• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

investment options

MrDudeMan

Lifer
I'm thinking about changing up my investment strategy because I want to work less. In a nutshell, I'd like to get a little bit more aggressive.

I don't plan to touch the stable, long term accounts, e.g. 401k. I have a pool of money I use for shorter term investments that, lately, has been collecting dust in a worthless savings account. I've been busy moving and getting new work, which forced me to put this on the back burner. Things have settled down now, though.

I own real estate already and I'm fine with leaving those properties as they currently are, but I don't want to buy anything else right now. I know what I'm comfortable doing in terms of investments, but I'm looking for unbiased opinions about how to invest between 100 and 200k. The whole 200k is available, but I am willing to break it up into multiple investments depending on the situation.

Guidelines:
1) The pool of money isn't the nest egg.
2) High risk isn't necessarily off of the table.
3) It would be nice to be able to have liquid access to the gains on a yearly basis. In other words, it would be nice to use this money as a way to generate additional yearly cash flow instead of simply reinvesting into the principal. I have other accounts already setup for that.
4) I'm not close to retirement age (29).

What would you do with it?
 
Well, picking individual stocks for high growth is higher risk\reward but takes a lot of time and seems much tougher now. 2008 -2012 made it pretty easy with sales everywhere but with DJIA hitting record highs and me being busier I can't find anything really good (Intel below $20, ARMH below $23, Google below $200). So my money sits in Stock index funds which should still return very well over the long term. You could park the money in some dividend stocks\funds for income generation but I don't have any experience with that. Why do you want income generation?
 
Last edited:
Trying to time the market is what the biggest bunch of dumbasses do. You will be made an example of time and time again.

Want investment options?
1) Invest further in Index funds
2) Invest in a few companies that you think have a future and HOLD.
3) Invest in property for rental, preferably property that is likely to move up in value while also give good rental returns.
4) Invest in yourself. Not exactly the highest returns, but likely the funnest and most rewarding 😛 You can put out a nice backyard, put in some hardwood flooring, etc.. etc.. You're not going to get the best returns monetarily, but happiness is another type of return.
5) Planning on kids? You better plan on paying for their college funds because the state sure isn't going to give them any loans with how much you make. Start looking into how you will save/invest now.

OP, you're 29. Are you married? What is your retirement assets looking like?
 
Trying to time the market is what the biggest bunch of dumbasses do. You will be made an example of time and time again.

I didn't mean to imply that I was trying to do this if I did.

Want investment options?
1) Invest further in Index funds
2) Invest in a few companies that you think have a future and HOLD.
3) Invest in property for rental, preferably property that is likely to move up in value while also give good rental returns.
4) Invest in yourself. Not exactly the highest returns, but likely the funnest and most rewarding 😛 You can put out a nice backyard, put in some hardwood flooring, etc.. etc.. You're not going to get the best returns monetarily, but happiness is another type of return.
5) Planning on kids? You better plan on paying for their college funds because the state sure isn't going to give them any loans with how much you make. Start looking into how you will save/invest now.

1) I have some money in the S&P 500, but maybe I could spread out over other index funds as well. I don't know a lot about this, but it's worth looking into.

2) I was considering this, but I also have no experience here and I feel like it's pretty risky without doing some homework. I'm willing to put in the effort, though.

3) I have multiple rental properties already and I'm looking to diversify. I can always come back to this if other options don't feel very attractive.

4) This is a good point. I'm considering hiring someone to run my business so I can go back to school to learn French. I want to buy a small house in rural France sometime in the next three years and I'm only conversationally fluent. I'd like to take the time to become completely fluent before that happens.

5) I already have two and their college educations are as funded as I want them to be. I had to pay for a lot of my education and it made me much more aware of the costs and benefits of college with respect to long term financial success. I put 50k for each kid in a trust that will disburse funds to them per the guidelines I setup. The trust invested the money in a low risk mutual fund that has been earning 3-5%.

OP, you're 29. Are you married? What is your retirement assets looking like?

