I have never ? who is in the drivers sit at the moment or We wouldn't be selling AMD 64's. This thread again is about future intel cpu's no need to talk AMD in this thread.
Um ... you've been screaming DOTHANS RULE TEH WORLD this entire thread (well, 3 pages of it). And of course there's a need to talk of AMD, they are what the conroe will be up against, so it only makes sense to compare them.
I've pretty much had enough of this thread, though. You clearly are not capable of carrying on an unbiased conversation.
I've pretty much had enough of this thread, though. You clearly are not capable of carrying on an unbiased conversation.
Yeha well in the future people are gonna live on the moon. Robots will go to work for us. Oh, and politicians won't lie.
What a happy universe it's gonna be.
What a happy universe it's gonna be.
OMG... we can talk about whatever we want as long as it relates to the topic at hand. It seems to me that whenever conversations start going off badly for your dear Intel you always try to make everyone shut up about AMD. If we hadnt talked about AMD the thread would have looked something like this:
/endthread
Not the most interesting thread... Of course you'd probably keep replying instead of letting the thread die.
Dadofamunky
Platinum Member
- Jan 4, 2005
- 2,184
- 0
- 0
CPU-Z is not a benchmark, nor does it indicate a stable system. That is zero-content info.
That said, if I was building another system I believe I'd give a Micro-ATX system a go with a Dothan chip. But I'm very happy with what I have.
Dadofamunky
Platinum Member
- Jan 4, 2005
- 2,184
- 0
- 0
And you're not an Intel fanboi? Oh, that's right, a fanperson.
Have you personally verified that? Oh, never mind, can't argue with a content-free mind....
GuitarDaddy
Lifer
- Nov 9, 2004
- 11,465
- 1
- 0
I'm developing a CPU in my garage thats the size of a nickel and runs at 10ghz and uses no electricity, that right 0 watts. It is powered by a self contained internal source.
But I'm having trouble finding a stable supplier or CPU grade kryptonite.
But I'm having trouble finding a stable supplier or CPU grade kryptonite.
Not true I used my husbands Dothan as an example of the very good performance we can expect from the cpu's this thread is about and one thing lead to another
Aquila76
Diamond Member
While I'm looking forward to ACTUAL TESTS of the Intel CPU's, I'm not holding my breath. Even if it does all that Intel(ia) claims (which if that happens, a certain leader of the demons best break out the thermal undies) what's the PRICE/(performance/watt) ratio gonna be compared to whatever AMD unleashes?
Side Note: My last Intel PC was a P3 933 Cu CPU. It still runs as my 'play with it until it breaks' box for Linux \ Exchange \ Active Directory. Best CPU for Win98SE so I can play all the old games, too.
After reading through this whole thread and the numerous assinine ramblings, let me say this:
INTELIA, YOU DO NOT BELONG ON THE INTERNET, ESPECIALLY IN A TECH FORUM! GET BACK IN THE KITCHEN AND MAKE ME SOME PIE!
Certainly intel's credibility is not the best, I wouldn't believe a word to intel, they said Netburst was a wonderful architechure, but they are wasting it, o why, why, why.?
Avalon
Diamond Member
- Jul 16, 2001
- 7,571
- 178
- 106
PERFORMANCE PER WATT != PERFORMANCE
How can you take this, Soviet's post directly above, and say what you're saying at the top of my post? He just said it was 5x better performance per watt, and then you go and tell him that he's WRONG, and that it is 5x performance per watt. That's what he's been saying. How thick are you?
What everyone is trying to tell you is that performance per watt simply means that the chip will have modern CPU performance at drastically reduced power levels, not that it is going to be 2x more powerful than modern CPUs. Reading Comprehension?
Since you like to bump your thread 5 times in two minutes, here's a couple bumps for you.
Avalon
Diamond Member
- Jul 16, 2001
- 7,571
- 178
- 106
PERFORMANCE PER WATT != PERFORMANCE
How can you take this, Soviet's post directly above, and say what you're saying at the top of my post? He just said it was 5x better performance per watt, and then you go and tell him that he's WRONG, and that it is 5x performance per watt. That's what he's been saying. How thick are you?
