Intel 45nm OC Result Thread (Wolfdale E8400/E8500/E3110)

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

NdTRan

Member
Sep 20, 2005
65
0
0

CPU Name: E8400
FPO/BATCH #: Q746A514
S-Spec: SLAPL
Pack Date: 1/11/08
Place and Date of Purchase: microcenter
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Motherboard: evga 680i AR bios 32
CPU Volt: 1.3
FSBxMultiplier=Frequency: 444x9=4.0Ghz

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Memory: crucial ballistix pc8500
Speed: 547
Volt: 2.2
Timing(x/x/x/x): 5:5:5:15
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
HSF: Tuniq
Thermal Compound: AS-5

My temps are weird with this board as core 0 is 45 and core 1 is 36 idle. Under load with coretemp 0.96.1 it shows both core around 47-49 nothing higher. I did try to bench it at 4.5ghz successfully at 1.48 volts in bios and ran lower 10s in superpi test. I only orthos it for 10 min bc I did not want to put that much volts through it and not knowing if the temps reading are correct. I will wait to push it beyond 4.5ghz though, anyone else has luck with 4.5ghz.
 

Tempered81

Diamond Member
Jan 29, 2007
6,374
1
81
Originally posted by: NdTRan

CPU Name: E8400
FPO/BATCH #: Q746A514
S-Spec: SLAPL
Pack Date: 1/11/08
Place and Date of Purchase: microcenter
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Motherboard: evga 680i AR bios 32
CPU Volt: 1.3
FSBxMultiplier=Frequency: 444x9=4.0Ghz

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Memory: crucial ballistix pc8500
Speed: 547
Volt: 2.2
Timing(x/x/x/x): 5:5:5:15
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
HSF: Tuniq
Thermal Compound: AS-5

My temps are weird with this board as core 0 is 45 and core 1 is 36 idle. Under load with coretemp 0.96.1 it shows both core around 47-49 nothing higher. I did try to bench it at 4.5ghz successfully at 1.48 volts in bios and ran lower 10s in superpi test. I only orthos it for 10 min bc I did not want to put that much volts through it and not knowing if the temps reading are correct. I will wait to push it beyond 4.5ghz though, anyone else has luck with 4.5ghz.

i orthosed for over 1 hour at 4.5 with pc2-6400 ram with loose timings.

did you run dual prime/orthos, and what was your load temps after 10mins'?
 

NdTRan

Member
Sep 20, 2005
65
0
0
after about 10 min I was in the low 50s on both core but nothing over 55 degrees. WHat voltage were you using at 4.5ghz for yours set up. Thanks
 

Tempered81

Diamond Member
Jan 29, 2007
6,374
1
81
i believe i set 1.52 in bios and came to 1.44/1.42 cpuz / load. What vcore are you running, and 55 is hella cold for 4500mhz, i was touching 80C at load.
 

Magusigne

Golden Member
Nov 21, 2007
1,550
0
76
My First Overclock Guys.

1.18v

42C othos.

Set mine to 400FSB using all stock timings and voltages at auto.

E8400@3.6

Should I look into anything else. or do you guys think I'm safe with mostly stock settings at auto and altering my FSB
 

NdTRan

Member
Sep 20, 2005
65
0
0
For 4.5ghz I was running at 1.4825volts, I did a vdroop mod on my mobo so barely have any vdrop if any on my evga 680. Yeah I figure 55 degrees is way too cool for 1.5v but its like less then 20 degrees here in NY last couple of days so could be why. Are you using vista or window xp, I am using vista. Are you measuring temps with coretemp, in my bios it only says 30-37 degrees.
 

Tempered81

Diamond Member
Jan 29, 2007
6,374
1
81
a good idea is coretemp 96.1, everest, and if you have asusprobe or motherboard temp software... is to get readouts from all your software for your load temps... I've found reading everest and CT on my load temps was pretty much correct, however the Idle temps are always out of wack. One issue i had was my vid was sometimes reported differently during different boots in coretemp.
 