Yes, I'm married. We bought a modest house that will be paid off in 8 years. I'm not a big fan of paying off low interest debt, but I also didn't want to drag it out which is why I got a 10 year loan. I max out my Roth IRA contributions every year and she does the same. I don't have access to a 401k anymore because I'm working for myself and I haven't messed with setting up a solo 401k, though maybe I should. Her company doesn't match so we haven't been using hers either. We have no debt other than the house.
 
I'd add more low expense ratio stock index mutual funds or ETFs, to buy and hold for years. Boring, but it wins over most active investing strategies.

Do you have any foreign stock index funds?
 
I'd add more low expense ratio stock index mutual funds or ETFs, to buy and hold for years. Boring, but it wins over most active investing strategies.

Do you have any foreign stock index funds?

I'm okay with boring as I don't feel particularly compelled to be actively involved.

I don't have any foreign stock index funds. Are there any you recommend? I know very little about other markets, but I suppose they probably aren't very different from the local flavors.
 
Yes, I'm married. We bought a modest house that will be paid off in 8 years. I'm not a big fan of paying off low interest debt, but I also didn't want to drag it out which is why I got a 10 year loan. I max out my Roth IRA contributions every year and she does the same. I don't have access to a 401k anymore because I'm working for myself and I haven't messed with setting up a solo 401k, though maybe I should. Her company doesn't match so we haven't been using hers either. We have no debt other than the house.

Monetarily speaking, if you are willing to say - how much do you have in retirement funds? I can't tell since aside from your ROTH IRA's, (which have a highly limited yearly max contribution of $5.5k) so it's hard to base. It's kinda not a surprise now that you have a decent amount of liquid cash for other items.

You sound like you have a good amount, but you don't have a 401k and only have IRA's. You need more diversification.

First and foremost, if your only retirement is based on ROTH IRA's, you are putting all your eggs in the "Tax paid" basket. You should have some in the tax deferred basket, hence diversification. This is usually covered with a traditional 401k. I would suggest putting at least some in your wife's 401k. Tax advantages are something companies cringe for year after year.

But what do I know... I just work in tax 😀
 
Monetarily speaking, if you are willing to say - how much do you have in retirement funds? I can't tell since aside from your ROTH IRA's, (which have a highly limited yearly max contribution of $5.5k) so it's hard to base. It's kinda not a surprise now that you have a decent amount of liquid cash for other items.

100k in my 401k and none in hers
IRAs are both at 25k and we'll continue to max these out every year
Total of 150k in retirement funds

You sound like you have a good amount, but you don't have a 401k and only have IRA's. You need more diversification.

I agree. I came here specifically to hear opinions about how to diversify because I know what I have right now isn't optimal, but I also don't know how to fix it. I went to a few investment firms to get opinions and they wanted outrageous fees to manage my account. I've done well enough on my own at this point, so I'll maintain the status quo for another few years to see how it goes.

First and foremost, if your only retirement is based on ROTH IRA's, you are putting all your eggs in the "Tax paid" basket. You should have some in the tax deferred basket, hence diversification. This is usually covered with a traditional 401k. I would suggest putting at least some in your wife's 401k. Tax advantages are something companies cringe for year after year.

Yeah, that's probably a good idea. I'll start moving some of her paycheck into her 401k. I prefer having access to the cash for various reasons, but I also understand that isn't ideal in terms of an investment strategy. Real estate was my initial investment vehicle.
 
I'm thinking about changing up my investment strategy because I want to work less. In a nutshell, I'd like to get a little bit more aggressive.

I don't plan to touch the stable, long term accounts, e.g. 401k. I have a pool of money I use for shorter term investments that, lately, has been collecting dust in a worthless savings account. I've been busy moving and getting new work, which forced me to put this on the back burner. Things have settled down now, though.

I own real estate already and I'm fine with leaving those properties as they currently are, but I don't want to buy anything else right now. I know what I'm comfortable doing in terms of investments, but I'm looking for unbiased opinions about how to invest between 100 and 200k. The whole 200k is available, but I am willing to break it up into multiple investments depending on the situation.

