• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Iran warns Israel; NK to test missiles

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: onelove
Your statement that we could
We could take out any one country in the world - China and NK included - if we really threw everything we had at them
is ludicrous - you forgot to include: "if we don't care what else happens to the planet much less own country"
By 'everything we have' I wasn't intending to include WMD. The conventional firepower we are capable of bringing to the table could make "Shock and Awe' look like a tea party. I'm well aware of these capabilities, which is why I said we could invade NK if necessary. Thus, "We may have felt safe enough to attack Iraq, but there is no good military option regarding NK. With respect, if you did any reading on this subject you would know that." is true, though I never said invading NK was a good military option. I just said that we could do it 'successfully', and that someone else could better tell you the politics and downfalls of an invasion.

You'll note that I've said multiple times in this thread that I don't think there IS a good solution to NK or Iran, military or otherwise.
 
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
You'll note that I've said multiple times in this thread that I don't think there IS a good solution to NK or Iran, military or otherwise.

Particularly with regard to NK, I agree.
 
Back
Top