I wouldn't believe him even if he said he was Ryan Shrout.So Ryan Shrout has posted a video of Tiger Lake notebook running BFV at high preset at around 30FPS~ on the integrated Xe graphics.
And this adds to the thread how?I wouldn't believe him even if he said he was Ryan Shrout.
I'm sorry for not writing an essay about it at first, but here it goes: by all accounts TGL seems to be a beast, but the moment this guy starts to talk about it out if nowhere, it makes me nervous and think there's something not going as planned.And this adds to the thread how?
i think someone commented on twitter that FRAPS only in DX11?Thought I'd post my own experience with my 8300H + 1050 laptop... but while it performs about the same as Renoir in this game for averages (and this is with dedicated memory and the GPU hitting 1800mhz in game!) the frametimes are beyond poor. Consistent stuttering would be putting it lightly.
So unfortunatly, this isn't quite the game for a comparison vs MX or the mobile GTX1050... but looking at it differently it's a verys trong first showing for Tiger Lake.
Though I'm surprised by the use of DX11 over DX12 - the DX12 implementation of BFV (after many updates) runs smoother on most hardware now than the DX11 version.
11th Gen Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Yeah but MSi Afterburner and CapFrameX both exist and let you use fancy other tools like frame-time plots!i think someone commented on twitter that FRAPS only in DX11?
Another comparison point - the single best 1T 10900K result is a score of 162.Dell Inspiron 7506 2n1 :
Dell Inspiron 7506 2n1 Performance Results - UserBenchmark
www.userbenchmark.com
1 core 173
The very best I7-1065G7 Icelake based devices can reach 148-150.
For all we know it could just be their DX12 driver isn't quite where they want it to be yet.
You weren't very optimistic about numbers improving this much, though heheYea, finally the graphics performance is close to where it should be. Took them a while.
You weren't very optimistic about numbers improving this much, though hehe
seems like a 70% uplift over icelake G7. nice
my 4700u 15gb 3200ddr4 is currently in transit, so if no one does it i might be able to do it in a few daysSomeone testing a 4800U or whatever on the same campaign at 25w would be handy.
Adored tested a 4900H and got 25fps AVG.
my 4700u 15gb 3200ddr4 is currently in transit, so if no one does it i might be able to do it in a few days
NBC did the test with their Swift 3 using LPDDR4X. They said it gets 21 fps.
If you look here, the 4900HS is 20-30% faster than the 4700U with LPDDR4-4266: https://www.ultrabookreview.com/38004-amd-vega-7-8-mx350-benchmarks/
Yea that would be interesting for sure.
How much could those willow Cove Cores be tipping the scales? ....
It's reasonable to expect that Golden Cove might have the same % jump over Willow Cove as Sunny Cove had over Skylake - so I assume around 18-20% is to be expected. The problem for intel is that AMD is not standing still at all, Zen3 is supposed to have major IPC uplift over Zen2(~>20% rumored) and Zen4 will bring another round of IPC jump over Zen3 - probably in the range of Zen+ to Zen2, which is ~15%.Still largely unknown by this point, but most early indicators from leaks and rumours point to Willow Cove having ~7% IPC increase over Sunny Cove, which would mean a ~25% increase over Skylake.
Golden Cove looks to be the one where things will get interesting. The Intel road map from the Architecture day in late 2018 mentioned the term "Strong IPC gain", and also had the following image:
View attachment 23523
Looks like there's good evidence for the TGL-U chips hitting boost speeds of ~4.6-4.7 GHz. Given that, I don't think that 5 GHz is unlikely on their third(?) iteration of the 10 nm process next year, especially for desktop chips at higher TDPs. Although I am not sure about the power consumption, but it should be somewhat more efficient than the 14nm process.5 GHz on Intel 10nm in 2021? Why do I not see that happening?
If the recent leaks on TGL are true, 5Ghz is in the cards for 2021.5 GHz on Intel 10nm in 2021? Why do I not see that happening?