Guidelines:
1) The pool of money isn't the nest egg.
2) High risk isn't necessarily off of the table.
3) It would be nice to be able to have liquid access to the gains on a yearly basis. In other words, it would be nice to use this money as a way to generate additional yearly cash flow instead of simply reinvesting into the principal. I have other accounts already setup for that.
4) I'm not close to retirement age (29).

What would you do with it?


If you want to lose 200K, Ask ATOT for investment advice. You will get the best stock picks in town.

I hear COS is a hot one and cheap now, selling for a big discount. 🙂
 
FOREX!

But seriously, Vanguard is my favorite company for low expense mutual funds and ETFs. If you set up an account directly with them you can add fund shares without any trading fees.

Schwab also has some good low-expense funds if you already have a brokerage account there.

Vanguard - total international index, both developed and emerging markets (VGTSX)
>> "Also available as a lower-cost Admiral™ Shares mutual fund and an ETF."
https://personal.vanguard.com/us/FundsSnapshot?FundId=0113&FundIntExt=INT

The Vanguard Target funds (Target 2040, 45, ...) are an interesting choice since it is a fund of index funds, that shifts over time to include more bond fund shares. If I were getting shares of it I'd pick a year after I plan to retire (for example 2050 instead of 2040), to be more aggressive about staying in stocks.
 
I don't have access to a 401k anymore because I'm working for myself and I haven't messed with setting up a solo 401k, though maybe I should. Her company doesn't match so we haven't been using hers either. We have no debt other than the house.

I would look into doing this. You say you have between $100 and 200k to invest. I would maybe consider doing the following:
Max out a solo 401k and her 401k. Make up any salary deficit this causes out of the $100-200k. This reduces your tax liability for the years you are able to do this which can be significant if you are above or in the midst of any deduction cuts offs or phase outs.

Max out her Roth as well. Not only because any tax advantaged space >>>> taxable space but because Roth IRAs have a nice withdrawal option if you think there is a chance you would retire early
http://www.rothira.com/blog/what-is-rule-72t

I don't think your situation is anything fancy enough to pay an annual % to someone to manage. Take a look at the bogleheads link posted for some good ideas. You may also be able to find a fee-only adviser to help you come up with a plan. It could be just a one time fee for advice and help with setup and away you go

One of the biggest things you need to determine is how well you tolerate risk. And I don't mean 'I am taking risk because I think I should' but know your actual ability to watch money vanish from your accounts. If you can't stomach watching 50% of your balance vanish then you will want to have a less risky portfolio than 100% stocks.* Sure it might not return as much with a safer mix of bonds but it will return more than you panicking and selling at or near the bottom. Many people say they can tolerate risk but looking at how many fled the markets in 2008 and 09 show that a huge percentage were fooling themselves

*Opinions vary about the stock\bond mix by age so this was just an easy math example
 
Last edited:
100k in my 401k and none in hers
IRAs are both at 25k and we'll continue to max these out every year
Total of 150k in retirement funds.

Would you mind ballparking what you have in non-retirement assets? Will help give a better picture of your financial situation.

I'm not sure what your retirement plans are, but if you only have $150k for retirement now and set aside the max contribution in a ROTH IRA each year (assuming 11k max (5500 for each of you) - you may not be happy with the results. If that is the case I would use at least some of that 100-200k you have laying around and beef up your retirement assets a bit with index/mutual funds that get a decent returns and let you capitalize on long term compounding. Slow, steady, and reasonably wealthy at retirement beats fast, risky, and potentially broke/hurting at retirement if you ask me.

I'm heavily invested in various american funds, and they have done well for me over the
years. You might want to check the following funds out.