What everyone is trying to tell you is that performance per watt simply means that the chip will have modern CPU performance at drastically reduced power levels, not that it is going to be 2x more powerful than modern CPUs. Reading Comprehension?
Since you like to bump your thread 5 times in two minutes, here's a couple bumps for you.
Avalon
Diamond Member
- Jul 16, 2001
- 7,571
- 178
- 106
PERFORMANCE PER WATT != PERFORMANCE
How can you take this, Soviet's post directly above, and say what you're saying at the top of my post? He just said it was 5x better performance per watt, and then you go and tell him that he's WRONG, and that it is 5x performance per watt. That's what he's been saying. How thick are you?
What everyone is trying to tell you is that performance per watt simply means that the chip will have modern CPU performance at drastically reduced power levels, not that it is going to be 2x more powerful than modern CPUs. Reading Comprehension?
Since you like to bump your thread 5 times in two minutes, here's a couple bumps for you.
akugami
Diamond Member
- Feb 14, 2005
- 6,210
- 2,552
- 136
CLIFF NOTES:
Intelia: My good friend Palpatine, I mean Paul, said Cornrow will roxor joo AMD. It will be 5x more powerful than ___(insert two year old AMD CPU here). If you strike Cornrow down it will rise up again and become more powerful than you can ever imagine (think strapped to a chair watching Hayden Christensen "act" for 72 hours).
Everyone: Ok, Intel's numbers are marketecture. Basically they're numbers and speculations to show how good their products will be. Everyone does this, AMD does it, Apple does it, MS does it, Intel does it. It's the same with the 10ghz claim by Intel years back. And 5x more powerful per watt can mean that Conroe will be only slightly more powerful than todays top of the line CPU's but at drastically reduced power consumption levels.
Intelia: *Eric Cartmenn whining* Dangit, Paul said that Cornrow will be 5x more powerful. When it comes out over a year from now it will totally roxor AMD's CPU's out today which will be nearly two years on the market by then. That totally means Intel roxor joo.
Seriously, speculation is fine but stop spouting market speak as fact when it isn't. Stop stating (or at the very least implying) certain performance levels on a CPU as fact when it isn't even out and (to the best of my knowledge) not even taped out. I'm sure that Intel's new CPU's will be heads and tails better than the stupid P4 Netburst CPU's which sucked horribly when compared to AMD's A64 offerings. No one is saying it won't be better than what Intel has now. However, until engineering samples show up to the majority of reviewers and the chip hits the retail shelves, STFU about what it can and can't do because quite frankly, no one really knows at this point.
Intelia: My good friend Palpatine, I mean Paul, said Cornrow will roxor joo AMD. It will be 5x more powerful than ___(insert two year old AMD CPU here). If you strike Cornrow down it will rise up again and become more powerful than you can ever imagine (think strapped to a chair watching Hayden Christensen "act" for 72 hours).
Everyone: Ok, Intel's numbers are marketecture. Basically they're numbers and speculations to show how good their products will be. Everyone does this, AMD does it, Apple does it, MS does it, Intel does it. It's the same with the 10ghz claim by Intel years back. And 5x more powerful per watt can mean that Conroe will be only slightly more powerful than todays top of the line CPU's but at drastically reduced power consumption levels.
Intelia: *Eric Cartmenn whining* Dangit, Paul said that Cornrow will be 5x more powerful. When it comes out over a year from now it will totally roxor AMD's CPU's out today which will be nearly two years on the market by then. That totally means Intel roxor joo.
Seriously, speculation is fine but stop spouting market speak as fact when it isn't. Stop stating (or at the very least implying) certain performance levels on a CPU as fact when it isn't even out and (to the best of my knowledge) not even taped out. I'm sure that Intel's new CPU's will be heads and tails better than the stupid P4 Netburst CPU's which sucked horribly when compared to AMD's A64 offerings. No one is saying it won't be better than what Intel has now. However, until engineering samples show up to the majority of reviewers and the chip hits the retail shelves, STFU about what it can and can't do because quite frankly, no one really knows at this point.
