"Interesting" new / old power the house gave itself.

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
73,622
35,371
136
The IRS scandal started in 2013, it's still going on, it never stopped and it won't stop until we get the partisan progressives out of the IRS. There are still conservative groups that have yet to get their legally allowed status of 501(c)4.
The IRS denied status to conservative groups because the groups weren't qualified for the status. There wasn't a political agenda, simply the IRS following the law. Conservatives hate it when the law applies to them.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,686
136
That assertion regrettably has nothing to do with the fact that you claimed the power of the Executive was being usurped.

That's the power of the chief executive to set pay scales for the civil service, obviously.
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
17,018
5,080
136
Oh, please. Attribution of partisanship to civil servants is bullshit.



Thank you.

I suspect Taj hails from, or dreams of, an authoritative regime where all civil servants must swear allegiance to the ruling party or lose their jobs.
 

HamburgerBoy

Lifer
Apr 12, 2004
27,111
318
126
Director of the FBI is a political appointment.

Not sure what distinction you're making here. What the OP/Google tells me is that the Holman Rule is in theory applicable to any federal employee. Jhhnn suggested that civil service agencies aren't partisan (at least to a significant degree), after tajmahal accused the EPA of having an "entrenched and partisan civil service workforce". The administrator of the EPA is a political appointment too.