Intel& Apple whats going on

Intelia

Banned
May 12, 2005
832
0
0
Hi all ! Even though this article is based on speculation. It is very close to what I said in the other Intel Apple Thread
http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20050609.html

I am also tring to find another article that I read that Intel is going to bring charges against AMD & Microsoft for a conspricey. That Microsoft and AMD conspired against Intel and the true 64 bit processor Itanic. Microsoft saying there was no need for 64 bit processors on the desktop. While helping AMD create X86 64 bit processor. There is a lot of documentaion that supports this.

IN just 3 short years AMD cpu's will be running X86 64 bit extensions and the only big customer Microsoft will have.
Intel on the other hand is getting ready to bring true 64 bit tech. to the desk top. with an Apple O/S and also will be able to run windows but only at the same speed as now.(windows only will have same speed as present .Apple OS will be about 3x faster.Apples OS well be Intel only.)
SO its going to be Intel (THE giant) and Apple the (Little guy) vs. Microsoft( the giant)and AMD the(little guy)!

So this really is shaping up to be great for Intel . Why do I say great for Intel?

1) Intel created X86 O/S so there cpu's can use them. Intel also created the True 64 bit platform on the Itanic. ( Know way is Intel going to give AMD rights to use this platform .) AMD 64 bit X86 only!!!

2) Apples O/S is better than Microsofts

3 ) Even though AMD cpu's well beable to run on this OS but not nearly as well as the Intel CPU it is created for. I have heard just rumors that Intel has said Amd's well be able to run at 1/3 the speed of the Intel cpu on the apple o/s.
I find this really amusing because thats the exact pertanage the the Microsoft 64 bit O/S for the Itanic reduced its speed by 2/3. Its not good to anger Intel the monopolist LOL. How can you be a monoply when no one else can supply enough cpu's(another well known fact) Intel creates X86 platform Microsoft writes code for it everyones in love .(this was the 70's 80'S when love wasn't a 4 letter word. Amd is born Intel says go head use your platform. (true love)
Microsoft grows into this hugh 2,000 grilla. Intel grows into 2,000 grilla. Apple"s Steve Jobs is casterated by Bill Gates, Amd is happy creating cpu's for the value market. Everyone is happy and in love (except Steve Jobs who can't get going anymore and eventually is removed from his own company)

Fast forward a few years Intel has a dream 64 bit processing . So they created the chip that microsoft has tried to sink. THE ITANIC !!!! So Intel gets there dream Chip done .They go to Microsoft for O/S Bill says no need for 64 bit on desk top. But Microsoft does put out an O/S for the Itanic but it will only run at 1/3 the speed that the cpu is capable of. That would be equal to a AMD 64 3200. (thats 1 hell of a speed penalty)

SO now Intel no longer loves microsoft. In the mean time Bill goes and finds Steve and says here let me give you a hand up and helps him back into the Apple's drivers seat. ( Steve had to be looking for another low blow)

On another front Bill is busy helping AMD develop X86 64 bit processor . Amd comes out with it and wants to be declared the world champion of CPU tech (thats really is funny). Intel takes a beating for 2 whole years. The cool part is Intel not even mad at AMD yet.(Intel got caught sleeping ,whats fair is fair.) The part Intel didn't understand
than or now is why AMD would really want to challenge Intel. (Since AMD can't even come close to producing 30% of the market for CPU'S)

I have heard much talk about Intel beating up on poor AMD . The fact is Intel didn't have to let AMD use the X86 platform thats 1 more fact.
So what does AMD do they team up with IBM and microsoft to create the P4 stomper known as AMD64( Still Intels not real angry with AMD)

This paragraph I well leave pretty empty cause the next thing that happened I am not sure about .It would only be a guess but I think that Xbox and PS3 O/S and IBM relationship with AMD really pissed Intel off.

I do know what happens next . Intel pulls in all chiefs they sit down they go over everthing that they can talk about on what happened with there X86 platform and more importantly the Itanic true 64 bit arch.

I would have loved to heard that conversation! Is what Intel came up with in that meeting is going to change computing. The first thing they all agree on is AMD slipped 1 by them but Intel needs AMD or DO THEY?One man had an idea that was quickly rejected by the board. After 3 months the board gets back together to try to put together a plan. Paul wants the Idea that was rejected 3 months earlier put back on the table. After some discussion its agreed that the ideal has merit. More meeting over the next few months and the plan is put in place.

