Iraq: No new UN resolutions
- Thread starter StageLeft
- Start date
Kerouactivist
Diamond Member
- Jul 12, 2001
- 4,665
- 0
- 76
Kerouactivist
Diamond Member
- Jul 12, 2001
- 4,665
- 0
- 76
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Saudi will not be attacked though
He is in the Air Force.
Do you think that this new annoucement will have any real effect on the situation, sometimes it seems to me that our administration is going to do WTF they want to do regardless of what the U.N., Iraq, or anybody for that matter says
- Sep 29, 2000
- 70,150
- 5
- 0
Well if Iraq truly will not sign any new UN resolution even if it's made my money is on the US attacking Iraq. I thought they would anyway because they would never comply to the intensity of a new UN resolution and all that it requires, but this just makes it easier to say they didn't and shortens the process right up. Instead of waiting months for them to agree and break a resolution now they are not even going to bother with one so the US can get right down to business of preparing an attack.Originally posted by: bthorny
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Saudi will not be attacked though
He is in the Air Force.
Do you think that this new annoucement will have any real effect on the situation, sometimes it seems to me that our administration is going to do WTF they want to do regardless of what the U.N., Iraq, or anybody for that matter says
I thought the original deal Saddam made with Annan when Saddam said he would allow weapons inspectors back in the country was based on the original resolution, not a new one.
Red Dawn
Elite Member
- Jun 4, 2001
- 57,529
- 3
- 0
On a side note I hear the Hussien is moving the Republican Guard out of Baghdad because he no longer trusts them not to overthrow him in case of a War. After what happened to them in the Gulf War that's probably a good idea. I bet we have all the RG Commanders Phone #
- Sep 29, 2000
- 70,150
- 5
- 0
Yeah it was based on the original. I think they are still agreeing to let them back in - but based on original terms of resolution not new ones which would say "if you screw us this time you're gonna get it". He knows he's gonna screw them so that's why he won't agree to a new resolution.
could just be spite, becuase the new resolution came from the US
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-2031958,00.html
- Sep 29, 2000
- 70,150
- 5
- 0
Personally I hope they nail his fuggin ass to the wall. Over a dozen resolutions broken. This really is a proving time for the UN and I don't want to see the US get to the point where they have no more respect for the UN - which they are approaching (and rightfully given the circumstances). The UN should make a new resolution and if Iraq doesn't care to abide by it they should enforce based upon his breaking of all of the other ones. It doesn't take a genius to know that he will break this current agreement (let inspectors back but no more new resolutions) since he's broken so many earlier ones. This time next year I'd like to see him dead or behind bars.
Kerouactivist
Diamond Member
- Jul 12, 2001
- 4,665
- 0
- 76
All Iraqi assets held by Saddam are held illegally.
Therefore, the United States has a legitimate legal right to seize them.
Therefore, the United States has a legitimate legal right to seize them.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
News NVIDIA and Intel to Develop AI Infrastructure and Personal Computing Products- Started by poke01
- Replies: 411
Facebook
Twitter