• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Interesting Stats on Military Support For Obama

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
It has been stated here before, and assumed, that the members of our military are, by and large, anti-Obama and anti-Dem. Here is some hard data from military.com that indicates otherwise:

Political donations from servicemembers and others connected with the military are shifting from presidential candidate Ron Paul to President Obama, according to analysis released this week.

Paul, the Texas Republican congressman, long was the favorite among military givers, but donors' focus shifted to Obama in March, according to federal elections data analyzed by the Center for Responsive Politics.

"Until recently, the military has been a stalwart source of support for Republican hopeful Ron Paul," wrote analyst Russ Choma. "But in March, it was Obama that scooped up the most support from the armed forces -- about twice as much as Paul, in fact. Romney remains an also-ran when it comes to backing from the military."

From January 2011 until March, servicemembers who gave more than $200 contributed about $333,134 to Paul's campaign, as compared to about $184,505 for Obama and just $45,738 to Republican frontrunner Mitt Romney, according to an analysis by the center.

"But in March, Obama and Paul switched places," Choma wrote. "Members of the military sent $36,448 to Obama and just $17,733 to Paul. Even though Romney solidified his position as the presumptive Republican nominee, military donations to his campaign remained anemic -- only $8,630."

The numbers reflect individual donations of more than $200 – givers don't have to provide as much information with smaller ones – and only those in which givers volunteered their connections with the military services. (An Army nurse who listed "nurse," as opposed to "soldier," with a contribution, for example, wouldn't be counted with the Army donors.) So there is no way to track the precise amounts and breakdowns for the armed forces.

Of records that do include such details, Obama's best source of donations was the Department of Defense; Romney's was the Army and so was Paul's. The center did not include contributions to other candidates as part of its analysis this week.

If Obama's fundraising edge among troops continues to build, it would be a repeat of his performance in 2008 when for a time troops were giving to Obama as much as six to one over his Republican opponent, Arizona Sen. John McCain.

That was a shift, however, in the historical alignment of the force, according to the center's analysis. In earlier cycles, military donors tended to give more to Republicans. In 2000, then Texas Gov. George W. Bush, the Republican outraised Democratic Vice President Al Gore almost 2 to 1 among military donors.

Campaign contributions give a rare look into the political views of the armed services, in which many members refrain from talking openly about which candidates they support and why. Although servicemembers retain their first amendment rights to free speech, they're mostly forbidden from speaking out politically while in uniform.

Seems like, collectively, by this one measurable metric, donations over $200, military members first love was Dr. Paul, but that, even in March when Romney was all but assured the Rep nomination, service members showed Obama the love by a SIX to ONE margin over Mitt.

And that SIX to ONE margin was the same rate they favored Obama over one of their own in the last election, John McCain.

Interesting.
 
Does this mean the revolution will have to wait for four more years? 😛

Our first woman president, the honorable Hilary Clinton, would indeed be a somewhat revolutionary event. That she might then be caught, spanks down, in a revenge psuedo-lesbian three way with Madeline Albright and Condoleezza Rice would just be a fantasy tabloid bonus.

Seeing First Man Bill trying to act sincerely outraged? Priceless! 😛
 
I think Obama has really missed the boat in a few areas. But I think as far as the wars and his military calls, he has been spot on. So I can see how some servicemen are giving him the nod, because he has shown some faith in them and done a nice job on making sure they get the credit they deserve.
 
He needs to get us out of Afghanistan pronto, but at least he hasn't started any new protracted land wars.
 
While I somewhat agree with Perknose, Perknose has failed to mention how badly recent US
quagmires has played in damaging the very rational US military reserve system.

On one hand we can demonize wasting money on weekend warriors, but when in the hour of US needs, those same weekend warriors can form a basis for a national mobilization so lacking in WW2. As weekend warriors are far cheaper than a large standing army.