What was the rejected plan than Paul revived. At that meeting there was much talk of the Itanic (the CHIP THAT WON"T SINK) and why microsoft won't create a legit O/S for it.
One board member makes a statement that he hates Bill Gates and microsoft. Another member of the board says ya you do but not as much as Steve Jobs does!!
A third member says Apple has a true 64 bit O/S that can be developed to run our Itanics at Full speed (That would equal AMD64 9600)

So that gets us to were we are today. By the year 2008 Intel will abandone X86 platform for true 64 bit processing and still be capable of running Microsoft O/S but at 1/3 the speed its capable of running. Intel basicily will give AMD x86 platform but not there new true 64 bit platform (Itanic) Amd bit the hand that fed them . Intel is laughing at the monoply charges because by the time it gets to court Intel well be leaving the platform there suppose to have a monoply on. A platform that Intel created. (So how will AMD supply all those CPU'S they won't be able to.( LOL) SO now there's a 70% x86 processor shortage what do we do? WE buy Intel apple machines because the AMD microsoft machines are in very short supply. ( I heard the thing that really got Intel angry at AMd. Is that AMD is helping China to create super computers that can be used against Americans . AMD just don't know who there friends are . But than again look at there CEO!!!!!

So intel will get its Itanic o/s that runs at full speed. Amd will have X86 64 that they can share with microsoft.

Steve Jobs gets to perform surgery on Bill Gates(take the whole thing Stevey) Intel gets revenge on IBM over the gaming consols and also tells AMD here you wanted the x86 platform here here its yours we hope your happy with it.( Even if the 64 bit O/S doesn't come. Apple well optimize for Intel only thats a fact.) Intel tells there good buddies at Dell Apple O/S or nothing .(microsoft sues apple for a monoply LOL)

Well now I have to wait 3 whole years to find out how close I got it.

Thank God Conroe well get here first!!! (lol)

 

Mattd46612

Senior member
Jan 23, 2005
670
0
0
phewwww just got done. Not a chance at any of that. Windows has such a lock on the public. The masses will follow Windows whereever it will lead. Which if the rest of your story is true will only turn the tables and make AMD #1 and Intel in the dust.
 

Duvie

Elite Member
Feb 5, 2001
16,215
0
71
Basically a bunch of crap like most of your post INtelia...So much ASSuming and speculation along with the normal Intel troll bibble about Intel marketing BS.....

The thought of microsoft conspiring with AMD with 64bit back well before the apple intel joint venture is nearly one of the most stupid fvcking things I have ever heard. Why would they have done that with the 20% or less marketshare leader....That would have all but forced Intel to Apple and Bill would never had done that.
 

BitByBit

Senior member
Jan 2, 2005
474
2
81
Much of that was sheer fantasy, or atleast tainted speculation.
Intelia: Do you get paid by Intel to submit these kinds of posts?
 

Intelia

Banned
May 12, 2005
832
0
0
Originally posted by: Mattd46612
phewwww just got done. Not a chance at any of that. Windows has such a lock on the public. The masses will follow Windows whereever it will lead. Which if the rest of your story is true will only turn the tables and make AMD #1 and Intel in the dust.

Absolutly true except for 1 thing there is only 1 chip maker who can supply 100% of the total cpu demand its not AMD. Intel and Apple will sell at least 50% of the market by default . I don't know if you ever used apple O/S there differant but once you learn it its much better tham XP exspecially in the stability department . All so most of the market well follow the Hardware not the software. You cut Microsoft down to size and much will change . Microsofts greatest achievement vapor ware. I agree with Intel 100% that microsoft a software firm has to much imput as to what hardware we use . Let us not forget Intel will still run On microsoft O/S but they well push the Apple cart before they well vaporware(I mean Microsoft). Here,s another interesting Link

http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/5972/

 

Intelia

Banned
May 12, 2005
832
0
0
Originally posted by: Duvie
Basically a bunch of crap like most of your post INtelia...So much ASSuming and speculation along with the normal Intel troll bibble about Intel marketing BS.....

The thought of microsoft conspiring with AMD with 64bit back well before the apple intel joint venture is nearly one of the most stupid fvcking things I have ever heard. Why would they have done that with the 20% or less marketshare leader....That would have all but forced Intel to Apple and Bill would never had done that.

