? Hell, forget Iraq - I'd like to see a smidgen of proof of any of the things he said in this thread for starters.

How true. It seems he's more interested in spewing his juvenile, name-calling, accusatory garbage than any sort of proof of his claim.

 

[Steeplerot]

Becasue time for arguing to a dead wall is over... time for direct change and action, you people have shown your complacency and unwillingness to listen.

No I do not pussyfoot with fascists. I call them out. Time to drive the stake of democracy into your blackened hearts. -from a recent quote.

 

[cKGunslinger]

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: yllus

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
iow, you still got nothing in the way of proof for your claims?

Are you serious? Steeplerot back up any of his conspiracy theories? Hell, forget Iraq - I'd like to see a smidgen of proof of any of the things he said in this thread for starters.

How true. It seems he's more interested in spewing his juvenile, name-calling, accusatory garbage than any sort of proof of his claim.

Watch it, TLC. You've dipped into that well a bit yourself in this thread, have you not?

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Grow the fvck up, asswipe.

 

[TastesLikeChicken]

Listen to what? All your accusatory crap-flinging ad homs and squalid attempts at maligning everyone and anyone who doens't agree with your wild-eyed conspiracy tripe and bogus claims that you can't even seem to substantiate? Reality to you doesn't seem to be what exists, but is only what you can create in your own mind. And all you do is end up making yourself look like a fringe loonie in the majority of your responses.

How about showing some actual rational thought grounded in reality instead of the puffed-up "Everyone is a cretin except for me.' attitude? If you do, somebody might actually take you seriously some day.

 

[yllus]

You drive that stake, mascara boy. Let us know when that direct change and action is going to take place. We'll debate the merits of bailing you out of jail so you can further amuse us.

 

[TastesLikeChicken]

Originally posted by: cKGunslinger

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: yllus

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
iow, you still got nothing in the way of proof for your claims?

Are you serious? Steeplerot back up any of his conspiracy theories? Hell, forget Iraq - I'd like to see a smidgen of proof of any of the things he said in this thread for starters.

How true. It seems he's more interested in spewing his juvenile, name-calling, accusatory garbage than any sort of proof of his claim.

Watch it, TLC. You've dipped into that well a bit yourself in this thread, have you not?

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Grow the fvck up, asswipe.

Let's keep it in context:

Is this another of your commondreams, democratic underground, loonie left claims?

See how easy that kind of childish bullsh!t is?

Grow the fvck up, asswipe.

 

[RightIsWrong]

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Listen to what? All your accusatory crap-flinging ad homs and squalid attempts at maligning everyone and anyone who doens't agree with your wild-eyed conspiracy tripe and bogus claims that you can't even seem to substantiate? Reality to you doesn't seem to be what exists, but is only what you can create in your own mind. And all you do is end up making yourself look like a fringe loonie in the majority of your responses.

How about showing some actual rational thought grounded in reality instead of the puffed-up "Everyone is a cretin except for me.' attitude? If you do, somebody might actually take you seriously some day.

Unfortunately, TLC, when the documents are finally declassified that will provide the evidence one way or the other this topic will be long forgotten. Kinda like that quack dr. in the Shiavo case claiming to be a noble prize nominee....you can't prove me wrong so it must be true!

You were so absolutely certain that there were WMD in Iraq before and after the war without a shred of substantiated evidence except the words of a small group of people. Why is it so hard to believe that the same people that came up with that evidence, couldn't be responsible for this? Other than it would prove you wrong once again.

 

[yllus]

Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
You were so absolutely certain that there were WMD in Iraq before and after the war without a shred of substantiated evidence except the words of a small group of people. Why is it so hard to believe that the same people that came up with that evidence, couldn't be responsible for this? Other than it would prove you wrong once again.

Don't even the Downing Street Memos assert that Hussein had a significant stockpile of WMD? I believe the controversy is over whether or not his willingness to use them made Hussein into more of a threat than North Korea et al.

Edit: And I quote:

The Foreign Secretary said he would discuss this with Colin Powell this week. It seemed clear that Bush had made up his mind to take military action, even if the timing was not yet decided. But the case was thin. Saddam was not threatening his neighbours, and his WMD capability was less than that of Libya, North Korea or Iran. We should work up a plan for an ultimatum to Saddam to allow back in the UN weapons inspectors. This would also help with the legal justification for the use of force.

...

For instance, what were the consequences, if Saddam used WMD on day one, or if Baghdad did not collapse and urban warfighting began? You said that Saddam could also use his WMD on Kuwait. Or on Israel, added the Defence Secretary.