wccftech.com
Of course, it's a tendency to put in electricity anyway...Intel's Former CEO Pat Gelsinger Says He Underestimated The Impact of AI — A Misstep That Left Team Blue Struggling to Catch Up
Intel's ex-CEO acknowledged the company's "delayed" response to AI, but he has now claimed that the technology's impact was miscalculated.
if you mean the action of swan and kranzich than sure pat's two isses were not focusing on GPGPU and overbuilding fabs that's it i never liked their Germany and Poland expansions.
It was Pat Gelsinger that recognized the power wall during the Netburst days before anyone did.
If he had gotten the architecture teams at Intel to start a brand new core the minute he started at Intel, we could've been enjoying the fruit of that labor by now. I think age affected his judgement. He took the job for granted. Judging by Meteor Lake and Arrow Lake architectures, it's like he spent 5 minutes with those teams in total and distracted by the grand fab plans he was looking at the whole time, he distractedly said, "Oh sure. Go ahead. I trust you guys will do fine".
Isn't that what the unified core is supposed to be? And I don't know the exact timeline but wasn't unified core started during his time as CEO once Royal Core/Royal Cove was scrapped?
Yes it was started under pat and he scrapped Royal sometimes early last year
He started it too late. I think in 2024. No idea if "his" unified core will make it to the finishing line without being modified due to whatever personnel changes during LBT's tenure.
He started as soon as it became clear Royal was S### and he saw skymonts and P core team is not helping matters.
man you can tell you have never worked in anything of complexity + size + development. you sure your not Elon?
Strange article. To me it reads as the ramblings of a delusional self-proclaimed expert. He's interpreting critical failures to achieve very difficult engineering feats as business strategy. He's failing to connect the failure to achieve an easier feat (18A) with the inherent doom that spells for the next, more difficult feat (14A).
LOL as long as they hit their 2027 target for +ve FCF it's fine for 18A cause 18A missed the cycle in 2022-23 when the customer should have gotten PDKs.
No, they are also incompetent
11 laid off driver-related employees in Oregon alone. And many test/validation positions listed too.
Facebook
Twitter