Iran at it again

[alchemize]

Iran hints at pre-emption over threat from U.S.


Standard extremist liberal response: "The US did it, why shouldn't they?"
My reponse: Sure, they've got every right to. And suffer the consequences.

edit: added extremist for some of the more sound-minded liberals

 

[TuxDave]

I'm a liberal, and all I have to say is "Mutual Destruction" if they even try. Well... complete destruction on their half, that's guaranteed.

Edit: lol... nice edit from liberal to 'extreme liberal'

 

[NJDevil]

Thank god we have Israel ready to blow up that nuclear reactor the moment the Russians give them the last piece they need to enrich Uranium.

Honestly, what would we do w/o those guys?

 

[Aimster]

10,000 U.S servicemen dead 2005.
100,000 Iranian Soldiers killed
100,000 Iranian civilians killed
10,000 Iraqi Killed
5,000 Israeli Killed
5,000 Afghanistans killed.

2006:
5 armed babies are born all over the middle east.

 

[sandorski]

Originally posted by: alchemize
Iran hints at pre-emption over threat from U.S.


Standard extremist liberal response: "The US did it, why shouldn't they?"
My reponse: Sure, they've got every right to. And suffer the consequences.

edit: added extremist for some of the more sound-minded liberals

It is not "extremist" in the least. Many warned about this very thing. Now that Pandoras Box has been opened, who knows what the consequences will be?

 

[jackschmittusa]

Way back when Bush first brought up preemptive war I mentioned that others would use the same policy. And I said that we wouldn't like it when they did. Bush is old enough to understand human nature and should have forseen the can of worms he has opened up.

 

[Klixxer]

Let them threaten, they know if they take action they will be mangled, it is more of a terror balance, they are basically saying "we won't be next" and i can't really blame then since the US is kinda attacking whatever country they like based on false evidence.

If you were in the axis of evil you would do the same thing, get your WMD's while they are hot, if not needed before they sure as hell are now.

 

[GoPackGo]

Originally posted by: sandorski

Originally posted by: alchemize
Iran hints at pre-emption over threat from U.S.


Standard extremist liberal response: "The US did it, why shouldn't they?"
My reponse: Sure, they've got every right to. And suffer the consequences.

edit: added extremist for some of the more sound-minded liberals

It is not "extremist" in the least. Many warned about this very thing. Now that Pandoras Box has been opened, who knows what the consequences will be?

Good thing we have B52s and Los Angeles Class Submarines...I am sure Boeing also has the Tomahawk supply up to snuf again.

 

[Klixxer]

Originally posted by: jackschmittusa
Way back when Bush first brought up preemptive war I mentioned that others would use the same policy. And I said that we wouldn't like it when they did. Bush is old enough to understand human nature and should have forseen the can of worms he has opened up.

Agreed, a moron with power made a dangerous precedent.

It was a mistake in every way, angle or hitch anyone can ever think up.

 

[Zephyr106]

Originally posted by: GoPackGo

Originally posted by: sandorski

Originally posted by: alchemize
Iran hints at pre-emption over threat from U.S.


Standard extremist liberal response: "The US did it, why shouldn't they?"
My reponse: Sure, they've got every right to. And suffer the consequences.

edit: added extremist for some of the more sound-minded liberals

It is not "extremist" in the least. Many warned about this very thing. Now that Pandoras Box has been opened, who knows what the consequences will be?

Good thing we have B52s and Los Angeles Class Submarines...I am sure Boeing also has the Tomahawk supply up to snuf again.

And we can only hope and pray that world events allow our defense industry to work at a heightened state perpetually! Violence abroad is good for the American economy and psyche.

Zephyr

 

[CanOWorms]

Can't blame them. Hopefully our missile defense capabilties will continue to improve.

 

[Klixxer]

Originally posted by: GoPackGo

Originally posted by: sandorski

Originally posted by: alchemize
Iran hints at pre-emption over threat from U.S.


