SamMaster
Member
- Jun 26, 2010
- 165
- 103
- 116
That is good to read.
Yes, thankfully we have an authorized service provider that makes things easy for us (except for Dell, they make things difficult across the line).
That is good to read.
I agree with MarcCDB, there is no reason for anybody to buy any of the 13th or 14th gen Intel CPU's now that we have seen many reports of them dying at the mid and lower range levels as well as 1x900k.
I have tortured my 12700K a lot using Intel XTU. Still alive. Though I could've sworn that I could overclock it higher before. Maybe the socket got warped. Now that I have a 245KF, I wish I could use the 12700K as my work PC. Does feel a lot faster than any of the PCs that I've used in my office. I would've gone with 9950X3D if AMD had done it like before when they launched the 7950X3D first. Unfortunately, I couldn't wait anymore (winter is the best time for overclocking experiments for me. It's quiet without the sound of airconditioner running).I personally don't trust the 12xxxk series as well
I did say "personally" as I don't have any real evidence against this CPU or below in the Alder lake series.I have tortured my 12700K a lot using Intel XTU. Still alive. Though I could've sworn that I could overclock it higher before. Maybe the socket got warped. Now that I have a 245KF, I wish I could use the 12700K as my work PC. Does feel a lot faster than any of the PCs that I've used in my office. I would've gone with 9950X3D if AMD had done it like before when they launched the 7950X3D first. Unfortunately, I couldn't wait anymore (winter is the best time for overclocking experiments for me. It's quiet without the sound of airconditioner running).
Heck, even Intel 12th gen is far better now! Even the Xeons!
I will be honest, I have one 13700k works OK mean nothing, had 20+ AMD 5x and 7x and now 9x, they had a lot issue, maybe mu luck but 2-3 are semi defected... and yeah its quite hard to prove CPU issue when is just unstable
This topic sadly do not tell me anything, just bashing what who likes more.......
Defo intel gone over the top with 13 and 14gen power use but AMD did same but AMD is now geek temple of love and no one can say anything bad for someone to believe it, I see quite a few post all both side for new CPU and issue, I guess intel could be worst by pure speculation and that is
Rest is FUD
This thread is pages and pages of hard evidence. Intel has acknowledged everything. It has become an expensive problem and the costs are ongoing.I will be honest, I have one 13700k works OK mean nothing, had 20+ AMD 5x and 7x and now 9x, they had a lot issue, maybe mu luck but 2-3 are semi defected... and yeah its quite hard to prove CPU issue when is just unstable
This topic sadly do not tell me anything, just bashing what who likes more.......
The only FUD is coming from you. Any further nonsense will be deleted. Gaslighting and astroturfing do not serve the public interest/help affected users understand the causes of instability and seek remediation, compensation, etc.Rest is FUD
Read this comment from the reddit post:Oh boy! Mike Goldberg - HERE....WE....GO!
https://www.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrace/comments/1ikjnpi/intel_13th14th_gen_update_0x12b_doesnt_seem_to/
Even with power limits or offset undervolting, the VID request could still be above 1.5V at times, even if it was rare. There was a bug with the algorithm, single core boost requesting high amounts of voltage to hit the advertised clockspeed, vendors motherboards doing their own spin on things (usually overvolting to get more performance). Absolute disaster from all fronts and the hardware scene needs to take a step back to prevent anything like that happening ever again (but it won't).
Personally I always tinker with hardware. I go the more efficient approach. I messed with LLC and manual voltage. Ended up going with flatline 1.27V for 5.6Ghz (not the greatest bin but I don't care too much about +100-200Mhz)
Okay, that's fair.The reason I wrote it that way, is the trolls have been pushing back hard lately. Not because I thought it is a new CPU post mitigations that failed. It makes no sense, but they have been downvoting and trolling anyone reporting a broken raptor lake CPU lately. With Intel issuing the mea culpa of sorts and releasing a handful of fixes, it is now simply a matter of record that all 65W and above 13 and 14 gen in use prior to the final fixes, are susceptible to accelerated degradation damage. What the trolls hope to accomplish by denying reality is beyond me. It is a really bad look.
Microcode would not fix broken CPU someone needs to buy a new one for science and torture it for Science and let us know the results one year later for science.How about this
![]()
Indeed, but even if at the end the microcode works, the image of the 13th and 14th gen are beyond repair.Microcode would not fix broken CPU someone needs to buy a new one for science and torture it for Science and let us know the results one year later for science.
12th gen they is fine and there is no issues buying rebranded ADL CPUs as well it is the 8+16 Die causing issues thanks to the guy who forgot to work correctly on clock tree.
I don't think that a sample size of one is going to matter. The comments have some people running their 13th gen CPUs without the microcode update and even factory BIOS and no degradation for them. It seems to be a quality control issue where only a fraction of the CPUs are susceptible to degradation but that fraction could be anywhere from 5 to 50% in a single batch. This is what Intel isn't telling anyone and no one seems to be leaking it from the front lines either.Microcode would not fix broken CPU someone needs to buy a new one for science and torture it for Science and let us know the results one year later for science.
I trust them far less than users having issues. If they do have degradation, they are not going to tell you about it. Amygdala is too big, resulting in feels being too strong.I don't think that a sample size of one is going to matter. The comments have some people running their 13th gen CPUs without the microcode update and even factory BIOS and no degradation for them
What workloads and amount of uptime are involved is what seems to dictate failure. As this latest user noted, all of the manual settings being hailed as how to avoid the issue early on, can and do fail. Minecraft and Path of Titans servers will kill every single raptor from what I've seen. No silicon lottery or conservative board will save them.. It seems to be a quality control issue where only a fraction of the CPUs are susceptible to degradation but that fraction could be anywhere from 5 to 50% in a single batch. This is what Intel isn't telling anyone and no one seems to be leaking it from the front lines either.
Here's a prime example from that thread -
HURR DURR! "How "degrade" only affect UE5 engine and not other apps or BSODs? Maybe problem is UE engine themself?" HERP DERP!
PugetBench... Smells like DellBench to me.PugetBench applied custom settings and they somehow were not affected much it's ridiculous a third party know how to set correct processors settings than major Intel OEMS
Agreed. He is shilling and lying in his own interests.PugetBench... Smells like DellBench to me.
Not even a slight bias, just a huge one. IMO.
See my post earlier in the threadMicrocode would not fix broken CPU someone needs to buy a new one for science and torture it for Science and let us know the results one year later for science.
12th gen they is fine and there is no issues buying rebranded ADL CPUs as well it is the 8+16 Die causing issues thanks to the guy who forgot to work correctly on clock tree.