Originally posted by: Fox5
Originally posted by: Intelia
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
The sadder thing is supposedly this Troll's husband supports them by building AMD systems for customers. Can you say biting the hand that feeds them? LMAO
Don't ever ever confuse loyality to honesty . My husband is a better man than you well every be . When some one calls and ask for the very best gaming pc available David has to give them an AMD64 . He does't like amd at all but he really doesn't like Intel P4P even more. You should see some of the E-mails he has sent Intel over the P4P . The 1 I liked best was when he asked intel for a top engineering job because he said he could easily do better than the P4P. David has no formal education so I really found that one amusing
I certainly hope you have even less of an education than him, because your posts are borderline unreadable. If he's less educated, I'd imagine he's only communicating with cavemen.
Well you know I have made bad post . As I am sure many have but I have never seen anyone stand up to David in real life. He just called the police to sign a complaint against you. He also just smashed a brand new LCD for the computer he has been working on all night. I pray to GOD he doesn't get any personnal information on you threw the police .
Yeah, this isn't helping the neanderthal image.
And not only does you English suck, but so does your ability to make an effective argument. You completely make up stories without any actual basis in reality, and for some reason seem to think you know better than Intel, and better than Microsoft. And I don't know where you get the idea that Intel and Microsoft aren't on good terms, sure they may have used AMD's x86-64, which was just a minor upgrade to Intel's x86 anyhow, but they waited until Intel released its x86-64 chips before releasing Windows x86-64.
Oh, and don't get your hopes up of Apple supporting Itanium, they're not going to transition to yet another architecture so soon. They will go x86 in the short term, and x86-64 in the long term, for them to force another complete hardware change after dumping PowerPC would hurt them badly.
Maybe someday Intel will make an Itanium chip with an x86 core as well for backwards compatibility...but if they were going to do this(assuming it's even possible), would they be so gungho about multi core x86? Now would be the time to make a major change to the programming model, once x86 is entrenched in multicore suggesting a switch to Itanium would be as insane as it was a few years ago.
BTW, I'd like to see a Xeon chip with as much cache as Itanium, though a proper dual core Xeon may prove to be a better chip than Itanium anyway, performance in many cases is already very close.