Standard extremist liberal response: "The US did it, why shouldn't they?"
My reponse: Sure, they've got every right to. And suffer the consequences.

edit: added extremist for some of the more sound-minded liberals

It is not "extremist" in the least. Many warned about this very thing. Now that Pandoras Box has been opened, who knows what the consequences will be?

Good thing we have B52s and Los Angeles Class Submarines...I am sure Boeing also has the Tomahawk supply up to snuf again.

Yeah, bomb the sh!t out of those... those... INFIDELS!

Terrorists? the US? ookeidoookei..

Honestly, you guys are nuts, and i mean that as a sincere insult.

 

[RabidMongoose]

Well if they want to be destroyed then they should try to do a pre-emptive strike. They will do whatever is in their nation's best interests. Somehow I don't think an attack against the US is going to be very good for them.

 

[Klixxer]

Originally posted by: Zephyr106

Originally posted by: GoPackGo

Originally posted by: sandorski

Originally posted by: alchemize
Iran hints at pre-emption over threat from U.S.


Standard extremist liberal response: "The US did it, why shouldn't they?"
My reponse: Sure, they've got every right to. And suffer the consequences.

edit: added extremist for some of the more sound-minded liberals

It is not "extremist" in the least. Many warned about this very thing. Now that Pandoras Box has been opened, who knows what the consequences will be?

Good thing we have B52s and Los Angeles Class Submarines...I am sure Boeing also has the Tomahawk supply up to snuf again.

And we can only hope and pray that world events allow our defense industry to work at a heightened state perpetually! Violence abroad is good for the American economy and psyche.

Zephyr

I would say it will take the US a couple of more years to become an empire and five years more to be defeated from within.

After that neither you nor i will exist, and good riddance to all of us, we were to stupid to live anywayz.

 

[RabidMongoose]

Originally posted by: Klixxer

Originally posted by: Zephyr106

Originally posted by: GoPackGo

Originally posted by: sandorski

Originally posted by: alchemize
Iran hints at pre-emption over threat from U.S.


Standard extremist liberal response: "The US did it, why shouldn't they?"
My reponse: Sure, they've got every right to. And suffer the consequences.

edit: added extremist for some of the more sound-minded liberals

It is not "extremist" in the least. Many warned about this very thing. Now that Pandoras Box has been opened, who knows what the consequences will be?

Good thing we have B52s and Los Angeles Class Submarines...I am sure Boeing also has the Tomahawk supply up to snuf again.

And we can only hope and pray that world events allow our defense industry to work at a heightened state perpetually! Violence abroad is good for the American economy and psyche.

Zephyr

I would say it will take the US a couple of more years to become an empire and five years more to be defeated from within.

After that neither you nor i will exist, and good riddance to all of us, we were to stupid to live anywayz.

I don't know...I think Europeans may try to enslave the rest of the world again before your scenario happens.

 

[Klixxer]

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
Well if they want to be destroyed then they should try to do a pre-emptive strike. They will do whatever is in their nation's best interests. Somehow I don't think an attack against the US is going to be very good for them.

Since the US seems to attack nations at random, it is understandable, if Bush gets four more years, what are toe odds for not invading Iran, i will bet against it.

A full fledged nuclear attack will meke them go down with a boom unlike the nation who had stockpiles of wmd's and for some strange reason never used them.

I know you are a wannabee American, but fvcking please, you have to unerstand their POV.

 

[Klixxer]

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose

Originally posted by: Klixxer

Originally posted by: Zephyr106

Originally posted by: GoPackGo

Originally posted by: sandorski

Originally posted by: alchemize
Iran hints at pre-emption over threat from U.S.


Standard extremist liberal response: "The US did it, why shouldn't they?"
My reponse: Sure, they've got every right to. And suffer the consequences.

edit: added extremist for some of the more sound-minded liberals

It is not "extremist" in the least. Many warned about this very thing. Now that Pandoras Box has been opened, who knows what the consequences will be?

Good thing we have B52s and Los Angeles Class Submarines...I am sure Boeing also has the Tomahawk supply up to snuf again.

And we can only hope and pray that world events allow our defense industry to work at a heightened state perpetually! Violence abroad is good for the American economy and psyche.