NdTRan

Member
Sep 20, 2005
65
0
0
Is there a certain everest version you are using? ALso how is you idle temps, mine always starts at 45 and 36 on every boot no mattery the clock speed so far. Havent gotten any VID problems with mine.
 

aussiestilgar

Senior member
Dec 2, 2007
245
0
0
My BIOS reads temps as low as 30c on boot, but once in windows Coretemp reads 40c+ idle, overclocked or not (even with speedstep enabled).
 

Tempered81

Diamond Member
Jan 29, 2007
6,374
1
81
Im using the latest everest want to say it was 4.20.1257 or something along those lines. Yeah my idle temps were poor with a huge delta between cores, something very similar to yours, but i don't believe those are correct temps anyway, so no reason worrying over them. Just keep an eye on load temps. (i think load temps are read pretty close to actual for e8400s in coretemp and everest)

don't know the reason for the VID issue. buggy coretemp incompatible with wolfdales i guess.

 

NaOH

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2006
5,015
0
0
Originally posted by: alfa147x
what is the cheapest recommended heat sink to go to 4ghz ? 40$, i cant justify .... $25-30 i can

There was a deal for the Zerotherm Nv120 for 33 after rebate. I'm at 4.05 and it runs at 38 load.
 

NdTRan

Member
Sep 20, 2005
65
0
0
So i just orthos it at 1.30625 volts for an hr again using coretemp 0..96.1 and everest they both still reading the same temps, still nothing over 50 at 1.3 volts. I hope these temps reading are correct. Anyone else putting anything more then 1.48 volts thru their cpu? How high are you guys getting.
 

coinz

Senior member
Oct 1, 2004
482
0
0
CPU Name: E8400
FPO/BATCH #: Q745A576
S-Spec:
Pack Date:1/04/08
Place and Date of Purchase:2/07/08
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Motherboard:GA-P35-DS3R (rev. 2.0)
CPU Volt:1.3
FSBxMultiplier=Frequency:450*9 = 4.05 ghz
MCP Volt:+0.1v
NB Volt:+0.2v
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Memory: Patriot Low Latency PC6400 2X1GB
Speed:450
Volt:2.1
Timing(x/x/x/x): 5-5-5-12
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
HSF: OCZ Vendetta
Lapped:No
Thermal Compound:Arctic Silver 5


I had first tested it with just the CPU test in orthos and ran around 15 hrs at 1.26v so I then switched over to blend thinking I had the CPU volts correct. Orthos would then fail after about 20 mins just close on me...so I thought the ram wasn't taking the overclock..tried everything upin the ram volts, the NB volts and MCP volts wouldn't do anything..but everything ran fine on the comp..crysis, cod4 did some video encoding with no lockups, couldn't figure out what was wrong.

I then decided to up the voltage on the cpu to 1.3 which is like 1.35 in this bios..runs perfectly 24 hrs orthos stable. Anyone know why it would need that? it idles around 33-34 and at load its around 60-63 degrees..perfectly fine with those temps.. pretty sure this can oc way higher but i'm good with this for now.

EDIT: I set the bus to 450x9 now so the ram would run at 900 orthos stable for 12 hours so far and counting
 

Anubis

No Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
78,716
417
126
tbqhwy.com
Originally posted by: coinz
CPU Name: E8400
FPO/BATCH #: Q745A576
S-Spec:
Pack Date:1/04/08
Place and Date of Purchase:2/07/08
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Motherboard:GA-P35-DS3R (rev. 2.0)
CPU Volt:1.3
FSBxMultiplier=Frequency:445*9 = 4.0 ghz
MCP Volt:+0.1v
NB Volt:+0.2v
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Memory: Patriot Low Latency PC6400 2X1GB
Speed:445
Volt:2.1
Timing(x/x/x/x): 5-5-5-12
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
HSF: OCZ Vendetta
Lapped:No
Thermal Compound:Arctic Silver 5


I had first tested it with just the CPU test in orthos and ran around 15 hrs at 1.26v so I then switched over to blend thinking I had the CPU volts correct. Orthos would then fail after about 20 mins just close on me...so I thought the ram wasn't taking the overclock..tried everything upin the ram volts, the NB volts and MCP volts wouldn't do anything..but everything ran fine on the comp..crysis, cod4 did some video encoding with no lockups, couldn't figure out what was wrong.

