Which is better?
A 250MB/s drive that last years without any maintenance or worry.
A 500MB/s drive that requires constant firmware updates, always runs a chance for bricking (loss of data), RMA process from OCZ?
The answer is different for different people. Intel will sell lots drives, dont worry about that.![]()
... I guess people buy their (Intel) ssd for reliability & brand name
Exactly, the "mediocre" performance of my G2 gives me absolutely no concerns. I loose no sleep at night worrying that my SS2 might brick. What amazes me is the people who spend endless amounts of time benchmarking their SSD's when, I would bet, that very few people could perceive, at the human level, the difference in performance from one SSD to another in everyday tasks.
Exactly, the "mediocre" performance of my G2 gives me absolutely no concerns. I loose no sleep at night worrying that my SS2 might brick. What amazes me is the people who spend endless amounts of time benchmarking their SSD's when, I would bet, that very few people could perceive, at the human level, the difference in performance from one SSD to another in everyday tasks.
Exactly, the "mediocre" performance of my G2 gives me absolutely no concerns. I loose no sleep at night worrying that my SS2 might brick. What amazes me is the people who spend endless amounts of time benchmarking their SSD's when, I would bet, that very few people could perceive, at the human level, the difference in performance from one SSD to another in everyday tasks.
What I find funny is people who are constantly benchmarking their ssd's and not thinking about all the excessive writing they are doing to them just to brag online.
Exactly, the "mediocre" performance of my G2 gives me absolutely no concerns. I loose no sleep at night worrying that my SS2 might brick. What amazes me is the people who spend endless amounts of time benchmarking their SSD's when, I would bet, that very few people could perceive, at the human level, the difference in performance from one SSD to another in everyday tasks.
I would bet, that very few people could perceive, at the human level, the difference in performance from one SSD to another in everyday tasks.
These discussions remind me a lot of the audiophile discussions in the 1970's that focused on minor improvements in harmonic distortion etc. If I remember correctly the term "specmanship" was popular when describing those that spent a lot of unnecessary money on equipment that had better specs but an indistinguishable sound difference.
aren't those the exact same people who are scared of their ssd dying due to "excessive writing" ? :>