I think it is just assembly? The chips are the same chips?
Yes, the reports are that the wafers are from the same fab.
I think it is just assembly? The chips are the same chips?
I haven't heard of any 8 series dual core no HT / Celeron chips.Intel's new naming scheme is terrible. Why are they even making dual cores without SMT anymore!? Dual core with SMT is questionable at this point. If it weren't for AMD dragging them forward, they would still be selling us i7 quad cores until the day I die.
Because they are cheaper and demand for cheap CPUs for offices and whatnot is always high.Intel's new naming scheme is terrible. Why are they even making dual cores without SMT anymore!? Dual core with SMT is questionable at this point. If it weren't for AMD dragging them forward, they would still be selling us i7 quad cores until the day I die.
Intel is just forced to not bring out a too obviously and too superior CPU otherwise they might get problems with the anti trust people.
Yeah but AMD closing down due to not being able to sell anything anymore,which is what would happen with a clearly too superior product,would make intel a monopoly.This is beyond laughable - what color is the sky in your world? Anti-trust laws aren't geared to product superiority, their geared to manufacturer behavior. Having new and super duper superior product isn't breaking any law known to man. Good grief.
Again, it's not against the law to be a monopoly. It's against the law to perform monopolistic behaviors. There's a difference, and that's where Intel's management broke the law in the past.Yeah but AMD closing down due to not being able to sell anything anymore,which is what would happen with a clearly too superior product,would make intel a monopoly.
Long-distance competition was introduced by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) by 1975, ending Ma Bell's monopoly in that area. Meanwhile, a 1974 antitrust lawsuit brought upon by the Department of Justice was finally settled in 1982, forcing Ma Bell to break up her monopoly completely and divest of her local telephone service providers.
The fact of the matter is intel wants amd in business, but barely holding on.That has nothing to do with one business making a superior product to another, and thus dominating marketshare. That article has everything to do with a true monopoly that was government controlled, like your electric company, that was recently deregulated and no longer government owned.
A new Pentium Bronze lineup is in talks too, possibly for Apollo Lake.
And the other fact of the matter is they aren't making any revenue decisions aimed at keeping AMD in business.The fact of the matter is intel wants amd in business, but barely holding on.