I then decided to up the voltage on the cpu to 1.3 which is like 1.35 in this bios..runs perfectly 24 hrs orthos stable. Anyone know why it would need that? it idles around 33-34 and at load its around 60-63 degrees..perfectly fine with those temps.. pretty sure this can oc way higher but i'm good with this for now.

IDk but same thing happened to me all works fine, similar temps to you
 

JAG87

Diamond Member
Jan 3, 2006
3,921
3
76
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: coinz
CPU Name: E8400
FPO/BATCH #: Q745A576
S-Spec:
Pack Date:1/04/08
Place and Date of Purchase:2/07/08
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Motherboard:GA-P35-DS3R (rev. 2.0)
CPU Volt:1.3
FSBxMultiplier=Frequency:445*9 = 4.0 ghz
MCP Volt:+0.1v
NB Volt:+0.2v
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Memory: Patriot Low Latency PC6400 2X1GB
Speed:445
Volt:2.1
Timing(x/x/x/x): 5-5-5-12
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
HSF: OCZ Vendetta
Lapped:No
Thermal Compound:Arctic Silver 5


I had first tested it with just the CPU test in orthos and ran around 15 hrs at 1.26v so I then switched over to blend thinking I had the CPU volts correct. Orthos would then fail after about 20 mins just close on me...so I thought the ram wasn't taking the overclock..tried everything upin the ram volts, the NB volts and MCP volts wouldn't do anything..but everything ran fine on the comp..crysis, cod4 did some video encoding with no lockups, couldn't figure out what was wrong.

I then decided to up the voltage on the cpu to 1.3 which is like 1.35 in this bios..runs perfectly 24 hrs orthos stable. Anyone know why it would need that? it idles around 33-34 and at load its around 60-63 degrees..perfectly fine with those temps.. pretty sure this can oc way higher but i'm good with this for now.

IDk but same thing happened to me all works fine, similar temps to you



because the CPU test in orthos runs the equivalent of small FFT in prime95, which contrary to popular belief, although produces the most heat, is not the most stressful test.

large FFTs are more stressful. the reason that small FFTs produce more heat is because everything is stored in the cache, the parameters are passes within the registers, and cache is 60% of the surface area of the cpu! the actual calculations are not as stressful as large FFT, thats why an overclock that is 15 hours stable with small FFT might fail after a few minutes in large FFT.

small FFT is only good to find the peak temperature the cpu will reach, and it is very good to find out if the cpu will crap out because of temperature, but it is not a good indicator of general stability. but neither is large FFT, because large FFT will not heat up the cpu enough to cause thermal failure. thats why blend is an ideal test.

hope this makes you understand :)
 

coinz

Senior member
Oct 1, 2004
482
0
0
Originally posted by: JAG87
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: coinz
CPU Name: E8400
FPO/BATCH #: Q745A576
S-Spec:
Pack Date:1/04/08
Place and Date of Purchase:2/07/08
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Motherboard:GA-P35-DS3R (rev. 2.0)
CPU Volt:1.3
FSBxMultiplier=Frequency:445*9 = 4.0 ghz
MCP Volt:+0.1v
NB Volt:+0.2v
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Memory: Patriot Low Latency PC6400 2X1GB
Speed:445
Volt:2.1
Timing(x/x/x/x): 5-5-5-12
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
HSF: OCZ Vendetta
Lapped:No
Thermal Compound:Arctic Silver 5


I had first tested it with just the CPU test in orthos and ran around 15 hrs at 1.26v so I then switched over to blend thinking I had the CPU volts correct. Orthos would then fail after about 20 mins just close on me...so I thought the ram wasn't taking the overclock..tried everything upin the ram volts, the NB volts and MCP volts wouldn't do anything..but everything ran fine on the comp..crysis, cod4 did some video encoding with no lockups, couldn't figure out what was wrong.

