Originally posted by: tommo123
could we see optical computing (using photons i think), i read something a while back on using DNA for very specific things and bacteria doing calculations. gotta wonder where we'll be in 12 years. if anyone has the cash to seriously push boundaries (as well as have the motivation) it's intel.
Originally posted by: taltamir
Originally posted by: tommo123
could we see optical computing (using photons i think), i read something a while back on using DNA for very specific things and bacteria doing calculations. gotta wonder where we'll be in 12 years. if anyone has the cash to seriously push boundaries (as well as have the motivation) it's intel.
that doesn't make any sense. electricity propegates at C anyways.
Can't blame samsung for trying. People who drop out of high school won't understand why a new technology is great, so it's easier to just lie to them and make things up.Originally posted by: taltamir
reminds me of a clip where a samsung guy explains how organic light emitting diodes produce better pictures because they can produce more "natural" colors because they are "organic"
Originally posted by: Juncar
I laughed when I saw that. The road map looks more like something that the marketing guys came up with. Intel engineers probably face palmed. They already have troubles with MOSFETs at current size, at 4 nm I don't know if its practical at all with silicon based chips.
Originally posted by: TuxDave
Originally posted by: Juncar
I laughed when I saw that. The road map looks more like something that the marketing guys came up with. Intel engineers probably face palmed. They already have troubles with MOSFETs at current size, at 4 nm I don't know if its practical at all with silicon based chips.
Looks like something that someone whipped up with an excel sheet.
45nm
= PREVIOUS * 1/SQRT(2)
= PREVIOUS * 1/SQRT(2)
= PREVIOUS * 1/SQRT(2)
= PREVIOUS * 1/SQRT(2)
= PREVIOUS * 1/SQRT(2)...
I wonder why they stopped. If they only went 8 more years they could've written 1nm transistors!!! wooo
Originally posted by: Idontcare
I fully expect the node labels to continue their iterative cadence but the underlying physical characteristics of the features will take on an effective dimensionality or equivalence.
British researchers have unveiled the world?s smallest transistor, which measures one atom thick and ten atoms across.
The newly announced transistor is more than three times smaller than the 32 nanometer transistors at the cutting edge of silicon-based electronics.
Originally posted by: TuxDave
Originally posted by: Idontcare
I fully expect the node labels to continue their iterative cadence but the underlying physical characteristics of the features will take on an effective dimensionality or equivalence.
I'm kind of hoping they will not actually. (regarding node labels)
Originally posted by: Lemon law
We all know intel, I am looking forward to those 100 GHZ intel chips for $2.00, but if you want the 600GHZ model, its $2000. Lordi, its always hard to keep up with the Jone's.
Originally posted by: geokilla
I thought this Moore's Law ended at 22nm.
Seriously, I'd like to see Intel slow down so AMD can catch up. If they keep on going like this and AMD fails to catch up, Intel will have a monopoly.