Intel develops and demonstrates wireless electricity

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Eli

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
50,419
8
81
Originally posted by: Baloo
Tesla put far more into developing wireless power transmittal than intel's little experiment, and it was not feasable then, it's not feasable now. Too much wasted power. And a 60 watt bulb uses a lot less energy than a typical laptop, that's just ludicrous to say otherwise. If the human body was not effected by magnetic fields, Magnetic resonance imaging would not work. A bunch of hooey, that is all this is.
My laptop's power adapter is 60W.
 

Leros

Lifer
Jul 11, 2004
21,867
7
81
Nikola Tesla did this over 100 years ago.

I think I saw a device that pulls already existing waves (wifi, radio, etc) out of the air to provide power to low power device.
 

Eli

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
50,419
8
81
Originally posted by: Leros
Nikola Tesla did this over 100 years ago.
Would you people stop saying sh!t like this?

Yes, he did. Yes, the idea is nothing new.

That doesn't change the fact that I can't go to the store and buy wireless power infrastructure. Get it?

 

biggestmuff

Diamond Member
Mar 20, 2001
8,201
2
0
Originally posted by: Baloo
Originally posted by: biggestmuff
Originally posted by: Baloo
Tesla put far more into developing wireless power transmittal than intel's little experiment, and it was not feasable then, it's not feasable now. Too much wasted power. And a 60 watt bulb uses a lot less energy than a typical laptop, that's just ludicrous to say otherwise. If the human body was not effected by magnetic fields, Magnetic resonance imaging would not work. A bunch of hooey, that is all this is.

:confused:

Uh, MRIs work. A body in an MRI tube is unaffected by the magnetic fields.

Yeah, they work, but if the body were not affected by it, the imaging part of it would produce a blank screen. Wow, lack of reading comprehension FTL!

The body is unaffected. The body affects the MRI equipment, thus producing an image.

 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
Originally posted by: Baloo
Originally posted by: biggestmuff
Originally posted by: Baloo
Tesla put far more into developing wireless power transmittal than intel's little experiment, and it was not feasable then, it's not feasable now. Too much wasted power. And a 60 watt bulb uses a lot less energy than a typical laptop, that's just ludicrous to say otherwise. If the human body was not effected by magnetic fields, Magnetic resonance imaging would not work. A bunch of hooey, that is all this is.

:confused:

Uh, MRIs work. A body in an MRI tube is unaffected by the magnetic fields.

Yeah, they work, but if the body were not affected by it, the imaging part of it would produce a blank screen. Wow, lack of reading comprehension FTL!

You are injected with a dye that reacts to it, your body really is unaffected by it.
 

Eli

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
50,419
8
81
Originally posted by: Baloo
Originally posted by: biggestmuff
Originally posted by: Baloo
Tesla put far more into developing wireless power transmittal than intel's little experiment, and it was not feasable then, it's not feasable now. Too much wasted power. And a 60 watt bulb uses a lot less energy than a typical laptop, that's just ludicrous to say otherwise. If the human body was not effected by magnetic fields, Magnetic resonance imaging would not work. A bunch of hooey, that is all this is.

:confused:

Uh, MRIs work. A body in an MRI tube is unaffected by the magnetic fields.

Yeah, they work, but if the body were not affected by it, the imaging part of it would produce a blank screen. Wow, lack of reading comprehension FTL!
Psssst...

It's the other way around. Your body is not affected by the MRI. However, the MRI equipment is affected by your body.
 

Bignate603

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
13,897
1
0
Originally posted by: Baloo
Originally posted by: biggestmuff
Originally posted by: Baloo
Tesla put far more into developing wireless power transmittal than intel's little experiment, and it was not feasable then, it's not feasable now. Too much wasted power. And a 60 watt bulb uses a lot less energy than a typical laptop, that's just ludicrous to say otherwise. If the human body was not effected by magnetic fields, Magnetic resonance imaging would not work. A bunch of hooey, that is all this is.

:confused:

Uh, MRIs work. A body in an MRI tube is unaffected by the magnetic fields.

Yeah, they work, but if the body were not affected by it, the imaging part of it would produce a blank screen. Wow, lack of reading comprehension FTL!

The use MRI technology to look at single molecules to figure out their structure without changing them. If they can do this to single molecules please explain to me how it will affect you?

Also, my monster 17 inch laptop has a 72 watt power brick and that's enough to both power it and charge its battery. I'm sure a smaller laptop can be well under 60 watts, especially if you aren't charging the battery.
 

thomsbrain

Lifer
Dec 4, 2001
18,148
1
0
My Sonicare toothbrush does the exact same thing (wireless charging) and no one gets their nerd panties in a twist over that. Granted, it's a tiny current and the distance is a matter of millimeters, but this isn't a new concept.

I kinda have to wonder what blasting that strong of a magnetic field around is going to do to people's watches, CRT monitors, people's pant zippers, etc. Not to mention they are talking about beaming power to laptops... uh... HARD DRIVE? I don't buy the bunk about them causing cancer or any of that, but speakers are magnetically shielded for a reason; there are multiple devices around every person's home that are damaged by strong magnetic fields.