We are eager to learn more soon about this new Intel GPU offering. Intel is expected to reveal more at the OCP Global Summit coming up next week in San Jose.
First things first: Intel emphasized that Xe3 is not based on the Celestial architecture,
I would say 25-30% better perf/watt ISO-process is a significant architectural advancement. It would be nice if in a year they get that again.It was known that Celestial isn't Xe3, it is on Xe3p which is a significant architectural advancement according to Tom Petersen.
For now these are known but they may be used in some more future products as well@mikk
So to recap, how many future Intel products are going to continuing using Xe3 vs Xe3p and beyond? Is Panther Lake going to be the only one?
They are just going to re-use the 4Xe3 IGP tile(Intel 3 node) on some places that probably doesn't warrant a new die for may be cost/economics and other reasons(doesn't need that much iGPU perf or paried with a dGPU).@regen1
Why are they going to use vanilla Xe3 in Nova Lake at all? Is it that Xe3p won't come in 4-core configs?
Wildcat Lake doesn't have Ray Tracing support. So obviously there can be more than just the base die configs. It's their own chip, they could do whatever they want with it.Why are they going to use vanilla Xe3 in Nova Lake at all? Is it that Xe3p won't come in 4-core configs?
In the case of Strix Halo, they're charging $1500+ for the entire kit on the 395+. They'd probably charge $1300 ($200 less as you suggested) if they followed your advice and had a weaker CPU portion of the SoC on a cheaper model. At that point it wouldn't seem worth it to sacrifice the cores + clocks just to save $200.Same with AMD. Why not Strix Halo with full fat GPU but with Ryzen 3 CPU instead and save $200?
I would say 25-30% better perf/watt ISO-process is a significant architectural advancement. It would be nice if in a year they get that again.
@DrMrLordX It looks like Xe3 is just for Pantherlake and Xe3P is for Celestial dGPU. I guess they could use derivatives in future value products.
For now these are known but they may be used in some more future products as well
(Vanilla) Xe3 :
whole PTL line(both 12Xe3 IGPU tile and 4Xe3 IGPU tile),
Wildcat Lake IGPU(2Xe3 units)
4Xe3 tile used in PTL is to be reused in: NVL Desktop and -HX SKUs, SKUs of NVL(4P+0E+4LPE) CPU config and may be also in NVL-H (4P+8E+4LPE) CPU config in a similar fashion to PTL
Xe3P :
12Xe3P iGPU tile in NVL-H(4P+8E+4LPE) CPU config
NVL-AX(Halo): 24Xe3P
Celestial dGPUs
Top GPU config for NVL-AX is 24 Xe3P units AFAIK.Isn't it 16 and 32 Xe3p on NVL-AX?
The fact that the systems are that pricey suggests in reality those CPUs, or at least systems using have to be quite expensive.In the case of Strix Halo, they're charging $1500+ for the entire kit on the 395+. They'd probably charge $1300 ($200 less as you suggested) if they followed your advice and had a weaker CPU portion of the SoC on a cheaper model. At that point it wouldn't seem worth it to sacrifice the cores + clocks just to save $200.
I'm not really buying that until they show it. Xe3 is already substantial at 25-30% ISO. "Bigger upgrade" means the gains will have to be greater than that. Fantastic, but skeptical. Xe3 already has really nice changes like variable register allocation.It sounds to me like Xe3p will be a much bigger upgrade over Xe3 than Xe3 over Xe2.
Ideal for whom? AMD and their partners get to sell 64 or 128GB full fat configs with every 8060s they sell right now. You don't really think they're going to risk that revenue just so people can have fewer CPU cores?A socketed version of Strix Halo at $300 with Ryzen 3 would be ideal.
From the AMD who refuses to give us dual CCD V-cache CPUs yet wastes that precious V-cache die on 6-core CPUs?A socketed version of Strix Halo at $300 with Ryzen 3 would be ideal.
Ideal for who? You are really asking this question? Mind you they got to this perilous position BECAUSE they were run by greedy, disgusting people. If they actually brought something and cared about market and customers, they wouldn't be in this position.Ideal for whom? AMD and their partners get to sell 64 or 128GB full fat configs with every 8060s they sell right now. You don't really think they're going to risk that revenue just so people can have fewer CPU cores?
I think not. Intel is anxious to show the world that they can do stuff better than AMD. Why else would they bet their company on tile strategy despite not having enough experience with it to put out a good enough product with tiles?I have a feeling that Nova-AX will be cancelled
Xe3 looks good. If it wasn't for the Nvidia deal I would be much more positive about the GPU division. The Nvidia deal is antithetical to their GPU plans.I think not. Intel is anxious to show the world that they can do stuff better than AMD. Why else would they bet their company on tile strategy despite not having enough experience with it to put out a good enough product with tiles?
The sheer amount of slides they have created for Panther Lake speaks volumes about their desperation. It's like they were told, THIS IS IT. This thing's gotta sell or we are finished!
Strix Halo would have been cancelled (bc OEMs would not have been interested) if not for AI Hype. Hence all the high memory configs.
I have a feeling that Nova-AX will be cancelled and we'll see if any nVidia products end up being released.
Xe3 looks good. If it wasn't for the Nvidia deal I would be much more positive about the GPU division. The Nvidia deal is antithetical to their GPU plans.
There are very few people in the GPU division. It’s all crickets. The NV deal is smart.They laid off the graphic team and Nvidia joined months later. Not antithetical but very logical.
Photo or it's not true!There are very few people in the GPU division. It’s all crickets.