Read a little closer troll .The conspiracy started After Itanic was created and Gates refused to create an exceptable O/S for the Itanic the one that microsoft created ran at 1/3 the speed that Itanic could run . Than after IBM AMD and Microsoft all worked together to create AMD 64. THAN AND ONLY than does Apple enter into the picture as stated above .
 

Duvie

Elite Member
Feb 5, 2001
16,215
0
71
Originally posted by: Intelia
Originally posted by: Duvie
Basically a bunch of crap like most of your post INtelia...So much ASSuming and speculation along with the normal Intel troll bibble about Intel marketing BS.....

The thought of microsoft conspiring with AMD with 64bit back well before the apple intel joint venture is nearly one of the most stupid fvcking things I have ever heard. Why would they have done that with the 20% or less marketshare leader....That would have all but forced Intel to Apple and Bill would never had done that.

Read a little closer troll .The conspiracy started After Itanic was created and Gates refused to create an exceptable O/S for the Itanic the one that microsoft created ran at 1/3 the speed that Itanic could run . Than after IBM AMD and Microsoft all worked together to create AMD 64. THAN AND ONLY than does Apple enter into the picture as stated above .



LOL!! You liar...I have been onto your lying crap for months....

I dont post flame threads with wild speculations...I try to stay closer to fact....

I personally dont trust any user with the name of the company they seem to defend non stop....


Hey Unintelia!!! You want to have a vote off for who is the biggest troll with the loser volunteering to take a vacation???
 

Vegitto

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
5,234
1
0
Intelia: For the last fvcking time, it's Itanium, not Itanic.

In other news: Troll post, ignored.
 

Duvie

Elite Member
Feb 5, 2001
16,215
0
71
Actually the funny thing is Itanic is the derogatory term created by technophiles to explin Itaniums first round of succes....Itanic like Titanic...Idiot!!!
 

AnandThenMan

Diamond Member
Nov 11, 2004
3,991
627
126
Intelia you're a crack head an an idiot if you actually believe the utter drivel you posted. Holy crap that has got to be the worst fanboy sh*t I have ever read in my life.
 

Intelia

Banned
May 12, 2005
832
0
0
Originally posted by: Vegitto
Intelia: For the last fvcking time, it's Itanium, not Itanic.

In other news: Troll post, ignored.

Know way Itanic sticks it was AMD fanboys that named the doomed chip lets see if she sinks. I think not! Itanic stays for all time.

( Titanic unsinkable ship!! Itanic the chip that just won't go down !! Intel backed away from P4P and netburst it won't happen to the Itanic.)
 

clarkey01

Diamond Member
Feb 4, 2004
3,419
1
0
Originally posted by: Intelia
Originally posted by: Mattd46612
phewwww just got done. Not a chance at any of that. Windows has such a lock on the public. The masses will follow Windows whereever it will lead. Which if the rest of your story is true will only turn the tables and make AMD #1 and Intel in the dust.

Absolutly true except for 1 thing there is only 1 chip maker who can supply 100% of the total cpu demand its not AMD. Intel and Apple will sell at least 50% of the market by default . I don't know if you ever used apple O/S there differant but once you learn it its much better tham XP exspecially in the stability department . All so most of the market well follow the Hardware not the software. You cut Microsoft down to size and much will change . Microsofts greatest achievement vapor ware. I agree with Intel 100% that microsoft a software firm has to much imput as to what hardware we use . Let us not forget Intel will still run On microsoft O/S but they well push the Apple cart before they well vaporware(I mean Microsoft). Here,s another interesting Link

http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/5972/

Apple has 2% of the market...And using Intel chips wont do too much for them. Your just going off hype. You have to look deeper and understand why there using Intel chips and why IBM isnt arsed. Itanium was spose to take over the world and has failed, it was branded the X86 killer and well... Opteron has outsold it by quite a bit. It's missed projections and development has been pushed back and cut down, not to mention it was late by several years too.

Im not saying Itanium doesnt have it uses, of course it does, but it's not or never will be the knock out punch to AMD and the X86 world.
 

clarkey01

Diamond Member
Feb 4, 2004
3,419
1
0
Originally posted by: Intelia
Originally posted by: Vegitto
Intelia: For the last fvcking time, it's Itanium, not Itanic.

In other news: Troll post, ignored.

Know way Itanic sticks it was AMD fanboys that named the doomed chip lets see if she sinks. I think not! Itanic stays for all time.

