Question Intel's future after Pat Gelsinger

Page 26 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

DavidC1

Golden Member
Dec 29, 2023
1,538
2,531
96
They designed a system so bad that they have hundreds of unresolved tickets open and they were asking everybody for patience in the financial industry that they managed to make a mess of with their proposed product. Don't want to go into too much detail because I don't want any blowback in my real life for speaking out the truth. This is an absolutely dumb and desperate "corporate" move by LBT.
Yea and imagine what happens to Intel when the AI hype train crashes in a ball of flaming fire that makes 2001 dot-com bubble look like a picnic on Saturday?

Where is this amazing engineer that fixes the mistakes pat made?
 
  • Like
Reactions: igor_kavinski
Jul 27, 2020
25,200
17,526
146
It took removal of 3 bean counters and putting 1 engineer in charge to fix this mess
Sorry. That engineer wasn't bright enough. He should've stuck to engineering rather than trying to save a company. You don't hire me when you have a medical emergency. Even I would not recommend that despite my above average understanding of most medical matters. I'm not trained by professionals so no one should hire me to save someone's life. Ditto for Gelsinger. He was the wrong person for the job. Would've worked better as a CTO.
 

511

Platinum Member
Jul 12, 2024
2,481
2,279
106
Sorry. That engineer wasn't bright enough. He should've stuck to engineering rather than trying to save a company. You don't hire me when you have a medical emergency. Even I would not recommend that despite my above average understanding of most medical matters. I'm not trained by professionals so no one should hire me to save someone's life. Ditto for Gelsinger. He was the wrong person for the job. Would've worked better as a CTO.
you are a one man army you just need Jim Keller to save Intel 🤣
 
Jul 27, 2020
25,200
17,526
146
you are a one man army you just need Jim Keller to save Intel 🤣
Sadly, even he can't help Intel now. He's in bad shape health-wise. Best outcome for Intel right now (if thinking very narrowly) is for AMD and Intel to merge and spin off the fabs as a separate entity.

And yes, I'm Iron Man. Without the suit. Without the mega industrial empire. I'm just one man with a mission and a laptop. Change the world. Make it better. Are you with me?

Pentium 4 10 GHz FTW.

If you are not with me, you are against me.

*switches lightsaber on*
 
Jul 27, 2020
25,200
17,526
146
18AP/14A.
You really believe any company will seriously consider Intel after their Intel 7 oxidation, Intel 4 hot lots and Raptor Lake degradation bad publicity and delays? Those problems speak of a company where the head is running in one direction, the hands in another and the legs in a completely different direction from the other two body parts. No one will pay Intel serious money and bet their horses on Intel for something critical. They will pay charity money so Intel can keep the lights on. Does Intel want that? They flippin' better do because their survival depends on it.
 

Io Magnesso

Member
Jun 12, 2025
115
43
56
You really believe any company will seriously consider Intel after their Intel 7 oxidation, Intel 4 hot lots and Raptor Lake degradation bad publicity and delays? Those problems speak of a company where the head is running in one direction, the hands in another and the legs in a completely different direction from the other two body parts. No one will pay Intel serious money and bet their horses on Intel for something critical. They will pay charity money so Intel can keep the lights on. Does Intel want that? They flippin' better do because their survival depends on it.
Raptor Lake's degradation problem is a clock tree control algorithm problem.
As a result of the high voltage flowing out of sight at all times, the wiring is cut off.
I don't think there was a problem with the "Intel 7" itself.
Certainly, I've heard that the Intel 7 wafers, which had failed wiring, were confirmed.
It is said that it has already been processed at the inspection stage.
 
Jul 27, 2020
25,200
17,526
146
Yeah, well, I need a 14900KS to check for myself. Please ask your Intel friends to supply me with one free of charge for my unbiased appraisal of the situation.
 

