BK years were very profitable. Please don't tell me they get back to that. That thinking is so bad that I have to think it's intentional? Because that will guarantee the demise and maybe that's what you want.
The dGPU gaming market has so much synergy with iGPUs too. It should NOT be abandoned. Are we that really short term focused? One project fails so give up entirely? Then you
deserve to fail. By sticking through this "storm"(which is an exaggeration), they will learn to be more than in just CPUs.
Seriously, the entire board at intel should be fired.
Product manager all the way to CEO needs to be replaced.
They took a company which was considered a monopoly into a circus fiasco where learning why Raja is called Raja was more important then actually talking about real launch dates.
Sorry but you are wrong. You were right but not anymore.
Brian Kraznich, the CEO that got Intel in this position became CEO in May 2013, meaning he saw the launch of Haswell, Broadwell, and Skylake. So he did a fantastic job right? BK Forever?
NO.
Because a company as big as Intel takes long time to change direction. Those three had influences of Otellini, who despite his serious issues were far better. In fact in late 2014 the 14nm process got delayed 6+ months. And we know the 10nm fiasco.
Firing Pat and current management would be a big, extremely short sighted mistake. Of course they aren't perfect but the new management is the best chance to turn it around. The risks, despite the costs of failures have to be made.
Starting with Intel 4 we will start to see the effects of the new management. In fact they said 2023 server roadmaps are what they are.
Bad management can make every stage worse. But even stellar ones can't make it much better when there are fixed time needed in parts of development.
The bad board members like Andy Bryant are gone. He was a culprit in why we got mediocre and terrible leaders in the company in the past fifteen years.