I then decided to up the voltage on the cpu to 1.3 which is like 1.35 in this bios..runs perfectly 24 hrs orthos stable. Anyone know why it would need that? it idles around 33-34 and at load its around 60-63 degrees..perfectly fine with those temps.. pretty sure this can oc way higher but i'm good with this for now.

IDk but same thing happened to me all works fine, similar temps to you



because the CPU test in orthos runs the equivalent of small FFT in prime95, which contrary to popular belief, although produces the most heat, is not the most stressful test.

large FFTs are more stressful. the reason that small FFTs produce more heat is because everything is stored in the cache, the parameters are passes within the registers, and cache is 60% of the surface area of the cpu! the actual calculations are not as stressful as large FFT, thats why an overclock that is 15 hours stable with small FFT might fail after a few minutes in large FFT.

small FFT is only good to find the peak temperature the cpu will reach, and it is very good to find out if the cpu will crap out because of temperature, but it is not a good indicator of general stability. but neither is large FFT, because large FFT will not heat up the cpu enough to cause thermal failure. thats why blend is an ideal test.

hope this makes you understand :)

ahh thanks man ya from your explanation I get why it crapped out on me..now at least I know why
 

Tempered81

Diamond Member
Jan 29, 2007
6,374
1
81
yeah 1.26 vcore is a tad to low in some cases for a stable 4.0ghz. You still have plenty of headroom until 1.40 vcore (which is what many are calling the barrier for the safe-zone)
 

Zapper48

Member
Oct 7, 2007
167
0
0
I downloaded the latest Speedfan Beta and it seems to be a few degrees lower compared
to Coretemp.So that's what I'm using.
 

Conroy9

Senior member
Jan 28, 2000
611
0
0
CPU Name: E8400
FPO/BATCH #: Q740A523
S-Spec: SLAPL
Pack Date: 12/27/07
Place and Date of Purchase: MicroCenter NY, 1/19/2008
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Motherboard: GA-P35-DS3P 2.0
Memory: Mushkin 996587 (2x2GB DDR2 800)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
HSF: Ultima 90 w/ SFlex-E controlled by motherboard
Lapped: by crazypc.com
Thermal Compound: TX-2


When I first got the chip, I immediately bumped FSB to 400, memory 1:1@5-4-4-12 and ran prime95 blend for a day to check stability.
Since then, I have been running undervolted 3ghz@1.0375 for a month and finally got around to seeing if I could get up to 4ghz.

First, I did a day of memtest86 at 400fsb, 6:5 DDR2 speed to make sure my ram could run >900 Mhz. I had to adjust memory timings from 5-4-4-12 to 5-5-5-18 to get the computer to boot.

Then I did a day of folding+prime95 blend at 6x cpu, 450 fsb, 1:1 DDR2 to make sure the FSB could run >445 Mhz - I needed to bump my DDR2 voltage .1v to get this to run without errors all day. (HWMonitor reports the result of this as 1.92v, which is weird because "normal" ddr2 voltage gets reported as 1.87)

Finally, I tried testing with 9x cpu, 445 fsb, 1:1 DDR2.
I set the CPU voltage to 3.5 because the Intel processorfinder page shows a range of up to 1.3675 and I'm afraid to get too close to that.
Prime95 was only able to run for 6.5 hours before it aborted with an error.
Temperatures at load went up to 40 mb, 48 CPU and 46/50 on my cores.

I guess I'm done with that experiment, unless someone has a theory about how to get my 4ghz oc stable without raising cpu volts anymore.

Regardless, I just wanted to see whether it was possible and I'm not a fan of any overvolting, so I'm probably just going to stick with 3ghz/1.0375v from now on, unless I have a good reason to bump it to 3.6/1.225v for some task, which I don't really foresee. Stock voltage for my processor is 1.225.
 

