I've administered hundreds of the things, so I have at least a passing familiarity with them: I wouldn't say the "real" ones take hours, but you're correct in that online tests may not give you an accurate idea of your IQ, at least as would be measured by a traditional IQ test.
As for the question regarding the accuracy of IQ tests in measuring intelligence: it depends on how you're defining intelligence. Plenty of highly successful individuals score in the average or above average (rather than, say, superior) range on IQ tests, in part because, as has been said, there are plenty of things that IQ tests don't measure, with memory and drive/motivation being two of those constructs.
Hello. Could you please address the queries in my OP (all of them preferably and a little bit in detail if that's possible) and in post #22 ?
Also, can one not train to score well on an IQ test by repetitively doing questions on pattern recognition, symbol processing and everything else that IQ tests cover? So how good are they at measuring "innate intelligence" and potential? I'm not asserting anything. I'm merely inquiring as I do not know enough and I've never really taken an IQ test.
Last edited:
