I believe CR's original main issue with this air purifier (funny that you call it "air freshener") is that it was ineffective comapred to traditional air purifier (I have and recommend the whirlpool air purifiers). The Ionic Breeze got poor ratings in all their air cleaning performance tests. It only got a good rating for noise.......
Subsequently Sharper Image sued Consumer's Union (parent of CR) claiming huge damages due to product disparagement, but they just withdrew their lawsuit. Here's the news clip for all you fanboys:
Sharper Image pays $525,000 to end lawsuit against CU
Sharper Image Corp. has ended a product-disparagement lawsuit that it brought against Consumers Union, publisher of Consumer Reports, paying CU court-ordered attorneys? fees and costs totaling $525,000.
Sharper Image sued after Consumer Reports judged the company?s Ionic Breeze Quadra air cleaner ?ineffective? in an October 2003 report. A U.S. District Court dismissed the suit, ruling that Sharper Image had not shown our findings to be false. Because Sharper Image?s claims affected CR?s rights of free speech and press, the court ordered the company to pay our legal expenses. Sharper Image filed an appeal but later withdrew it, ending the legal action.
?Sharper Image?s decision to withdraw its appeal puts an end to a lawsuit that should never have been filed, over reviews that were truthful, carefully researched, and fairly stated,? said Jim Guest, president of Consumers Union. ?This is a victory for every American concerned about the rights of an unbiased organization to test products independently, and to speak out in the interest of product performance and quality.?
). Too bad that that deal has expired; I've always wanted to try this kind of filter but at SI's prices it is just too high; although, I did get a combo ionic filter/HEPA filter fan unit at Wal Mart for not-too- much (don't remember off hand how much), and it seems to work rather well.
Facebook
Twitter