• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

"Interesting" new / old power the house gave itself.

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
The IRS scandal started in 2013, it's still going on, it never stopped and it won't stop until we get the partisan progressives out of the IRS. There are still conservative groups that have yet to get their legally allowed status of 501(c)4.
The IRS denied status to conservative groups because the groups weren't qualified for the status. There wasn't a political agenda, simply the IRS following the law. Conservatives hate it when the law applies to them.
 
Oh, please. Attribution of partisanship to civil servants is bullshit.



Thank you.

I suspect Taj hails from, or dreams of, an authoritative regime where all civil servants must swear allegiance to the ruling party or lose their jobs.
 
Director of the FBI is a political appointment.

Not sure what distinction you're making here. What the OP/Google tells me is that the Holman Rule is in theory applicable to any federal employee. Jhhnn suggested that civil service agencies aren't partisan (at least to a significant degree), after tajmahal accused the EPA of having an "entrenched and partisan civil service workforce". The administrator of the EPA is a political appointment too.
 
Back
Top