Zephyr

I would say it will take the US a couple of more years to become an empire and five years more to be defeated from within.

After that neither you nor i will exist, and good riddance to all of us, we were to stupid to live anywayz.

I don't know...I think Europeans may try to enslave the rest of the world again before your scenario happens.

Erm, we are NOT the ones who make up evidence, present them to people we assume are entirely daft and are laughed out of the room and then invade a soverign nation based on BS.

I somehow think that the US will, if this madman persists invade pretty much the rest of the middle east.

Get your facts straight wannabee.

 

[RabidMongoose]

Originally posted by: Klixxer

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
Well if they want to be destroyed then they should try to do a pre-emptive strike. They will do whatever is in their nation's best interests. Somehow I don't think an attack against the US is going to be very good for them.

Since the US seems to attack nations at random, it is understandable, if Bush gets four more years, what are toe odds for not invading Iran, i will bet against it.

A full fledged nuclear attack will meke them go down with a boom unlike the nation who had stockpiles of wmd's and for some strange reason never used them.

I know you are a wannabee American, but fvcking please, you have to unerstand their POV.

I don't think that the war against Iraq was random at all. It was for money and power, just like some of the opposition.

I do understand their view. They should do whatever is in their country's best interests and that would be to develop a nuclear weapon as a weapon to prevent war against them instead of using that weapon in a single shot and then get destroyed. I'm willing to bet that they would rather live than die.

 

[CanOWorms]

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose

Originally posted by: Klixxer

Originally posted by: Zephyr106

Originally posted by: GoPackGo

Originally posted by: sandorski

Originally posted by: alchemize
Iran hints at pre-emption over threat from U.S.


Standard extremist liberal response: "The US did it, why shouldn't they?"
My reponse: Sure, they've got every right to. And suffer the consequences.

edit: added extremist for some of the more sound-minded liberals

It is not "extremist" in the least. Many warned about this very thing. Now that Pandoras Box has been opened, who knows what the consequences will be?

Good thing we have B52s and Los Angeles Class Submarines...I am sure Boeing also has the Tomahawk supply up to snuf again.

And we can only hope and pray that world events allow our defense industry to work at a heightened state perpetually! Violence abroad is good for the American economy and psyche.

Zephyr

I would say it will take the US a couple of more years to become an empire and five years more to be defeated from within.

After that neither you nor i will exist, and good riddance to all of us, we were to stupid to live anywayz.

I don't know...I think Europeans may try to enslave the rest of the world again before your scenario happens.

My scenario is this: European poplation is declining at an alarming rate. Without immigration, their economies will collapse, but they don't want to bring in too many immigrants because of mass-scale xenophobia and discrimination. Eventually, the population will reach a high percentage of "foreign" influence and people will be alarmed and start pushing for the building of concentration camps and genocide of these undesirables. This will cause most of the other countries to unite against Europe and fight WW3 there.

Boom, end of the world.

 

[RabidMongoose]

Originally posted by: Klixxer
Erm, we are NOT the ones who make up evidence, present them to people we assume are entirely daft and are laughed out of the room and then invade a soverign nation based on BS.

I somehow think that the US will, if this madman persists invade pretty much the rest of the middle east.

Get your facts straight wannabee.

Did the US make up evidence? Do you have proof of this?

If there is any gain in invading Iran then I suppose that Bush would invade it if he were to be re-elected. It isn't out of the realm of possibility.

However, your scenario of the US becoming a colonial of imperial power and apparently annihilating the world is probably less likely than the chances of Europe trying to subjugate the entire world again as they have the experience. Not very likely either but just my opinion.

 

[Klixxer]

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose

Originally posted by: Klixxer

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
Well if they want to be destroyed then they should try to do a pre-emptive strike. They will do whatever is in their nation's best interests. Somehow I don't think an attack against the US is going to be very good for them.

Since the US seems to attack nations at random, it is understandable, if Bush gets four more years, what are toe odds for not invading Iran, i will bet against it.

A full fledged nuclear attack will meke them go down with a boom unlike the nation who had stockpiles of wmd's and for some strange reason never used them.