Zapper48

Member
Oct 7, 2007
167
0
0
CPU NAME E8400
FPO/BATCH# Q746A518
S-SPEC:SLAPL
PACK DATE: 1/15/08
PLACE AND DATE OF PURCHASE:Microcenter Denver 2/9/08
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
MOTHERBOARD: DFI 965 DARK-S
CPU VOLTS 1.31 (bios)
FSBxMultiplier 450x9 =4050mhz
NB VOLTS 1.55
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
MEMORY Crucial Ballistix DDR2 800
2x1gb and 2x512mb
VOLTS 2.2 (stock)
TIMING 5-5-5-15
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
HSF: Coolit Systems Eliminator

Orthos ran for 19 hours so far temps seem to be 65ish (Iknow many E8400s have a problem with the temp sensors)

Can't complain as 4.0ghz will be my 24/7 OC!!
 

Xpoc

Member
Feb 17, 2008
114
0
0
CPU Name: E8400
FPO/BATCH #: Q740A525T VID: 1.225V
S-Spec: SLAPL
Pack Date: 12/20/07
Place and Date of Purchase: Mysterybyte Feb/05/08
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Motherboard: Gigabyte X38-DS4
CPU Volt: 1.34V
FSBxMultiplier=Frequency: 445MHz x 9 = 4005MHz
MCP Volt: auto
NB Volt: auto
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Memory: 2GB (2x1GB) Patriot Extreme PC6400
Memory Volt: 2.2V(stock)
Memory Timing(x/x/x/x): 5-5-5-12 @ 890Mhz
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
HSF: Zalman 9500LED
Lapped: No
Thermal Compound: AS5


Running Prime for last 3hrs, and Core temps are 44c and 41c using Real Temp
 

Diogenes2

Platinum Member
Jul 26, 2001
2,151
0
0
CPU Name: E8400
FPO/BATCH #: BX80570E8400
S-Spec: SLAPL
Pack Date: 02/15/08
Place and Date of Purchase: ncix 2/23/08
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Motherboard: MSI P35 Neo2-FR
CPU Volt: 1.3 ( In BIOS )
FSBxMultiplier=Frequency: 9 x 399 = 3590
MCP Volt: Default ( ? )
NB Volt: ( Default )
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Memory: 4gb ( 2 x 2 ) Gskill PC8000
Speed: 399
Volt: 2.1
Timing(x/x/x/x): 13 5 5 5
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
HSF: Tuniq Tower 120
Lapped: No
Thermal Compound: Seven Carat Diamond



Just installed XP with defaults ..

Adjusted CPU volts to 1.3 - FSB to 399 - and let'er rip..

Running Orthos now .... Listening to MP3' - installing all my crap - Vegas - Turbo Cad - --

Once I'm confident 3.6 is stable - I'll shoot for some more..
 

ericb

Senior member
Nov 11, 1999
898
0
0
CPU Name: E3110 (Retail)
FPO/BATCH #: Q750A158
S-Spec: SLAPM
Pack Date: 02/06/08
Place and Date of Purchase: priceguidenetwork 3-5-2008
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Motherboard: Abit P35-E BIOS 15
CPU Volt: 1.056V (CPU-Z 1.44.1)
FSBxMultiplier=Frequency: 400*9
MCP Volt: Default
NB Volt: Default
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Memory: G.Skill PC2-6400 F2-6400CL5-1GBNQ (1GBx2)
Speed: 401
Volt: 1.8 BIOS (1.78 abitEQ reading)
Timing(x/x/x/x): 5 5 5 12
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
HSF: ROSEWILL|RCX-Z775-LX R
Lapped: No
Thermal Compound: Used existing Heatsink application

Running XP Pro SP2, all updates, not much else. Stable under Orthos for a couple hours but no overnight testing done yet. Hits around 50C under full load, seems to average 26C idle. No reason to push it more at this point until I get a new video card (only have a 7800GT).