azazyel
Diamond Member
Now I'm not going to go on a long diatribe about Iran I just wanted to list some things/articles that I have found both interesting and surprising. I started paying close attention to Iran about 3 years ago when I read Pat Buchanan's book "Where the Right Went Wrong." I know most people think he's crazy but I'd say that at least 90% of his predictions have come to pass regarding the War in Iraq and what's leading up to a conflict with Iran.
Here's an article he wrote in 8/05.
http://www.theamericancause.org/a-pjb-050815-iran.htm
I then came across a great article from the Smithsonian called, "A New Day in Iran" which painted a picture of Iran that I hadn't expected. They actually seem to like the US. It really made clear the divide between the government and the people/youth of Iran.
http://www.smithsonianmagazine...es/2005/march/iran.php
I know a lot of people automatically just pass off Iran as just another terrorist hot of Muslim activity but is that really the truth. Does this seem like the Muslim behavior you heard about?
http://www.time.com/time/magaz...0,9171,1069077,00.html
Or how about:
I recently came across this article as well, which gave me a chuckle. Reading about women who will put bandages on their noses just so other people will think they?ve had a nose job.
http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/...e_id=1770&in_a_source=
It also put some perspective on what Iran is actually capable of doing.
Some other good articles:
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap...EN-US-Iran-Nuclear.php
Four Iranians inside Iran respond to questions about their country's nuclear programme - and their president's handling of international concern surrounding it.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/talking_point/6377021.stm
Here's an article he wrote in 8/05.
http://www.theamericancause.org/a-pjb-050815-iran.htm
Why, then, this talk of confrontation and pre-emptive strikes? Even if Iran had a weapon, to give it to a terrorist or to use it on a U.S. target would be an act of suicidal insanity by a regime that, no matter how militant, has shown no desire for war with America.
What is the worry? Just this. If or when Iran goes nuclear, she has a deterrent to intimidation. U.S. freedom of action in the Persian Gulf comes to an end. We would have to behave as gingerly with the mullahs as we do with Kim Jong Il, something intolerable to our neoconservatives and President Bush.
For the Israelis, an Iranian bomb would have the same impact as Stalin's explosion of a bomb had on us in 1949. Israel's invulnerability would come to an end. She would enter the world of Mutual Assured Destruction, like the one we had to live in during the Cold War. Thus, for Israel, the sooner the Americans pulverize Iran's infant nuclear facilities, the better. But herein lies the problem for President Bush.
I then came across a great article from the Smithsonian called, "A New Day in Iran" which painted a picture of Iran that I hadn't expected. They actually seem to like the US. It really made clear the divide between the government and the people/youth of Iran.
http://www.smithsonianmagazine...es/2005/march/iran.php
It?s increasingly apparent that Iran?s young are tuning out a preachy government for an alternative world of personal Web logs (Persian is the third most commonly used language on the Internet, after English and Chinese), private parties, movies, study, and dreams of emigrating to the West. These disenchanted ?children of the revolution? make up the bulk of Iran?s population, 70 percent of which is under 30. Too young to remember the anti-American sentiment of the ?70s, they share little of their parents? ideology. While young Iranians of an earlier generation once revered Che Guevara and romanticized guerrilla movements, students on today?s college campuses tend to shun politics and embrace practical goals such as getting a job or admission into a foreign graduate school. Some 150,000 Iranian professionals leave the country each year?one of the highest rates of brain drain in the Middle East. Meanwhile, Iranian intellectuals are quietly rediscovering American authors and embracing values familiar to any American civics student?separation of church and state, an independent judiciary and a strong presidency.
I know a lot of people automatically just pass off Iran as just another terrorist hot of Muslim activity but is that really the truth. Does this seem like the Muslim behavior you heard about?
http://www.time.com/time/magaz...0,9171,1069077,00.html
On my first night back in Tehran, I met some friends for drinks. It was a hazy night, and we convened at an intersection of a major expressway. I assumed we would head to someone's house, but my friends had something else in mind. In four cars, we took off down the highway, going 60 miles an hour, swerving to get close enough so I could pass a cocktail made of whiskey with mulberry nectar out the passenger-side window of our Korean hatchback to a friend in one of the other cars. Our stereo screeched Shaggy's Hey Sexy Lady; theirs, insipid Lebanese pop. Tehran, with its murals of suicide bombers, Versace billboards and rickety buses adorned with portraits of Shi'ite saints, slid by in a smoggy blur. We careered past police, who didn't blink. The driver of my car frowned as I flung out my arm to grab another drink. "You can't do this properly," she said, "if you keep closing your eyes."
Or how about:
In other words, the booze is harder to get, but once you have it, the freedom to imbibe, without limit or shame, is greater in Iran than anywhere else on earth. Isfahan, Iran, remains the only city outside the United States where I have found myself blind-drunk at ten in the morning. There is no such thing as non-alcoholic beer in Iran. Forget AA. In Russia, one constantly hears public figures bemoaning the permanent inebriation of the populace. In Iran, no one bemoans it, because anyone disagreeable enough to care is also too much of an ass to get invited for a drink. When you twist open a bottle of whiskey, you aim to drink it, and your drinking partners are automatically winnowed down to a handful of guiltless and joyful topers.
Russian drinking friends are so easy to find that the friendships feel false; everyone with a pulse will happily share a bottle of vodka with you. But in Iran you can?t drink without being put squarely in the confidence of your drinking mates. Nothing accelerates bonhomie better than the knowledge that your drinking partner could, at a whim, turn you in and have you subjected to the lash. I drank with families (gin, straight out of a can) and with store owners (Turkish beers). And on one lovely afternoon, university students in possession of a magnum of moonshine escorted me all the way up a long, steep trail so I could enjoy the view from a mountainside overlooking Tehran, all of us as tipsy as lords.
I recently came across this article as well, which gave me a chuckle. Reading about women who will put bandages on their noses just so other people will think they?ve had a nose job.
http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/...e_id=1770&in_a_source=
It also put some perspective on what Iran is actually capable of doing.
Well, not quite. The people of Iran are probably the most pro-Western in the world, though that will not stop them fighting like hell if we are foolish enough to attack them. Not that they will do so with nuclear weapons any time soon. Iran is rather bad at grand projects. Its sole nuclear power station has never produced a watt of electricity in more than three decades, the capital's TV tower is unfinished after 20 years of work and Tehran's airport took 30 years to build.
Some other good articles:
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap...EN-US-Iran-Nuclear.php
Former chief U.N. weapons inspector Hans Blix said Monday the United States, Europe and the U.N. Security Council are "humiliating" Iran by demanding that it suspend uranium enrichment before any negotiations and then dictating its rewards.
He said the package of economic and political incentives put forward in June 2006 by the U.S. and key European countries, which was later endorsed by the council, did not mention the key issue of security guarantees for Iran or adequately address the possibility of U.S. diplomatic recognition if Tehran renounces enrichment.
Four Iranians inside Iran respond to questions about their country's nuclear programme - and their president's handling of international concern surrounding it.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/talking_point/6377021.stm