I know you are a wannabee American, but fvcking please, you have to unerstand their POV.

I don't think that the war against Iraq was random at all. It was for money and power, just like some of the opposition.

I do understand their view. They should do whatever is in their country's best interests and that would be to develop a nuclear weapon as a weapon to prevent war against them instead of using that weapon in a single shot and then get destroyed. I'm willing to bet that they would rather live than die.

Considering the situations i have been in, and even my current situation, i will take that bet.

 

[Klixxer]

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose

Originally posted by: Klixxer
Erm, we are NOT the ones who make up evidence, present them to people we assume are entirely daft and are laughed out of the room and then invade a soverign nation based on BS.

I somehow think that the US will, if this madman persists invade pretty much the rest of the middle east.

Get your facts straight wannabee.

Did the US make up evidence? Do you have proof of this?

If there is any gain in invading Iran then I suppose that Bush would invade it if he were to be re-elected. It isn't out of the realm of possibility.

However, your scenario of the US becoming a colonial of imperial power and apparently annihilating the world is probably less likely than the chances of Europe trying to subjugate the entire world again as they have the experience. Not very likely either but just my opinion.

Ahem, they knew not that there were vast stockpilse, they knew where they WERE too, i call that making up evidence that clearly did not exist (it didn't).

The US has already started so your point is moot.

Yeah, Europe has the experience, but where did the people who killed the REAL Americans come from? I believe that was a point you made in another thread, so if anything, those eurpeans currently living in the US have perfected it.

 

[RabidMongoose]

Originally posted by: Klixxer
Ahem, they knew not that there were vast stockpilse, they knew where they WERE too, i call that making up evidence that clearly did not exist (it didn't).

The US has already started so your point is moot.

Do you have evidence of these lies? Sorry, but I don't keep as up to date on all of this Iraq war stuff. I thought they had 'bad' evidence. Please back up your statement with a source.

Yeah, Europe has the experience, but where did the people who killed the REAL Americans come from? I believe that was a point you made in another thread, so if anything, those eurpeans currently living in the US have perfected it.

Ummm...90% or so of the 'REAL' Americans (if you're talking about natives of the Americas) were killed by Europeans, especially by bringing their diseases to these lands. Do you know anything about what certain European powers did in the Americas? No offense, but you seem to be lacking the history in this area. Anyone with a rudimentary history course in this section would know about European history in the 'New World'. I've noticed that many Europeans don't really know much about their colonial times as well as involvement in the slave trade. I suggest you read up on these.

 

[Klixxer]

Originally posted by: RabidMongoose

Originally posted by: Klixxer
Ahem, they knew not that there were vast stockpilse, they knew where they WERE too, i call that making up evidence that clearly did not exist (it didn't).

The US has already started so your point is moot.

Do you have evidence of these lies? Sorry, but I don't keep as up to date on all of this Iraq war stuff. I thought they had 'bad' evidence. Please back up your statement with a source.

Yeah, Europe has the experience, but where did the people who killed the REAL Americans come from? I believe that was a point you made in another thread, so if anything, those eurpeans currently living in the US have perfected it.

Ummm...90% or so of the 'REAL' Americans (if you're talking about natives of the Americas) were killed by Europeans, especially by bringing their diseases to these lands. Do you know anything about what certain European powers did in the Americas? No offense, but you seem to be lacking the history in this area. Anyone with a rudimentary history course in this section would know about European history in the 'New World'. I've noticed that many Europeans don't really know much about their colonial times as well as involvement in the slave trade. I suggest you read up on these.

1. search, i thas been repeated so many times i doubt you have missed it.

2. you proved my point, thank you.

 

[RabidMongoose]

1. Please provide a direct link to a legitimate source. Sorry, but I think that if there was indisputable proof that this current administration outright lied, then there would be even more news about it and there would be almost no election in November for Bush. I haven't seen anything about outright lying yet. However, I haven't read up much about it.

2. You're welcome, but a significant portion of the US population are not originally from Europe and most hold no ties to it at all.