But when we then rely on only weekend warriors to fight our quarmires, and saddle then with with endless deployments while career military enlistees get cushy jobs else where, why should any rational person enlist in the military reserves? Patriotism is one thing, stupidity and slavery is quite another. We threat our national military reserves with total disrespect and then expect they will not vote with their feet., and say, thanks but no thanks, we may be patriotic but not total fools.
 
Hmmm wonder how the wolves feel. 11b through special forcew. Military is.basically q.welfare prograk these days so not suprized most would opt to continue it
 
if history has taught me one thing, it's that military support should decide our civilian leaders.

You know, I was actually thinking the other day how strange it was that there had not been a serious attempt at a military coup in the US since the Civil War (not that I count it, but I don't want to get into a semantic debate over it). That itself is a pretty good testament to the overall stability of American Democracy.
 
Our first woman president, the honorable Hilary Clinton, would indeed be a somewhat revolutionary event. That she might then be caught, spanks down, in a revenge psuedo-lesbian three way with Madeline Albright and Condoleezza Rice would just be a fantasy tabloid bonus.

Seeing First Man Bill trying to act sincerely outraged? Priceless! 😛

Sounds like a cellulite fetishists wet dream. D:
 
Our first woman president, the honorable Hilary Clinton, would indeed be a somewhat revolutionary event. That she might then be caught, spanks down, in a revenge psuedo-lesbian three way with Madeline Albright and Condoleezza Rice would just be a fantasy tabloid bonus.

Seeing First Man Bill trying to act sincerely outraged? Priceless! 😛
WARNING! Positing any theoretical situation where Madeline Albright might be less than fully clothed threatens to break the Internet!
 
are we still piping in the Rush Radio show to the troops?

I'm not sure political donations - which lower-level troops contribute....zero percent of - are good indicators that our troops, in large part, favor one party over another.

We are talking about a very small percentage of active military people actually donating money here folks.
 
Damn I didn't know that Obama beat McCain 6 to 1..

Maybe Arizona or Texas really is up for grabs. We all know that the racist, bigoted, wicked Republican party is going to have to change or just go away. Maybe it happens this next election cycle.
 
are we still piping in the Rush Radio show to the troops?

I'm not sure political donations - which lower-level troops contribute....zero percent of - are good indicators that our troops, in large part, favor one party over another.

We are talking about a very small percentage of active military people actually donating money here folks.

Though it seems logical to me that those troops who donate will vote, and those that don't is less likely to vote, which is what really matters, politically speaking.
 
Damn I didn't know that Obama beat McCain 6 to 1..

Maybe Arizona or Texas really is up for grabs. We all know that the racist, bigoted, wicked Republican party is going to have to change or just go away. Maybe it happens this next election cycle.

Yea, we all know that there is no racism in the (D) base.

It is just as bad as not worse. Unless, of course, you think the 8 MS13 and Black killings in LA tonight don't represent the (D) base.
 
I remember being a conservative in 1999 and being against nation building... something happened between here and there: but I think it lost the republicans the respect of the military...
 
I have been in the Army 13 years now. The support for Paul is pretty damn high among military members.

That said, with the overwhelming push to blackout Paul in the media it seems to have influenced some of those in uniform. The military is going to generally side with the peace candidate.

I will admit, even though Libya was a mistake in my opinion. President Obama is managing the Bush disasters fairly well.

And I find it amusing calling the military a welfare program.
 
Hmmm wonder how the wolves feel. 11b through special forcew. Military is.basically q.welfare prograk these days so not suprized most would opt to continue it

I think I know who hijacked your account (see post 17).

The $200 & above limit to me suggests that these are mostly contributions by officers and really politically active individuals. The average soldier's budget is too tight to be throwing away $200+ on a politician.
 
When i was in the Navy from 93-97 most seemed to love Clinton at the time and most had voted for him from what i remember. I think its sort of a myth that the military is usually pro GOP.
 
Back
Top