American Funds Income Fund of America Cl AAMECX
American Funds Fundamental Investors AANCFX
American Funds Growth Fund of America Cl AAGTHX
American Funds EuroPacific Growth Cl AAEPGX
American Funds Capital World Growth & Income Cl ACWGIX
American Funds AMCAP Cl AAMCPX
American Funds International Growth & Income Cl AIGAAX
American Funds Bond Fund of America Cl AABNDX
American Funds Small-Cap World Cl ASMCWX
American Funds New World Cl ANEWFX
American Funds American Balanced AABALX

The fundamental investors and growth fund of america have done particularly well for me over the last 10 years. Of all the american fund shares I own, roughly 60-70% are in those two funds. The remaining 30-40% is sprinkled throughout the other funds I listed.

Note - most american funds are front load funds, but the load decreases as you hit asset milestones. Eventually the front load is reduced to almost nothing (or nothing in some funds).

I won't pretend to be an expert in the stock market. But I have done well for myself shooting for decent (6-8%) returns on diversified investments and using the age old dollar cost averaging approach. Started investing at age 19 and hit the $1M mark earlier this year. Compound returns are powerful.
 
Last edited:
FOREX!

But seriously, Vanguard is my favorite company for low expense mutual funds and ETFs. If you set up an account directly with them you can add fund shares without any trading fees.

Schwab also has some good low-expense funds if you already have a brokerage account there.

Vanguard - total international index, both developed and emerging markets (VGTSX)
>> "Also available as a lower-cost Admiral™ Shares mutual fund and an ETF."
https://personal.vanguard.com/us/FundsSnapshot?FundId=0113&FundIntExt=INT

The Vanguard Target funds (Target 2040, 45, ...) are an interesting choice since it is a fund of index funds, that shifts over time to include more bond fund shares. If I were getting shares of it I'd pick a year after I plan to retire (for example 2050 instead of 2040), to be more aggressive about staying in stocks.

Thanks. This is exactly the type of thing I was hoping to learn by starting this thread. I'll dig in more this weekend.

I would look into doing this. You say you have between $100 and 200k to invest. I would maybe consider doing the following:
Max out a solo 401k and her 401k. Make up any salary deficit this causes out of the $100-200k. This reduces your tax liability for the years you are able to do this which can be significant if you are above or in the midst of any deduction cuts offs or phase outs.

Max out her Roth as well. Not only because any tax advantaged space >>>> taxable space but because Roth IRAs have a nice withdrawal option if you think there is a chance you would retire early
http://www.rothira.com/blog/what-is-rule-72t

I don't think your situation is anything fancy enough to pay an annual % to someone to manage. Take a look at the bogleheads link posted for some good ideas. You may also be able to find a fee-only adviser to help you come up with a plan. It could be just a one time fee for advice and help with setup and away you go

One of the biggest things you need to determine is how well you tolerate risk. And I don't mean 'I am taking risk because I think I should' but know your actual ability to watch money vanish from your accounts. If you can't stomach watching 50% of your balance vanish then you will want to have a less risky portfolio than 100% stocks.* Sure it might not return as much with a safer mix of bonds but it will return more than you panicking and selling at or near the bottom. Many people say they can tolerate risk but looking at how many fled the markets in 2008 and 09 show that a huge percentage were fooling themselves

*Opinions vary about the stock\bond mix by age so this was just an easy math example

I'm fine with risk in the context of investing the pool of 200k I initially mentioned. Like I said, it's not the nest egg and I think I'm still pretty young, so I'm willing to assume more risk in the pursuit of higher gains. Nothing crazy of course. See my response to Sho'Nuff for more information.

Would you mind ballparking what you have in non-retirement assets? Will help give a better picture of your financial situation.

I'm not sure what your retirement plans are, but if you only have $150k for retirement now and set aside the max contribution in a ROTH IRA each year (assuming 11k max (5500 for each of you) - you may not be happy with the results. If that is the case I would use at least some of that 100-200k you have laying around and beef up your retirement assets a bit with index/mutual funds that get a decent returns and let you capitalize on long term compounding. Slow, steady, and reasonably wealthy at retirement beats fast, risky, and potentially broke/hurting at retirement if you ask me.

I'm heavily invested in various american funds, and they have done well for me over the
years. You might want to check the following funds out.

