blckgrffn
Diamond Member
Wrong. IPC is one of the best performance barometers for a CPU out there. As the P4 and BullDozer have proven mhz don't mean jack unless you're comparing apples to apples.
?
I think are both saying the same thing in different ways?
I mean, a 3.0C P4 stuck in there handily with single core A64's, did it not? Despite its "lack of" IPC?
If somehow a 4Ghz BD core and a ~2.6Ghz SB core used the same amount of juice we'd like be in just about the same position. Unfortunately for AMD, that is not even close to reality.
IPC is certainly important but is not the final word in CPU performance... if you got to carried away with IPC you wouldn't have the clock cycles to handle cache misses, etc. very gracefully. There has to be a balance...
If not, why wouldn't we just increase IPC and forgo clock speed increases?