( Titanic unsinkable ship!! Itanic the chip that just won't go down !! Intel backed away from P4P and netburst it won't happen to the Itanic.)

Can you even tell me Itanium's strong points ?

Why im not happy with it.

1. It was late by serval years
2. It didnt kill the X86 world
3. COST
4. Poor emulation
5. X86 continues to grow
6. Development has been scaled way back
7. AMD sells more semprons I bet then this "X86" killer. It's a fact that Opteron has outsold Intaium by a factor of 10 and that was a year ago.

8. Xeon's outsell it by about oh, 300%.
 

Mik3y

Banned
Mar 2, 2004
7,089
0
0
Originally posted by: Intelia
Originally posted by: Vegitto
Intelia: For the last fvcking time, it's Itanium, not Itanic.

In other news: Troll post, ignored.

Know way Itanic sticks it was AMD fanboys that named the doomed chip lets see if she sinks. I think not! Itanic stays for all time.

( Titanic unsinkable ship!! Itanic the chip that just won't go down !! Intel backed away from P4P and netburst it won't happen to the Itanic.)

funny how the titanic DID sink. As for the "itanic", its no wonder its a failure. if you dont believe me, do some research. called a failure for terrible price to performance to lack of necessity. intel admitted to losing money on it.
 

Intelia

Banned
May 12, 2005
832
0
0
Originally posted by: AnandThenMan
Intelia you're a crack head an an idiot if you actually believe the utter drivel you posted. Holy crap that has got to be the worst fanboy sh*t I have ever read in my life.

Actualy everthing that happened in the past is very close to the actually documented facts . The future stuff all speculation. But I am betting women and life has taught me 1 undenyable fact . WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND> Steve Jobs GETS Billy the thief back> Intel beats AMD up just to get to IBM. Xbox and PS3 have very short time that they well beable to overpower the PC platform . Thanks mostly To PPU and the fact that Intel is really angry.

2 short months ago everyone was saying that nvidia's NF4 chipset was superior to Intels product. 1 problems over the hacks that wrote these articles they compared to the wrong intel chipset. 925 was used not the 955 that stomped it into the ground . So all these smart hacks new absolutly nothing.

One more thing you amd trolls are always resorting to name calling . Instead of doing that . Go to the roadmaps pickout a future cpu and speculate as to what it can achive. I personnelly have looked hard at the AMD roadmaps there is nothing there.

By the way there are a lot of AMD fans out there that for some reason believe AMD invented the ondie memory controller now thats funny . AMD people really are very silly!!
As we grow closer and closer to yonah the Intel AMDPS squad is going to hit this forum hard . There are over 300 members now and growing really fast. THATS right over 300 zinnites and growing.


 

RichUK

Lifer
Feb 14, 2005
10,341
678
126
why is everyone SHOUTING !!!!

what quote is that from ;)


anyways i think that is old news .. "i think" couldnt be bothered to read it all :D
 

Vegitto

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
5,234
1
0
Originally posted by: Duvie
Actually the funny thing is Itanic is the derogatory term created by technophiles to explin Itaniums first round of succes....Itanic like Titanic...Idiot!!!

@ Duvie: Was that '...Idiot!!!' towards me or towards somebody else?

@ Intelia: Read this and this.

@ Everyone: Please, don't reply to this thread anymore. It'll feed the trolls.
 

Intelia

Banned
May 12, 2005
832
0
0
Originally posted by: clarkey01
Originally posted by: Intelia
Originally posted by: Vegitto
Intelia: For the last fvcking time, it's Itanium, not Itanic.

In other news: Troll post, ignored.

Know way Itanic sticks it was AMD fanboys that named the doomed chip lets see if she sinks. I think not! Itanic stays for all time.

( Titanic unsinkable ship!! Itanic the chip that just won't go down !! Intel backed away from P4P and netburst it won't happen to the Itanic.)

Can you even tell me Itanium's strong points ?

Why im not happy with it.

1. It was late by serval years
2. It didnt kill the X86 world
3. COST
4. Poor emulation
5. X86 continues to grow
6. Development has been scaled way back
7. AMD sells more semprons I bet then this "X86" killer. It's a fact that Opteron has outsold Intaium by a factor of 10 and that was a year ago.