American Funds Income Fund of America Cl AAMECX
American Funds Fundamental Investors AANCFX
American Funds Growth Fund of America Cl AAGTHX
American Funds EuroPacific Growth Cl AAEPGX
American Funds Capital World Growth & Income Cl ACWGIX
American Funds AMCAP Cl AAMCPX
American Funds International Growth & Income Cl AIGAAX
American Funds Bond Fund of America Cl AABNDX
American Funds Small-Cap World Cl ASMCWX
American Funds New World Cl ANEWFX
American Funds American Balanced AABALX

The fundamental investors and growth fund of america have done particularly well for me over the last 10 years. Of all the american fund shares I own, roughly 60-70% are in those two funds. The remaining 30-40% is sprinkled throughout the other funds I listed.

Note - most american funds are front load funds, but the load decreases as you hit asset milestones. Eventually the front load is reduced to almost nothing (or nothing in some funds).

I won't pretend to be an expert in the stock market. But I have done well for myself shooting for decent (6-8%) returns on diversified investments and using the age old dollar cost averaging approach. Started investing at age 19 and hit the $1M mark earlier this year. Compound returns are powerful.

Assets:
1) 225k in an investment property (started as my primary residence, turned it into an investment); $1300/mo to principal + a trivial amount of cash flow; 18 years left on the loan
2) 160k in a commercial building; $1180/mo to principal + $500/mo cash flow; 23 years left on the loan
3) 50k in a residential investment property (my mother in law lives in it); her payment covers my exact costs, which also puts $400/mo into principal; 28 years left on the loan
4) 45k in my primary residence; 8 years left on the loan
5) 150k in retirement accounts
6) 200k to be invested (the money I mentioned in the OP)
7) 30k in checking/savings
8) I'm not counting things like cars because I consider them to be a total loss for the purposes of this thread. All 3 cars are paid off and probably worth 40k.
9) I'm not counting any of my business assets simply to be conservative (it probably amounts to 100k, so not a game changer).
10 ) I'm not counting the 100k in the trusts for my kids' college educations.
Total = 860k + 40k/year from real estate principal/cash flow

My retirement plans:
1) All 4 properties (3 investment + 1 primary) paid off; I may pick up an additional investment property or two and those would ideally be paid off as well
2) Investment properties generating sufficient income to cover the monthly nut (my projections say I should be getting roughly $8000/mo net by then assuming no debt)
3) Kids kicked out of the nest no later than 22 unless they have a damn good reason (this has nothing to do with the thread, but you asked for my plans =P)
4) retirement funds will be used as necessary, but I don't see why I even need any of it at the moment
5) I'm assuming the US will be bankrupt and social security will be 0/mo. Any amount I get from this fund will be spent in its entirety on hookers and blow.

I'm currently saving my wife's entire paycheck in one form or another. That will continue for the foreseeable future, which will amount to at least 30k/year put into something. If I lose the entire 200k tomorrow, it probably won't change a whole lot. We spend what we have to spend and not much more - a behavior that hasn't changed despite several increases in monthly income over the years. I suspect that will continue for at least the next 10 years, which should allow us to continue saving a substantial amount per year.

I'm a big fan of "slow and steady wins the race" with few exceptions. I'm willing to take more risks with the money in question, though, because I feel pretty good about the trajectory of my entire portfolio. Maybe I'm wrong, but that's why I'm asking for advice.
 
MorningStar.com would be a great place to post this question.

I'm a huge advocate of long term savings, and at your (our) age, you could easily turn that 200k into several million by the age of 65 with compound interest. I'd recommend throwing most of it into an S&P 500 index fund through vanguard, and pretending it never existed until you retire.

That or pay off some of that debt.

If you really really want to (risk) invest it into something "exciting", why not all 200k in a good dividend fund with low expense ratio? Would net you small change each month for awhile.
 