LOL I won't be the one in the end caring the big stick . 2006 2H will bring a multidude of people here saying ya right see what you AMD DODO birds knew .Nothing it will be Zinn2b and hundreds more slashing and banting about AMD'S poor performance. I am doing the job I was ass. And I have done it well . I really did misup on H/T though darn. Oh well . So it well be us laughing in the end and it will be a relentless attack.
We have made every attempt to bring you the information needed to make conscientious open clean remarks and discusions about whats coming down the pipeline. But your closed mindness and constant attacks on every intel subject at these forums no matter who the poster is has shown you for what you are.
I do feel sorry for you and I won't go away until my job is done .Which is when Zinn2b's job starts and all the people who have been helping us.
Its going to be ugly but not as ugly as the people who constantly jump into an intel discussion and ruin it.
There are some really good people here . Very smart people indeed but there are way to many of the people who jump into a thread just to trash the conversations . I don't need to name names you know who you are and what you are.
That said thats enough from me on this thread. Until tomorrow when we here about Titanic being folded up and repackaged.
We have made every attempt to bring you the information needed to make conscientious open clean remarks and discusions about whats coming down the pipeline. But your closed mindness and constant attacks on every intel subject at these forums no matter who the poster is has shown you for what you are.
I do feel sorry for you and I won't go away until my job is done .Which is when Zinn2b's job starts and all the people who have been helping us.
Its going to be ugly but not as ugly as the people who constantly jump into an intel discussion and ruin it.
There are some really good people here . Very smart people indeed but there are way to many of the people who jump into a thread just to trash the conversations . I don't need to name names you know who you are and what you are.
That said thats enough from me on this thread. Until tomorrow when we here about Titanic being folded up and repackaged.
If this is the truth, then why not just end this thread here and revive it in a year, so that you can laugh at us?
Well, it could be a marketing machine like Sony. Intel is big enough for that. Still though, I can't wait to see how their new processor works out.
Markfw
Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
- May 16, 2002
- 27,259
- 16,117
- 136
OK, this is trolling..... motion to ban. I am so sick of this crap If in a year, Intel has good stuff, fine, but this is crap, and we are all sick of it. And the "all of the people who have been helping us " ? sounds like you and ziin2b who was banned are working to create the greatest trolling threads ever created by asking others to troll with you.
This is a self admission that I am going to bring to a mods attention.
BOy I thought I took technology and the forums a bit too serious...This sounds like some radical group (of idiots I may mention) with some militant agenda...the words used are quite astonishing....
Intelia in my mind there has always been a larger group behind you and your motivation on this forum. I wont name the company but I believe these are employees of said company.
I think your hours on this forum will be numbered...I know you will repackage your self and try to come in again and we will keep taking you out...YOur are like an annoying little infection that wont go away...
if the mods dont immediately ban then they are a bunch of idiots that need to be removed themselves....I commend them for taking out Dothan awhile ago...probably one of Unintelia's band of morons from said unsaid company....
i wonder what Intelia will say in 2H 06 when Cell hits the PC market and OWNS EVERYTHING (Inserts laugh here)
It amazes me that she thinks she is coming to the table with all the facts. Its no ones suprise that right now amd has the price/performance margin right now and have held the lead for quite some time. Apparently its more important to spend 700 bucks on a CPU that is marginally faster, right intelia? No thank you give me my 200 dollar CPU and i will go on my way, and if you think becuase you have gods gift to the CPU industry that its going to give you some type of edge in say, umm BF2 or Call of duty let me know, im quite sure ill put you in your place, BOOM HEADSHOT! (insert pure pwnage vid here)
It amazes me that she thinks she is coming to the table with all the facts. Its no ones suprise that right now amd has the price/performance margin right now and have held the lead for quite some time. Apparently its more important to spend 700 bucks on a CPU that is marginally faster, right intelia? No thank you give me my 200 dollar CPU and i will go on my way, and if you think becuase you have gods gift to the CPU industry that its going to give you some type of edge in say, umm BF2 or Call of duty let me know, im quite sure ill put you in your place, BOOM HEADSHOT! (insert pure pwnage vid here)
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 22K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
News NVIDIA and Intel to Develop AI Infrastructure and Personal Computing Products- Started by poke01
- Replies: 400
Facebook
Twitter