IPOD NANO

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,625
10,326
136
How is this NOT a good value?? Name ONE 2GB flash player that is cheaper and just as small, svelte, with comparable battery life. Even if you can find one, IT WON'T HAVE A COLOR SCREEN!

I would LOVE a black 2GB unit (I have a 20GB already for more capacity). The black unit would go well with a black RAZR.
 

ThisIsMatt

Banned
Aug 4, 2000
11,820
1
0
Originally posted by: UNCjigga
How is this NOT a good value?? Name ONE 2GB flash player that is cheaper and just as small, svelte, with comparable battery life. Even if you can find one, IT WON'T HAVE A COLOR SCREEN!

I would LOVE a black 2GB unit (I have a 20GB already for more capacity). The black unit would go well with a black RAZR.
Are you talking to me? I'm just commenting on the sheeple consumerism. Nothing is ever good enough, cool enough, impressive enough for the kiddies. You're so unique, just like everyone else. I'm not saying it doesn't look nice, it does, but last time I checked I didn't need a color screen to play music, my player gets the same battery life off of a single AAA (which I can change at any time for almost zero downtime), and it's smaller (although only 1gb is available).
 

PurdueRy

Lifer
Nov 12, 2004
13,837
4
0
Originally posted by: ThisIsMatt
Originally posted by: UNCjigga
How is this NOT a good value?? Name ONE 2GB flash player that is cheaper and just as small, svelte, with comparable battery life. Even if you can find one, IT WON'T HAVE A COLOR SCREEN!

I would LOVE a black 2GB unit (I have a 20GB already for more capacity). The black unit would go well with a black RAZR.
Are you talking to me? I'm just commenting on the sheeple consumerism. Nothing is ever good enough, cool enough, impressive enough for the kiddies. You're so unique, just like everyone else. I'm not saying it doesn't look nice, it does, but last time I checked I didn't need a color screen to play music, my player gets the same battery life off of a single AAA (which I can change at any time for almost zero downtime), and it's smaller (although only 1gb is available).


Just curious...what player do you have?
 

ColdFusion718

Diamond Member
Mar 4, 2000
3,496
9
81
Just wondering, does the black Ipod Nano come with white or black headphones? I haven't seen anyone mention this, if anyone has this model, let us know. Thanks!
 

tweakmm

Lifer
May 28, 2001
18,436
4
0
Originally posted by: mchammer
I wonder if they will lose female sales, because I always see girls with the mini's and I never see guys with them.
It's probably because they only come in wack colors.
 

Mr N8

Diamond Member
Dec 3, 2001
8,793
0
76
I'll wait until they get the 6gb and 8gb cards into them. I would expect they will be ready by the end of the year or early next year.
 

EyeMWing

Banned
Jun 13, 2003
15,670
1
0
I'm still waiting for one in black that doesn't cost $11ty.

Edit: Wait, this IS available in black. Not bad. Not bad at all. Too bad I'm too poor. And 4gb would get me nowhere.
 

toekramp

Diamond Member
Jun 30, 2001
8,426
2
0
Originally posted by: ColdFusion718
Just wondering, does the black Ipod Nano come with white or black headphones? I haven't seen anyone mention this, if anyone has this model, let us know. Thanks!

friend got his black nano, comes with white headphones
 

andy9o

Senior member
May 27, 2005
494
2
0
Originally posted by: mdchesne
apple is once again, ahead of the pack by at least a year

but only in the world of mp3 players. I give apple its due, but I wish they would stop making computers. Just sell the d@mn OS!
 

upsciLLion

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2001
5,947
1
81
Originally posted by: andy9o
Originally posted by: mdchesne
apple is once again, ahead of the pack by at least a year

but only in the world of mp3 players. I give apple its due, but I wish they would stop making computers. Just sell the d@mn OS!

I doubt OSX would be nearly as well if it had to run on as many different pieces of hardware (and combinations thereof) as Windows does.
 

andy9o

Senior member
May 27, 2005
494
2
0
Originally posted by: upsciLLion
Originally posted by: andy9o
Originally posted by: mdchesne
apple is once again, ahead of the pack by at least a year

but only in the world of mp3 players. I give apple its due, but I wish they would stop making computers. Just sell the d@mn OS!

I doubt OSX would be nearly as well if it had to run on as many different pieces of hardware (and combinations thereof) as Windows does.


Why not? They're porting it to x86 anyways, and it's up to the 3 party companies (nvidia) etc.. to release drivers for the chipsets/VGAs/etc.... so, If it can't run as well when it's opened up a bit, maybe it was never a very good piece of software to begin with?
 

Excelsior

Lifer
May 30, 2002
19,047
18
81
Originally posted by: andy9o
Originally posted by: upsciLLion
Originally posted by: andy9o
Originally posted by: mdchesne
apple is once again, ahead of the pack by at least a year

but only in the world of mp3 players. I give apple its due, but I wish they would stop making computers. Just sell the d@mn OS!

I doubt OSX would be nearly as well if it had to run on as many different pieces of hardware (and combinations thereof) as Windows does.


Why not? They're porting it to x86 anyways, and it's up to the 3 party companies (nvidia) etc.. to release drivers for the chipsets/VGAs/etc.... so, If it can't run as well when it's opened up a bit, maybe it was never a very good piece of software to begin with?

Rather..it is already ported, and has been for a long time, just not released for the masses.
 

upsciLLion

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2001
5,947
1
81
Originally posted by: andy9o
Originally posted by: upsciLLion
Originally posted by: andy9o
Originally posted by: mdchesne
apple is once again, ahead of the pack by at least a year

but only in the world of mp3 players. I give apple its due, but I wish they would stop making computers. Just sell the d@mn OS!

I doubt OSX would be nearly as well if it had to run on as many different pieces of hardware (and combinations thereof) as Windows does.


Why not? They're porting it to x86 anyways, and it's up to the 3 party companies (nvidia) etc.. to release drivers for the chipsets/VGAs/etc.... so, If it can't run as well when it's opened up a bit, maybe it was never a very good piece of software to begin with?

OSX is an excellent OS because of how it works not what it works with.
 

mchammer187

Diamond Member
Nov 26, 2000
9,114
0
76
Originally posted by: Gl4di4tor
My mp3 collection has reached 100 gigs, 4 gigs is not gonna do it.

i hope that is uncompressed (because MP3 implies it is not) because I see no point in carrying 100GB of music with you

assuming 192 Kb/s VBR that is just under 50 days of music

i only have about 6-7 GB in MP3s and would want some more but i dont see how it can ever get to that much nor even want that much especially on a portable

can you honestly say you "like" every song in your collection

even at 8 GBs about half the songs I have I dont even like but just there because I ripped the entire CD