• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

interesting theory about evolution.

TanisHalfElven

Diamond Member
i am taking the book empire from the ashes as something like a starting point.

now for those who haven't read Empire from the ashes by david webber it lays out a back story of something like this.

ALL humans currently on the earth are descended from and an space empire of humans who landed on earth some 50 millenia ago and lost their technology (i will not explain why but it is very belivable).

well it explains the link by saying that before that human empire there was a non-human empire that repopulated that earth of homo-sapians and all other species after an attack that destroyed all life on earth (including the dinosaours).

In the book religions (all not just one) were used by a rebel group of "imperials" to controls the terra population.

is that plausible ? i;m thinking seems like something that could explain why even after all the evolutionary proof we have people who stronly argue against it. also would explain why evolution theory is not perfect.

argue and enjoy.
 
You'll need to explain it better before I can comment. This sentence (?) is perplexing:

well it explains the link by saying that before that human empire there was a non-human empire that repopulated that earth of homo-sapians and all other species after an attack that destroyed all life on earth (including the dinosaours).
 
it doesn't take science fiction to explain the ignorant masses. sounds like an interesting story, but that's all it is.

what I mean is that there is an explanation for why people deny evolution: they simply want to.

btw...please, no more evolution threads.
 
Originally posted by: tanishalfelven
is that plausible ? i;m thinking seems like something that could explain why even after all the evolutionary proof we have people who stronly argue against it. also would explain why evolution theory is not perfect.

Evolution is fact and unless something has recently come up, it is perfect.

As for the people who refuse to believe...well, they're brainwashed by what they've read in a book or by how they've been raised.
 
LMAO. A super race of humans that can travel through space and time but somehow lose their technology once they reach Earth. Please tell me you're not really that gullible. I mean, seriously.
 
I'm pretty sure that the people who argue against evolution would also argue against the idea that we were populated by aliens or anything that does not involve a divine entity.
 
Originally posted by: LoKe
Originally posted by: tanishalfelven
is that plausible ? i;m thinking seems like something that could explain why even after all the evolutionary proof we have people who stronly argue against it. also would explain why evolution theory is not perfect.

Evolution is fact and unless something has recently come up, it is perfect.

As for the people who refuse to believe...well, they're brainwashed by what they've read in a book or by how they've been raised.

Evolution is a theory, and it's not perfect in that's it is still be modified. There was something not too long announce, some new alteration based on a recent discovery. Just can't remember the details now.

50 millenia? That would be 5 million years ago. Funny we have found no fossils yet.

Anyhoo, seems more like an explaination for abiogenisis (sp?) than evolution.

Fern
 
Originally posted by: LoKe
Originally posted by: tanishalfelven
is that plausible ? i;m thinking seems like something that could explain why even after all the evolutionary proof we have people who stronly argue against it. also would explain why evolution theory is not perfect.

Evolution is fact and unless something has recently come up, it is perfect.

As for the people who refuse to believe...well, they're brainwashed by what they've read in a book or by how they've been raised.

Although I believe in evolution, I think to label anything as 'fact' is inherently defeating the unstable concept itself. At the end of the day there is no way to know... only ways to assume. And what good is assumption?
 
Back
Top