- Jan 25, 2000
- 10,155
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: ROTC1983
Ouch, the tapes are really expensive. If people actually catch on though, they should sink in price soon enough. Aren't DVDs smaller and of the same or better quality?
Originally posted by: Shiva112
Can these things have menus, DVDROM content, etc?
Originally posted by: J1600B
Originally posted by: Shiva112
Can these things have menus, DVDROM content, etc?
Doubtful. Unless they have a really good software in the machine that can read and store menus/etc after insertion and play accordingly. It has some potential, but it seems a day late and a dollar short. I'd say there is probably a lot more potential for error on a tape than a DVD, but on the upside at least the tape will continue playing...
I doubt it will catch on because it just "seems" like an older technology.
Originally posted by: BennyD
Originally posted by: J1600B
Originally posted by: Shiva112
Can these things have menus, DVDROM content, etc?
Doubtful. Unless they have a really good software in the machine that can read and store menus/etc after insertion and play accordingly. It has some potential, but it seems a day late and a dollar short. I'd say there is probably a lot more potential for error on a tape than a DVD, but on the upside at least the tape will continue playing...
I doubt it will catch on because it just "seems" like an older technology.
it would be quite simple to add menus ect, it would just have a longer load time.
that 50gb is including a hell of a lot of error correction, theres probably room for about 70-80gb on the tape but some is duplicated to stop errors
Originally posted by: Jugernot
Errr... these have been out for years guys.... it's not new.
It first came our for Satelites recordings and has been adapted to HDTV. It isn't going to fail, but it isn't going to take off either. Tapes suck.