8. Xeon's outsell it by about oh, 300%.[/q

Actually your half right . it was late and if there ever was a processor that should have been late this is it.
Why didn't it kill intels own x86 platform . Why aren't there more AMD64 bit apps out . the cpu has been out 2 years.
1) software companies aren't rushing to wright apps for it why?The ones that have been writen show little if no speed gain many are infact slower. There's your x86 64 bit extensions. If the reasoning behind the x86 64 bit extensions is just so M/B can handle more memory there are now better solutions on the market .

2) It has been shown and if you are really interested the apps that run on Itanics that are properlly written run reaaly well . Itanic is not positioned as a top of the line server cpu because thats what intel wanted its what microsoft wanted.
If you compare the $$$$$ 0f the just released FX 57 $1000 and the cheapest Itanic $1200 Intel is working extremely hard to bring the price of this down.I believe they got aways to go but there doing a good job . As for the true power of a 1.5 GHz Itanic it makes the Dothan chip look sick and A Dothan at 2.82 is just breath taking.

Now Intel has to play with the Yonah Merom Conroe but only until Apple finishes its well publicized 64 bit O/S that has dropped out of site.(Actually it dropped right into Intels lap. OS X runs fine on Intel's today. The Apple O/S that is 18 months away is due to arrive at exactly the same time that Intel CSI well be released and Intels common platform well become a reality shortly afterwards


quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: Intelia

quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: Vegitto
Intelia: For the last fvcking time, it's Itanium, not Itanic.

In other news: Troll post, ignored.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Know way Itanic sticks it was AMD fanboys that named the doomed chip lets see if she sinks. I think not! Itanic stays for all time.

( Titanic unsinkable ship!! Itanic the chip that just won't go down !! Intel backed away from P4P and netburst it won't happen to the Itanic.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



funny how the titanic DID sink. As for the "itanic", its no wonder its a failure. if you dont believe me, do some research. called a failure for terrible price to performance to lack of necessity. intel admitted to losing money on it.

If you would read the information that you have talked about here. Its very understandable about price performance . If you read very carefully you will see that if Microsoft would have written true 64 bit code for Itanic it would be 3X faster than it is right now. This is not wild spectualations! These are facts that can be found all over the web.
 

cbehnken

Golden Member
Aug 23, 2004
1,402
0
0
Originally posted by: Intelia
Originally posted by: clarkey01
Originally posted by: Intelia
Originally posted by: Vegitto
Intelia: For the last fvcking time, it's Itanium, not Itanic.

In other news: Troll post, ignored.

Know way Itanic sticks it was AMD fanboys that named the doomed chip lets see if she sinks. I think not! Itanic stays for all time.

( Titanic unsinkable ship!! Itanic the chip that just won't go down !! Intel backed away from P4P and netburst it won't happen to the Itanic.)

Can you even tell me Itanium's strong points ?

Why im not happy with it.

1. It was late by serval years
2. It didnt kill the X86 world
3. COST
4. Poor emulation
5. X86 continues to grow
6. Development has been scaled way back
7. AMD sells more semprons I bet then this "X86" killer. It's a fact that Opteron has outsold Intaium by a factor of 10 and that was a year ago.

8. Xeon's outsell it by about oh, 300%.[/q

Actually your half right . it was late and if there ever was a processor that should have been late this is it.
Why didn't it kill intels own x86 platform . Why aren't there more AMD64 bit apps out . the cpu has been out 2 years.
1) software companies aren't rushing to wright apps for it why?The ones that have been writen show little if no speed gain many are infact slower. There's your x86 64 bit extensions. If the reasoning behind the x86 64 bit extensions is just so M/B can handle more memory there are now better solutions on the market .

2) It has been shown and if you are really interested the apps that run on Itanics that are properlly written run reaaly well . Itanic is not positioned as a top of the line server cpu because thats what intel wanted its what microsoft wanted.
If you compare the $$$$$ 0f the just released FX 57 $1000 and the cheapest Itanic $1200 Intel is working extremely hard to bring the price of this down.I believe they got aways to go but there doing a good job . As for the true power of a 1.5 GHz Itanic it makes the Dothan chip look sick and A Dothan at 2.82 is just breath taking.

Now Intel has to play with the Yonah Merom Conroe but only until Apple finishes its well publicized 64 bit O/S that has dropped out of site.(Actually it dropped right into Intels lap. OS X runs fine on Intel's today. The Apple O/S that is 18 months away is due to arrive at exactly the same time that Intel CSI well be released and Intels common platform well become a reality shortly afterwards

Congratulations, you just beat Dothan for the stupidest post ever. Please educate yourself before you post again.
 