Io Magnesso

Member
Jun 12, 2025
115
43
56
Yeah, well, I need a 14900KS to check for myself. Please ask your Intel friends to supply me with one free of charge for my unbiased appraisal of the situation.
It's a pity, I don't have a Raptor Lake
However, I have the same Alder Lake Core i7 12700K made by the same Intel 7 process.
 

511

Platinum Member
Jul 12, 2024
2,481
2,279
106
You really believe any company will seriously consider Intel after their Intel 7 oxidation, Intel 4 hot lots and Raptor Lake degradation bad publicity and delays?
First Intel 7 oxidation is not a process issue and regarding hot lots you can run hot lots if you pay good enough.
As it turns out, Intel did have an early manufacturing flaw in the enhanced version of the Intel 7 process node used to build Raptor Lake. According to a post made by Intel to Reddit this afternoon, a “via Oxidation manufacturing issue” was addressed in 2023.
So it was a process issue unique to raptor lake I take back what I said.

Raptor Lake degradation it's mostly on design if ARL Suddenly starts consuming 1.6V core voltage it will kill itself like Raptor Lake do you think it's TSMC fault than?

Those problems speak of a company where the head is running in one direction, the hands in another and the legs in a completely different direction from the other two body parts. No one will pay Intel serious money and bet their horses on Intel for something critical. They will pay charity money so Intel can keep the lights on. Does Intel want that? They flippin' better do because their survival depends on it.
They will lol if you want cheap deals everyone loves making money and saving money at the same time.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Io Magnesso

Thunder 57

Diamond Member
Aug 19, 2007
3,747
6,329
136
First Intel 7 oxidation is not a process issue and regarding hot lots you can run hot lots if you pay good enough.

So it was a process issue unique to raptor lake I take back what I said.

Raptor Lake degradation it's mostly on design if ARL Suddenly starts consuming 1.6V core voltage it will kill itself like Raptor Lake do you think it's TSMC fault than?


They will lol if you want cheap deals everyone loves making money and saving money at the same time.

Why haven't we seen anyone jump on 18A then?
 
  • Like
Reactions: igor_kavinski

511

Platinum Member
Jul 12, 2024
2,481
2,279
106
Why haven't we seen anyone jump on 18A then?
Most company went with N2 before 18A PDK were released and 18A initial PDK were very bad it took them to sort out and they are late better to go to a superior process in N2 vs 18A.

Also 18A doesn't address Mobile People cause it has too many missing stuff
 
  • Like
Reactions: Io Magnesso

Io Magnesso

Member
Jun 12, 2025
115
43
56
First Intel 7 oxidation is not a process issue and regarding hot lots you can run hot lots if you pay good enough.

So it was a process issue unique to raptor lake I take back what I said.

Raptor Lake degradation it's mostly on design if ARL Suddenly starts consuming 1.6V core voltage it will kill itself like Raptor Lake do you think it's TSMC fault than?


They will lol if you want cheap deals everyone loves making money and saving money at the same time.
However, the "via oxidation manufacturing issue" itself was detected by inspection before the problematic wafers and chips were on the market, and were dealt with.
I think we can deal with it before the problem spreads outside the company.
In that respect, it's still decent
Personally, I wouldn't say that the 10nm or later process is not a problem. I think it's solid to some extent
Of course it's better than Samsung.
 

Hitman928

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2012
6,640
12,238
136
However, the "via oxidation manufacturing issue" itself was detected by inspection before the problematic wafers and chips were on the market, and were dealt with.
I think we can deal with it before the problem spreads outside the company.
In that respect, it's still decent
Personally, I wouldn't say that the 10nm or later process is not a problem. I think it's solid to some extent
Of course it's better than Samsung.

There were chips with the oxidation issue in the open market for quite some time.
 