Assets:
1) 225k in an investment property (started as my primary residence, turned it into an investment); $1300/mo to principal + a trivial amount of cash flow; 18 years left on the loan
2) 160k in a commercial building; $1180/mo to principal + $500/mo cash flow; 23 years left on the loan
3) 50k in a residential investment property (my mother in law lives in it); her payment covers my exact costs, which also puts $400/mo into principal; 28 years left on the loan
4) 45k in my primary residence; 8 years left on the loan
5) 150k in retirement accounts
6) 200k to be invested (the money I mentioned in the OP)
7) 30k in checking/savings
8) I'm not counting things like cars because I consider them to be a total loss for the purposes of this thread. All 3 cars are paid off and probably worth 40k.
9) I'm not counting any of my business assets simply to be conservative (it probably amounts to 100k, so not a game changer).
10 ) I'm not counting the 100k in the trusts for my kids' college educations.
Total = 860k + 40k/year from real estate principal/cash flow

My retirement plans:
1) All 4 properties (3 investment + 1 primary) paid off; I may pick up an additional investment property or two and those would ideally be paid off as well
2) Investment properties generating sufficient income to cover the monthly nut (my projections say I should be getting roughly $8000/mo net by then assuming no debt)
3) Kids kicked out of the nest no later than 22 unless they have a damn good reason (this has nothing to do with the thread, but you asked for my plans =P)
4) retirement funds will be used as necessary, but I don't see why I even need any of it at the moment
5) I'm assuming the US will be bankrupt and social security will be 0/mo. Any amount I get from this fund will be spent in its entirety on hookers and blow.

Nice. You are doing well for yourself! Especially as you are so young (I think you said you were 29).

Re: the investment properties - its good that they are generating positive cash flow, but lets not forget that you are in the rental business. Some of that cash flow will eventually be needed to maintain those properties, so I would be socking it away somewhere relatively safe and maintain it for the business. It takes one bad tenant one day to damage a house/apartment enough to wash away many $6k/yr gains.

In other words - I would not count your current rental cash flow as personal capital, but rather as business capital for your rental business.

Second - your are clearly heavily invested in real estate, but you have a (relatively) light presence in the market. I still think you would be best served by beefing up your current retirement (or non-retirement) investments with some index/mutual funds, and with a goal to capitalize on long term gains. If you put that 200k into funds that give you a 7% year over year return, that 200k should be 400+k by the time you are 40, 800k by the time you are 50, and 1.6M by the time you are 60. And that assumes you add nothing else to the egg. That would be my preferred approach, because while you are young and doing reasonably well, you do not have enough to justify gambling 25% of your total assets chasing higher gains. Also - the principal value of real estate generally does not compound. You are ignoring/under utilizing one of the most powerful forces in the universe by focusing so heavily on real estate.

Of course, that approach is no fun. So why not split the difference? Beef up your market presence some (e.g., by $125k in mutual funds) and use the remainder to chase higher yields (bearing in mind you might lose it all)?

I don't regularly watch investment shows, but I watched one about 10 years ago and the speaker said something that really resonated with me. He said that he approaches the stock market like he approaches eating whole fish sushi. When he eats sushi, he doesn;t eat the head or the tail. He eats the middle, and is satisfied. Likewise when he is looking for returns in the market, he doesn't chase the highest returns (the "head") or the lowest (the "tail"), he shoots for modest returns and is satisfied. Boooooooring. I know. But it gets the job done and you aren't quite at the point yet (IMO) where you can start playing Warren Buffet with such a large portion of your assets.

Good luck and let us know what you decide to do.

I'm a big fan of "slow and steady wins the race" with few exceptions. I'm willing to take more risks with the money in question, though, because I feel pretty good about the trajectory of my entire portfolio. Maybe I'm wrong, but that's why I'm asking for advice.

With respect, I think you are not completely wrong, but you are wrong to some degree. In your portfolio $200k is a really large chunk. Too much to be gambling on high risk investments that have a very real possibility of netting you a total loss. If you had $1M (or even $500k) in retirement investments now I would probably feel otherwise. But you don't (yet). Get that part of your portfolio built up some more and then start playing around.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top