Intelia

Banned
May 12, 2005
832
0
0
Originally posted by: Vegitto
Originally posted by: Duvie
Actually the funny thing is Itanic is the derogatory term created by technophiles to explin Itaniums first round of succes....Itanic like Titanic...Idiot!!!

@ Duvie: Was that '...Idiot!!!' towards me or towards somebody else?

@ Intelia: Read this and this.

@ Everyone: Please, don't reply to this thread anymore. It'll feed the trolls.

I went Here and Igot to the Titanic/ read the history books . read the book and seen the movie. Than I went here and found old news about very bad cache that has been fixed.since the first Itanic release. Emulations what exactly is the importance here . Rest assurred I know. Its what I been talking about. This is what Intel is going to get from Apple emulations that actually work at full speed . You want to see links that show the Itanic to be 3x faster than P43.2C. But when run on windows 64 bit O/S with really bad emulations runs at the same speed as a P4 3.2 C. Microsoft is tring to stick it to Intel thats a fact . Now Intel is going after Microsoft and to be perfectly honest I don,t care who wins. I just believe Intel is right and microsoft sucks

If Bill Gates was standing infront of me and there weren't a lot of people around. I would walk right up to him and bit-ch slap the whimp around
 

Vegitto

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
5,234
1
0
Originally posted by: Intelia
Originally posted by: Vegitto
Originally posted by: Duvie
Actually the funny thing is Itanic is the derogatory term created by technophiles to explin Itaniums first round of succes....Itanic like Titanic...Idiot!!!

@ Duvie: Was that '...Idiot!!!' towards me or towards somebody else?

@ Intelia: Read this and this.

@ Everyone: Please, don't reply to this thread anymore. It'll feed the trolls.

I went Here and Igot to the Titanic/ read the history books . read the book and seen the movie. Than I went here and found old news about very bad cache that has been fixed.since the first Itanic release. Emulations what exactly is the importance here . Rest assurred I know. Its what I been talking about. This is what Intel is going to get from Apple emulations that actually work at full speed . You want to see links that show the Itanic to be 3x faster than P43.2C. But when run on windows 64 bit O/S with really bad emulations runs at the same speed as a P4 3.2 C. Microsoft is tring to stick it to Intel thats a fact . Now Intel is going after Microsoft and to be perfectly honest I don,t care who wins. I just believe Intel is right and microsoft sucks

If Bill Gates was standing infront of me and there weren't a lot of people around. I would walk right up to him a bit-ch slap the whimp around


Can't argue with that. That's the most truthful thing you have ever written on these forums. Good job!

Troll post, ignored.
 

natto fire

Diamond Member
Jan 4, 2000
7,117
10
76
So wait, are you an Intel fanboi? I am getting mixed signals from your obvious fanboism post. Yet you made such a great nickname for Intel's 64 bit 'solution' (Itanium, which should be written to the history books. And Titanic, a grandiose ship which is in said history books)

Either way, I think Duvie is on the right track in calling all this BS out. (yet again)

edit: ok, finished reading the rest of this thread and just had to quote this drivel.
Originally posted by: Intelfanboi( Titanic unsinkable ship!! Itanic the chip that just won't go down !! Intel backed away from P4P and netburst it won't happen to the Itanic.)

You might want to use google to find out what happened to the 'unsinkable ship'. I guess the same can be said for your fairy-tale CPU. Why don't you just go ahead and bookmark and cache this thread locally for reference in the future. Perhaps you will learn a lesson to not believe wild speculations you read on the internet. Perhaps you will listen when MULTIPLE people tell you how unlikely and ridiculous something is. Or, perhaps this new and incdreidible arch/chip will materialize (unlikely) and you can gloat. Either way someone will learn SOMETHING. (Ideally it will be you, and anyone else who believes everything they read on the internet. I am aware of the coincidence that you are now reading this on the internet,but I never said you had to believe a damn word I have said)

Should I do it?

I think I am going to...



Cliff's notes, for the edit :p
1.Intelia is a funny username, that in no way reminds me of Intel inc., a microprocessor manufacturer. /avg. sarcasm thickness: 8 of 11

2. This thread should be cached by someone, for later reference. I did notice on Apple's website that they will be using only Intel CPUs by the end of 2007, not that they are stealing much business from IBM, lol.

3. We should all learn something every day

4. Profit :D