Io Magnesso

Member
Jun 12, 2025
115
43
56
There were chips with the oxidation issue in the open market for quite some time.
Of course, there may be some initial defects.
I will not deny it
It's possible that it didn't go to the market at all.
I don't know the truth because the Raptor Lake problem overlapped with the topic
Only Intel knows the truth
Well, Raptor's uniform warranty period has been extended to 5 years, so even if you encounter it, you can get a replacement.
Well, I don't know if it's an oxidation problem or if it's caused by the deterioration of Raptor Lake's clock tree unless I use precision equipment.
 
Last edited:

Hitman928

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2012
6,640
12,238
136
Of course, there may be some initial defects.
I will not deny it
It's possible that it didn't go to the market at all.
I don't know the truth because the Raptor Lake problem overlapped with the topic
Only Intel knows the truth
Well, Raptor's uniform warranty period has been extended to 5 years, so even if you encounter it, you can get a replacement.
Well, I don't know if it's an oxidation problem or if it's caused by the deterioration of Raptor Lake's clock tree unless I use precision equipment.

Intel admitted that defective products were still in the market for over a year after the oxidation issue was discovered.
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
31,541
31,117
146
Intel admitted that defective products were still in the market for over a year after the oxidation issue was discovered.
Thanks for correcting the misinformation, as it runs rampant if left unchecked. Those CPUs were still on shelves in early 2024. The 5 year warranty might give some the warm fuzzies, but it is no consolation when your time is money workflow goes to zero because your CPU is broken. That warranty isn't going to cover your lost revenue. It isn't going to get back those lost evenings and weekends gaming with your friends while waiting for the replacement either. It's just dumb talking points and cope, and I was hoping we were past that now.

Tan looks to be following SOP for cost cutting. It also was a good move, sending a message to the workers that design and build the products, that they are going to be treated with the deference and importance they deserve. And that a lot of the systemic issues interfering with their work and progress are being removed.
 

Io Magnesso

Member
Jun 12, 2025
115
43
56
Thanks for correcting the misinformation, as it runs rampant if left unchecked. Those CPUs were still on shelves in early 2024. The 5 year warranty might give some the warm fuzzies, but it is no consolation when your time is money workflow goes to zero because your CPU is broken. That warranty isn't going to cover your lost revenue. It isn't going to get back those lost evenings and weekends gaming with your friends while waiting for the replacement either. It's just dumb talking points and cope, and I was hoping we were past that now.

Tan looks to be following SOP for cost cutting. It also was a good move, sending a message to the workers that design and build the products, that they are going to be treated with the deference and importance they deserve. And that a lot of the systemic issues interfering with their work and progress are being removed.
Sorry for the misunderstanding
I misunderstood because the discovery of the oxidation problem of Intel 7 was just around the same time as the Raptor Lake problem.
I have a question, is Raptor Lake-Refresh shipped after 2024, is this Intel 7 oxidation problem?
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
31,541
31,117
146
Sorry for the misunderstanding
I misunderstood because the discovery of the oxidation problem of Intel 7 was just around the same time as the Raptor Lake problem.
I have a question, is Raptor Lake-Refresh shipped after 2024, is this Intel 7 oxidation problem?
We have a thread on the issues chock-a-block with the chronology of issues, events, and information. If you read it, one of the things you will discover, is that Intel has failed at full disclosure.
 

511

Platinum Member
Jul 12, 2024
2,481
2,279
106
No one knows actually what is the real issue beside Intel cause we just had another microcode looks like broken design for P cores btw are E cores affected as well with this issue did someone has to tone down E core clocks?
 

Io Magnesso

Member
Jun 12, 2025
115
43
56
We have a thread on the issues chock-a-block with the chronology of issues, events, and information. If you read it, one of the things you will discover, is that Intel has failed at full disclosure.
Well, I understand that Intel has neglected to disclose information.
However, when the oxidation problem of the manufacturing process was announced, the Raptor problem I was confused because it was the same as the information disclosure of
I understand that the root cause of Raptor Lake's 13/14 generation problem is different from the oxidation problem.