Dadofamunky
Platinum Member
- Jan 4, 2005
- 2,184
- 0
- 0
Based on my experience over the last 25 years or so, $1500 is really the cutoff point for a performance PC. When I built my first Pentium box, I spent almost exactly that for a P5-100, a 1GB HD (!!!) and the other trimmings. Same with my old AMD Athlon X2 box. My Wolfale system, in all, cost me roughly the same amount. (I normally don't shoot for high-end graphics - midrange is my typical thing.) Now, at present, my 2500K system has cost the following (including tax):
CPU - $190
HDDs - $120
SSD - $280
DDR3 - $125
Mobo - $145
PSU - $95
Monitor - $240
Case, cooler, inputs - $100
When I buy the GTX 570 I'm planning (for once, a performance video card) the overall cost will be about - $1600.
My point is I don't think the typical performance PC will ever become a cheap commodity item. To get enthusiast-level performance you're always going to have to spend a certain amount, and that number seems to me to be historically about $1.5K. At least since the 486/P5 days, when RAM, disk and CPU prices started dropping pretty dramatically. That ushered in a self-builder golden age, which continues today.
CPU - $190
HDDs - $120
SSD - $280
DDR3 - $125
Mobo - $145
PSU - $95
Monitor - $240
Case, cooler, inputs - $100
When I buy the GTX 570 I'm planning (for once, a performance video card) the overall cost will be about - $1600.
My point is I don't think the typical performance PC will ever become a cheap commodity item. To get enthusiast-level performance you're always going to have to spend a certain amount, and that number seems to me to be historically about $1.5K. At least since the 486/P5 days, when RAM, disk and CPU prices started dropping pretty dramatically. That ushered in a self-builder golden age, which continues today.
