Intimidation in Iran

[dmcowen674]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: Jaskalas

Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Why would or should they rise up against their President, the U.S. hasn't risen up against Bush.

Iconic herein, of the greater hatred for our country than for those who hate and seek to kill people in our country. That is why when it comes to Islamic Supermacism and nuclear weapons your chief concern is forcibly removing anyone who wants to STOP the Islamists.

You are a traitor to this nation, and in your heart have convictions of treason against all of western civilization.

LOL, whether you realize it or not you are as looney as Dave:laugh:

To borrow from another loon "Radicalism is a mental disorder".

 

[palehorse]

Originally posted by: Lemon law
Palehorse74 paranoia at its finest---On July 17, 2006, Arya News Agency reported an expedition of two "martyrdom-units," one consisting of eighteen and the second consisting of nine "martyrdom-seekers," to Lebanon. At demonstrations in Tehran and Tabriz ten days later, sixty Iranian volunteers declared their readiness for holy war. There was also a rally in Rasht, capital of the Caspian province of Gilan, on July 29. But despite the bravado, Iranian police stopped a caravan of self-described "martyrdom-seekers" at the Turkish border.

And here it is 50 days later and amazingly, the world has not ended. And good and bad things totally unrelated to palehorses74's latest worry continue to keep occurring as we all discover lots of shit happens all the time.

As for palehorses74 conclusion---I think you're nuts man. You could be slapped across the face with a live trout and still deny the existence of fish...

I think palehorse74 could be slapped with a minnow and think it a whale. Which is just another way to say he is making a mountain out of a molehill again. And worse yet palehorse74's remedy for every slap is to deliver a greater counterslap right back. Which sadly is a recipe for making a mountain out of a molehill.

uhg, just like you to come to "the rescue" of someone who is completely wrong.

The entire point was that Aimster posted a bold-faced lie, so I called him on it. His post wasn't even directed at me, but I took issue with the blatant nature of the lie itself.

So I really don't care if it's a mountain or a molehill. All I care about is seeing Aimster admit that his assertion - that Persians don't partake in the suicidal craziness - is blatantly false.

Persians do partake in, and encourage, the suicidal craziness; Aimster is wrong; and your post was simply pointless.

AFAIC, you're both nuttier than a jar full of Skippy! I think you're made for eachother! Perhaps you should meet up some place in Iowa...

 

[imported_Lothar]

Originally posted by: Pabster

Originally posted by: Lemon law
The point being the USA supported a Shah and got an Ayatollah and the Mullahs.

Can you recall who supported (and installed) that Shah?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d
Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower.