Hey guys.
I've read many posts about Intel 320 vs. 510 however did not find the definite answer as my needs are different than someone else's.
I am going to buy a Lenovo Thinkpad W520 (16Gb RAM) for HD Video Editing with Premiere while also using Virtualization VMs which stresses the system quite a bit, and many apps opened concurrently. So I would say I am a pretty heavy duty user.
So performance does matter to me a lot but so do reliability. I've had reliability issues in the past with OCZ Vertex which I will never go back to.
Now I have narrowed my choice between the Intel 320 300Gb tro the Intel 510, 250gb.
What's the real world difference for an intensive user between the 510 and the 320. I understand SATA 3 is gold but reliability as I've heard is somewhat lower (plus some possible issues with Thinkpads? though only rumors).
Being that the INTEL 320 is yesterday's technology, and the Intel 510 is today's technology (and also near future). I was wondering if it would still make more sense to go for the Intel 320, 300gb rather than the Intel 510, 250gb. Money is not an issue, so price difference doesn't matter for me on this one.
Reliability matters a lot but so does performance, I have had an OCZ Vertex 250gb before which had issues which screwed up dozens of my files and many other people on the web reported the same. So now no more adventures for me.
I've read many posts about Intel 320 vs. 510 however did not find the definite answer as my needs are different than someone else's.
I am going to buy a Lenovo Thinkpad W520 (16Gb RAM) for HD Video Editing with Premiere while also using Virtualization VMs which stresses the system quite a bit, and many apps opened concurrently. So I would say I am a pretty heavy duty user.
So performance does matter to me a lot but so do reliability. I've had reliability issues in the past with OCZ Vertex which I will never go back to.
Now I have narrowed my choice between the Intel 320 300Gb tro the Intel 510, 250gb.
What's the real world difference for an intensive user between the 510 and the 320. I understand SATA 3 is gold but reliability as I've heard is somewhat lower (plus some possible issues with Thinkpads? though only rumors).
Being that the INTEL 320 is yesterday's technology, and the Intel 510 is today's technology (and also near future). I was wondering if it would still make more sense to go for the Intel 320, 300gb rather than the Intel 510, 250gb. Money is not an issue, so price difference doesn't matter for me on this one.
Reliability matters a lot but so does performance, I have had an OCZ Vertex 250gb before which had issues which screwed up dozens of my files and many other people on the web reported the same. So now no more adventures for me.
